The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

AGILE-ACCORD: a randomized, multicentre, seamless, adaptive phase I/II platform study to determine the optimal dose, safety and efficacy of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial

AGILE-ACCORD: a randomized, multicentre, seamless, adaptive phase I/II platform study to determine the optimal dose, safety and efficacy of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial
AGILE-ACCORD: a randomized, multicentre, seamless, adaptive phase I/II platform study to determine the optimal dose, safety and efficacy of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial

Objectives: phase I - To determine the optimal dose of each candidate (or combination of candidates) entered into the platform. Phase II - To determine the efficacy and safety of each candidate entered into the platform, compared to the current Standard of Care (SoC), and recommend whether it should be evaluated further in a later phase II & III platforms.

Trial design: AGILE-ACCORD is a Bayesian multicentre, multi-arm, multi-dose, multi-stage open-label, adaptive, seamless phase I/II randomised platform trial to determine the optimal dose, activity and safety of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19. Designed as a master protocol with each candidate being evaluated within its own sub-protocol (Candidate Specific Trial (CST) protocol), randomising between candidate and SoC with 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate (N.B the first candidate has gone through regulatory approval and is expected to open to recruitment early summer 2020). Each dose will be assessed for safety sequentially in cohorts of 6 patients. Once a phase II dose has been identified we will assess efficacy by seamlessly expanding into a larger cohort.

Participants: patient populations can vary between CSTs, but the main eligibility criteria include adult patients (≥18 years) who have laboratory-confirmed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We will include both severe and mild-moderate patients defined as follows: Group A (severe disease) - patients with WHO Working Group on the Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 infection 9-point ordinal scale of Grades 4 (hospitalised, oxygen by mask or nasal prongs), 5 (hospitalised, non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen), 6 (hospitalised, intubation and mechanical ventilation) or 7 (hospitalised, ventilation and additional organ support); Group B (mild-moderate disease) - ambulant or hospitalised patients with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) >94% RA. If any CSTs are included in the community setting, the CST protocol will clarify whether patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection are also eligible. Participants will be recruited from England, North Ireland, Wales and Scotland.

Intervention and comparator: comparator is the current standard of care (SoC), in some CSTs plus placebo. Candidates that prevent uncontrolled cytokine release, prevention of viral replication, and other anti-viral treatment strategies are at various stages of development for inclusion into AGILE-ACCORD. Other CSTs will be added over time. There is not a set limit on the number of CSTs we can include within the AGILE-ACCORD Master protocol and we will upload each CST into this publication as each opens to recruitment.

Main outcomes: phase I: Dose limiting toxicities using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 Grade ≥3 adverse events. Phase II: Agreed on a CST basis depending on mechanism of action of the candidate and patient population. But may include; time to clinical improvement of at least 2 points on the WHO 9-point category ordinal scale [measured up to 29 days from randomisation], progression of disease (oxygen saturation (SaO2) <92%) or hospitalization or death, or change in time-weighted viral load [measured up to 29 days from randomisation].

Randomisation: varies with CST, but default is 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate to maximise early safety data.

Blinding (masking): for the safety phase open-label although for some CSTs may include placebo or SoC for the efficacy phase.

Numbers to be randomised (sample size): varies between CSTs. However simulations have shown that around 16 participants are necessary to determine futility or promise of a candidate at a given dose (in efficacy evaluation alone) and between 32 and 40 participants are required across the dose-finding and efficacy evaluation when capping the maximum number of participants contributing to the evaluation of a treatment at 40.

Trial status: master protocol version number v5 07 May 2020, trial is in setup with full regulatory approval and utilises several digital technology solutions, including Medidata's Rave EDC [electronic data capture], RTSM for randomisation and patient eConsent on iPads via Rave Patient Cloud. The recruitment dates will vary between CSTs but at the time of writing no CSTs are yet open for recruitment.

