The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A methodology to select topology generators for ad hoc mesh network simulations

A methodology to select topology generators for ad hoc mesh network simulations
A methodology to select topology generators for ad hoc mesh network simulations
Many academic and industrial research working on Wireless Communications and Networking rely on simulations, at least in the first stages, to obtain preliminary results to be subsequently validated in real settings. Topology generators (TG) are commonly used to generate the initial placement of nodes in artificial Ad Hoc Mesh Network topologies, where those simulations take place. The significance of these experiments heavily depends on the representativeness of artificial topologies. Indeed, if they were not drawn fairly, obtained results would apply only to a subset of possible configurations, hence they would lack of the appropriate generality required to port them to the real world. Although using many TGs could mitigate this issue by generating topologies in several different ways, which would entail a significant additional effort. Hence, the problem arises of what TGs to choose, among a number of available generators, to maximise the representativeness of generated topologies and reduce the number of TGs to use.
In this paper, we address this problem by investigating the presence of bias in the initial placement of nodes in artificial Ad Hoc Mesh Network topologies produced by different TGs. Indeed, any bias introduced by some TGs would affect the representativeness of generated topologies. We propose a methodology to quantify this bias and select what TGs to employ to minimise it, given the number of TGs to use. Our methodology relies on the extraction of a number of features from generated topologies. We carry out experiments on three well-known TGs, namely BRITE, NPART and GT-ITM. We find that selecting NPART (if one TG needs to be chosen) or BRITE and NPART (if two TGs need to be chosen) allows to minimise the bias index. The impact of our research lies in the provisioning of an empirical methodology to select the TGs to use for Ad Hoc Mesh Network simulations, which is expected to be beneficial for researchers involved in experimental evaluations on this type of networks.
1796-2021
O'Sullivan, Michael
a100f402-63c5-4fe7-b817-fc1c9da31097
Aniello, Leonardo
9846e2e4-1303-4b8b-9092-5d8e9bb514c3
Sassone, Vladimiro
df7d3c83-2aa0-4571-be94-9473b07b03e7
O'Sullivan, Michael
a100f402-63c5-4fe7-b817-fc1c9da31097
Aniello, Leonardo
9846e2e4-1303-4b8b-9092-5d8e9bb514c3
Sassone, Vladimiro
df7d3c83-2aa0-4571-be94-9473b07b03e7

O'Sullivan, Michael, Aniello, Leonardo and Sassone, Vladimiro (2020) A methodology to select topology generators for ad hoc mesh network simulations. Journal of Communications, 15 (10). (doi:10.12720/jcm.15.10.741-746).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Many academic and industrial research working on Wireless Communications and Networking rely on simulations, at least in the first stages, to obtain preliminary results to be subsequently validated in real settings. Topology generators (TG) are commonly used to generate the initial placement of nodes in artificial Ad Hoc Mesh Network topologies, where those simulations take place. The significance of these experiments heavily depends on the representativeness of artificial topologies. Indeed, if they were not drawn fairly, obtained results would apply only to a subset of possible configurations, hence they would lack of the appropriate generality required to port them to the real world. Although using many TGs could mitigate this issue by generating topologies in several different ways, which would entail a significant additional effort. Hence, the problem arises of what TGs to choose, among a number of available generators, to maximise the representativeness of generated topologies and reduce the number of TGs to use.
In this paper, we address this problem by investigating the presence of bias in the initial placement of nodes in artificial Ad Hoc Mesh Network topologies produced by different TGs. Indeed, any bias introduced by some TGs would affect the representativeness of generated topologies. We propose a methodology to quantify this bias and select what TGs to employ to minimise it, given the number of TGs to use. Our methodology relies on the extraction of a number of features from generated topologies. We carry out experiments on three well-known TGs, namely BRITE, NPART and GT-ITM. We find that selecting NPART (if one TG needs to be chosen) or BRITE and NPART (if two TGs need to be chosen) allows to minimise the bias index. The impact of our research lies in the provisioning of an empirical methodology to select the TGs to use for Ad Hoc Mesh Network simulations, which is expected to be beneficial for researchers involved in experimental evaluations on this type of networks.

Text
A Methodology to Select Topology Generators for AdHoc Mesh Network (camera ready) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (361kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 October 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441475
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441475
ISSN: 1796-2021
PURE UUID: c52cfd57-49b8-41ec-8f38-537892b7e58a
ORCID for Michael O'Sullivan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-4287
ORCID for Leonardo Aniello: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2886-8445

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michael O'Sullivan ORCID iD
Author: Leonardo Aniello ORCID iD
Author: Vladimiro Sassone

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×