The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Analytical technique to recover the third dimension in planar imaging of inhaled aerosols: (1) impact on spatial quantification

Tossici-Bolt, L., Fleming, J.S., Conway, J.H. and Martonen, T.B. (2006) Analytical technique to recover the third dimension in planar imaging of inhaled aerosols: (1) impact on spatial quantification Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 19, (4), pp. 565-579. (doi:10.1089/jam.2006.19.565).

Record type: Article

Abstract

An analytical algorithm is described for converting planar scintigraphic images of aerosol distributions in the lungs to an equivalent three-dimensional (3D) representation. The recovery of volumetric information should benefit regional quantification. The technique has been validated using simulated planar images of eleven known aerosol distributions in ten realistic lungs. Global and regional 3D parameters, such as the total activity deposition (A), the penetration index (PI) and the relative penetration index (rPI), were quantified on the planar images and on their 3D representation. Random and systematic errors of the estimation were measured. Finally, the performance of planar imaging was compared with that of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). SPECT images were simulated for the same aerosol distributions in the same subjects and quantified for A, PI, and rPI. The systematic errors in A, PI and rPI obtained from planar imaging were 8.9%, 64.8%, and 54.1%, respectively, using the two-dimensional (2D) analysis; they improved significantly to 4.4%, 19.0%, and 25.5% with the 3D analysis (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for SPECT were 5.2%, 9.8%, and 15.7%, significantly better for PI and rPI (p < 0.01). The random errors of A were similar for all techniques being about 5%; those of PI and rPI measurements were significantly higher for planar imaging (?14%) than SPECT (?8%). In conclusion, 3D spatial parameters can be derived from planar imaging that are significantly more accurate in characterizing different aerosol depositions than their 2D counterpart. However, the errors remain significantly higher than with SPECT.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 1 December 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 44145
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/44145
PURE UUID: 0055ffdf-199b-43b5-9b1d-09a705acf764
ORCID for J.H. Conway: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6464-1526

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Feb 2007
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 15:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Tossici-Bolt
Author: J.S. Fleming
Author: J.H. Conway ORCID iD
Author: T.B. Martonen

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×