Trial registration: EudraCT 2020-001860-27 14th March 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Bayesian, COVID-19, Master protocol, Phase I/II, Platform study, Randomised controlled trial
1745-6215
1-3
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Fitzgerald, Richard
ee3308c2-16b8-4295-9130-1f52e5f20f59
Jaki, Thomas
efdca16f-300c-4d9c-9b05-54212d077635
Corkhill, Andrea
e74ed394-38fb-4bfb-883d-681b2aeaf931
Marwood, Ellice
69d285de-08c6-4af3-96a5-b6183039eeae
Reynolds, Helen
b39593c5-bf19-4cf9-aac4-b439c2ea7543
Stanton, Louise
8b827763-d839-4b4b-bbf2-358a84110294
Ewings, Sean
326656df-c0f0-44a1-b64f-8fe9578ca18a
Condie, Susannah
b3c7e59a-72af-45f4-8f0b-6a9ecd2b0d0c
Wrixon, Emma
bc05ea9a-42c2-48ab-a1a9-3086367fb452
Norton, Andrea
6a819472-ac94-4bae-bc7d-9c89d8247491
Radford, Mike
844eb99f-848e-4297-8c9a-6eaf992f3abf
Yeats, Sara
a8e25567-4268-4746-b526-e64e3a1c2cfd
Robertson, Jane
a984af39-fefa-4397-a27b-0d4a8767fd91
Darby-Dowman, Rachel
4c2210bf-0a5c-422c-baf7-193353c5a257
Walker, Lauren
b68adbc8-08f1-447b-a26b-6be2f601cf0f
Khoo, Saye
4ad67fee-e6a4-43d2-b7a8-5920d718f568
UK NIHR community
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Fitzgerald, Richard
ee3308c2-16b8-4295-9130-1f52e5f20f59
Jaki, Thomas
efdca16f-300c-4d9c-9b05-54212d077635
Corkhill, Andrea
e74ed394-38fb-4bfb-883d-681b2aeaf931
Marwood, Ellice
69d285de-08c6-4af3-96a5-b6183039eeae
Reynolds, Helen
b39593c5-bf19-4cf9-aac4-b439c2ea7543
Stanton, Louise
8b827763-d839-4b4b-bbf2-358a84110294
Ewings, Sean
326656df-c0f0-44a1-b64f-8fe9578ca18a
Condie, Susannah
b3c7e59a-72af-45f4-8f0b-6a9ecd2b0d0c
Wrixon, Emma
bc05ea9a-42c2-48ab-a1a9-3086367fb452
Norton, Andrea
6a819472-ac94-4bae-bc7d-9c89d8247491
Radford, Mike
844eb99f-848e-4297-8c9a-6eaf992f3abf
Yeats, Sara
a8e25567-4268-4746-b526-e64e3a1c2cfd
Robertson, Jane
a984af39-fefa-4397-a27b-0d4a8767fd91
Darby-Dowman, Rachel
4c2210bf-0a5c-422c-baf7-193353c5a257
Walker, Lauren
b68adbc8-08f1-447b-a26b-6be2f601cf0f
Khoo, Saye
4ad67fee-e6a4-43d2-b7a8-5920d718f568

Griffiths, Gareth, Fitzgerald, Richard, Jaki, Thomas, Corkhill, Andrea, Marwood, Ellice, Reynolds, Helen, Stanton, Louise, Ewings, Sean, Condie, Susannah, Wrixon, Emma, Norton, Andrea, Radford, Mike, Yeats, Sara, Robertson, Jane, Darby-Dowman, Rachel, Walker, Lauren and Khoo, Saye , UK NIHR community (2020) AGILE-ACCORD: a randomized, multicentre, seamless, adaptive phase I/II platform study to determine the optimal dose, safety and efficacy of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial. Trials, 21 (1), 1-3, [544]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04473-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: phase I - To determine the optimal dose of each candidate (or combination of candidates) entered into the platform. Phase II - To determine the efficacy and safety of each candidate entered into the platform, compared to the current Standard of Care (SoC), and recommend whether it should be evaluated further in a later phase II & III platforms.

