The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Selective fish passage: restoring habitat connectivity without facilitating the spread of a non-native species

Selective fish passage: restoring habitat connectivity without facilitating the spread of a non-native species
Selective fish passage: restoring habitat connectivity without facilitating the spread of a non-native species

River managers are challenged to address two key threats to freshwater biodiversity. The first is the effects of habitat fragmentation by instream structures, such as dams and weirs, that disrupt migrations and impact species distributions. The second is the impact of non-native species on native species and ecological processes. However, mitigating anthropogenic habitat fragmentation through the installation of passage facilities can facilitate the invasion and spread of non-native species. This study compared the potential of two existing low-cost fish passage technologies designed for sloping weirs, a cylindrical bristle cluster (CBC) array and horizontally oriented studded tiles, to facilitate upstream movement of native European fish while preventing dispersal of non-native American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus); thus providing a selective fish passage solution. Crayfish movement and passage was experimentally quantified at a Crump weir installed in a recirculating flume under two velocity regimes (low and high), without (control) and with the addition of either a CBC array or studded tiles. Results were compared to passage efficacy (PE) data for native fish species for both technologies (existing data). Most (84.4%) crayfish were active during the trials, exhibiting frequent up and downstream movements below the weir. During control conditions under the high velocity regime, high velocities (ca. 2.39 m s −1) prevented crayfish reaching the foot of the weir (PE: 0%). Under the low velocity regime, relatively low velocities (ca. 0.74 m s −1) at the weir crest prevented most crayfish from passing (PE: 10–16%). Crayfish movement speed and total distance moved were lower under the high than the low velocity regime. Neither fish pass technology improved crayfish maximum distance of ascent on the downstream weir face or PE under either velocity regime. Under comparable conditions to the high velocity regime tested here, previous studies have shown both technologies improve PE for native fish. Hence, both CBC arrays and studded tiles would likely function as suitable selective fish passes where the conservation objective is not to aid the spread of non-native crayfish. Additional passage inhibiting technologies will be required at sites where complete blockage of crayfish movement is required.

Cylindrical bristle clusters, Passage efficiency, Riverine barrier, Signal crayfish, Sloped weir, Studded tiles
0301-4797
1-12
Kerr, James
cfdf2892-19c2-4206-9416-848b2b0f672c
Vowles, Andrew
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Crabb, Madelaine
2be6fa6e-b31e-4dab-b902-573bc90f5d44
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
Kerr, James
cfdf2892-19c2-4206-9416-848b2b0f672c
Vowles, Andrew
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Crabb, Madelaine
2be6fa6e-b31e-4dab-b902-573bc90f5d44
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7

Kerr, James, Vowles, Andrew, Crabb, Madelaine and Kemp, Paul (2021) Selective fish passage: restoring habitat connectivity without facilitating the spread of a non-native species. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 1-12, [110908]. (doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110908).

Record type: Article

Abstract

River managers are challenged to address two key threats to freshwater biodiversity. The first is the effects of habitat fragmentation by instream structures, such as dams and weirs, that disrupt migrations and impact species distributions. The second is the impact of non-native species on native species and ecological processes. However, mitigating anthropogenic habitat fragmentation through the installation of passage facilities can facilitate the invasion and spread of non-native species. This study compared the potential of two existing low-cost fish passage technologies designed for sloping weirs, a cylindrical bristle cluster (CBC) array and horizontally oriented studded tiles, to facilitate upstream movement of native European fish while preventing dispersal of non-native American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus); thus providing a selective fish passage solution. Crayfish movement and passage was experimentally quantified at a Crump weir installed in a recirculating flume under two velocity regimes (low and high), without (control) and with the addition of either a CBC array or studded tiles. Results were compared to passage efficacy (PE) data for native fish species for both technologies (existing data). Most (84.4%) crayfish were active during the trials, exhibiting frequent up and downstream movements below the weir. During control conditions under the high velocity regime, high velocities (ca. 2.39 m s −1) prevented crayfish reaching the foot of the weir (PE: 0%). Under the low velocity regime, relatively low velocities (ca. 0.74 m s −1) at the weir crest prevented most crayfish from passing (PE: 10–16%). Crayfish movement speed and total distance moved were lower under the high than the low velocity regime. Neither fish pass technology improved crayfish maximum distance of ascent on the downstream weir face or PE under either velocity regime. Under comparable conditions to the high velocity regime tested here, previous studies have shown both technologies improve PE for native fish. Hence, both CBC arrays and studded tiles would likely function as suitable selective fish passes where the conservation objective is not to aid the spread of non-native crayfish. Additional passage inhibiting technologies will be required at sites where complete blockage of crayfish movement is required.

Text
Accepted manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (89MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 June 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 November 2020
Published date: 1 February 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: We thank Andy Killingbeck and Peri Karageorgopoulos from the Environment Agency, England and Wales. Andy for his help in trapping signal crayfish and Peri for supplying the CBC array. We also thank the two reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Particular thanks goes to reviewer 2 for detailed suggestions that have been used to improve the clarity of the text. This study was supported by the European Horizon 2020 AMBER (Adaptive Management of Barriers in European Rivers) Project (Grant number: 689682) and sanctioned by the University of Southampton Ethical Review Board. All data supporting this study are openly available from the University of Southampton repository at https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D1414. Funding Information: We thank Andy Killingbeck and Peri Karageorgopoulos from the Environment Agency, England and Wales. Andy for his help in trapping signal crayfish and Peri for supplying the CBC array. We also thank the two reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Particular thanks goes to reviewer 2 for detailed suggestions that have been used to improve the clarity of the text. This study was supported by the European Horizon 2020 AMBER (Adaptive Management of Barriers in European Rivers) Project (Grant number: 689682 ) and sanctioned by the University of Southampton Ethical Review Board. All data supporting this study are openly available from the University of Southampton repository at https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D1414 . Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords: Cylindrical bristle clusters, Passage efficiency, Riverine barrier, Signal crayfish, Sloped weir, Studded tiles

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441638
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441638
ISSN: 0301-4797
PURE UUID: ee854628-f04d-4658-b78d-c437bfd382f2
ORCID for James Kerr: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-7293
ORCID for Andrew Vowles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-5938
ORCID for Paul Kemp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0589

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Kerr ORCID iD
Author: Andrew Vowles ORCID iD
Author: Madelaine Crabb
Author: Paul Kemp ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×