Trial design: AGILE-ACCORD is a Bayesian multicentre, multi-arm, multi-dose, multi-stage open-label, adaptive, seamless phase I/II randomised platform trial to determine the optimal dose, activity and safety of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19. Designed as a master protocol with each candidate being evaluated within its own sub-protocol (Candidate Specific Trial (CST) protocol), randomising between candidate and SoC with 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate (N.B the first candidate has gone through regulatory approval and is expected to open to recruitment early summer 2020). Each dose will be assessed for safety sequentially in cohorts of 6 patients. Once a phase II dose has been identified we will assess efficacy by seamlessly expanding into a larger cohort.

Participants: patient populations can vary between CSTs, but the main eligibility criteria include adult patients (≥18 years) who have laboratory-confirmed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We will include both severe and mild-moderate patients defined as follows: Group A (severe disease) - patients with WHO Working Group on the Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 infection 9-point ordinal scale of Grades 4 (hospitalised, oxygen by mask or nasal prongs), 5 (hospitalised, non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen), 6 (hospitalised, intubation and mechanical ventilation) or 7 (hospitalised, ventilation and additional organ support); Group B (mild-moderate disease) - ambulant or hospitalised patients with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) >94% RA. If any CSTs are included in the community setting, the CST protocol will clarify whether patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection are also eligible. Participants will be recruited from England, North Ireland, Wales and Scotland.

Intervention and comparator: comparator is the current standard of care (SoC), in some CSTs plus placebo. Candidates that prevent uncontrolled cytokine release, prevention of viral replication, and other anti-viral treatment strategies are at various stages of development for inclusion into AGILE-ACCORD. Other CSTs will be added over time. There is not a set limit on the number of CSTs we can include within the AGILE-ACCORD Master protocol and we will upload each CST into this publication as each opens to recruitment.

Main outcomes: phase I: Dose limiting toxicities using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 Grade ≥3 adverse events. Phase II: Agreed on a CST basis depending on mechanism of action of the candidate and patient population. But may include; time to clinical improvement of at least 2 points on the WHO 9-point category ordinal scale [measured up to 29 days from randomisation], progression of disease (oxygen saturation (SaO2) <92%) or hospitalization or death, or change in time-weighted viral load [measured up to 29 days from randomisation].

Randomisation: varies with CST, but default is 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate to maximise early safety data.

Blinding (masking): for the safety phase open-label although for some CSTs may include placebo or SoC for the efficacy phase.

Numbers to be randomised (sample size): varies between CSTs. However simulations have shown that around 16 participants are necessary to determine futility or promise of a candidate at a given dose (in efficacy evaluation alone) and between 32 and 40 participants are required across the dose-finding and efficacy evaluation when capping the maximum number of participants contributing to the evaluation of a treatment at 40.

Trial status: master protocol version number v5 07 May 2020, trial is in setup with full regulatory approval and utilises several digital technology solutions, including Medidata's Rave EDC [electronic data capture], RTSM for randomisation and patient eConsent on iPads via Rave Patient Cloud. The recruitment dates will vary between CSTs but at the time of writing no CSTs are yet open for recruitment.

Trial registration: EudraCT 2020-001860-27 14th March 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Text
s13063-020-04473-1 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (425kB)
Text
2020 AGILE ACCORD A randomised multicentre seamless
Download (428kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 June 2020
Published date: 19 June 2020
Keywords: Bayesian, COVID-19, Master protocol, Phase I/II, Platform study, Randomised controlled trial

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441667
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441667
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 9481c115-269f-4427-b862-a95f6c58ce58
ORCID for Gareth Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021
ORCID for Louise Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-840X
ORCID for Sean Ewings: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7214-4917

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2020 16:54
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Fitzgerald
Author: Thomas Jaki
Author: Andrea Corkhill
Author: Ellice Marwood
Author: Helen Reynolds
Author: Louise Stanton ORCID iD
Author: Sean Ewings ORCID iD
Author: Susannah Condie
Author: Emma Wrixon
Author: Andrea Norton
Author: Mike Radford
Author: Sara Yeats
Author: Jane Robertson
Author: Rachel Darby-Dowman
Author: Lauren Walker
Author: Saye Khoo
Corporate Author: UK NIHR community

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×