The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: the ASCKS framework

UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: the ASCKS framework
UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: the ASCKS framework
Background: studies indicatethere is a need to improve the delivery of unexpected news via obstetric ultrasound, but there have been few advances in this area. One factor preventing improvement has been a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate phrases and behaviours which sonographers and ultrasound practitioners should use in these situations.

Aims: to develop consensus guidelines forunexpected news delivery inEarly Pregnancy Unit (EPU) and Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) NHS settings.

Methods: a workshop was conducted to identify priorities and reach consensus on areas of contention.Contributors included interdisciplinary healthcare professionals, policy experts, representatives from third-sector organisations, lay experts and academic researchers (n = 28). Written and verbal feedback was used to draft initial guidance which wasthen circulated amongstthe wider writing group (n = 39). Revisionswereundertaken untilconsensus was reached.

Results: consensus guidelines were developed outliningthe behaviours and phrases which should be used during scans where unexpected findings areidentified. Specific recommendations included that: honest andclear communication should be prioritised, evenwith uncertain findings; technical terms should be used, but these should be written down together with their lay interpretations; unless expectant parents use other terminology (e.g., ‘fetus’), the term ‘baby’ should be used as a default, even in early pregnancy; atthe initial news disclosure, communication should focus oninformationprovision. Expectant parents should not be asked to make decisions during the scan.

Conclusions: these recommendations can be used to develop and improve news delivery interventions inobstetric ultrasound settings.
Johnson, Judith
8fb195ae-89df-4bca-99b3-6d0a0e4268ef
Arezina, Jane
28426a7e-b209-41bf-8b10-5297888ae1cf
Alt, Siobhan
1e97ffdf-29dc-4bfb-b78d-bed52901cb2b
Arnold, Jon
c5c67261-37a0-4fef-8969-a74d096fb7ab
Bailey, Sarah
3c7e9f3c-8713-4e9e-90af-e8f9174c8e47
Beety, Hannah
55681e29-3feb-41b1-8fe5-3b3e7b14e8f0
Bender-Atik, Ruth
3b1270a6-7fb8-48ac-b182-60b9c0a6c80c
Bryant, Louise
c8dc42b1-821a-4615-961b-402b9ac8d7bc
Coates, Jen
e3575501-b28a-48a7-8ebb-bf654b7f649e
Collinge, Sam
7739802c-902f-4c83-97c2-60c0e1ece77d
Fishburn, Jo
0018cdfd-80d1-4199-9ed7-1fb69d1960c3
Fisher, Jane
fd1e1955-b474-49e2-ae7d-e5c53ef58c70
Fowler, Jan
c4c0ec75-2c8b-424a-aa25-a6d399a10099
Glanville, Tracey
ff5e3875-ad44-4ded-93c9-aba313eed164
Hallett, Julin
c81e45cb-41ac-4445-aebf-300805880d60
Harley-Roberts, Ailith
40ec12fc-1e97-49c8-8fdc-2037c9697674
Harrison, Gill
2f41ce98-bcef-4bf0-95d7-e42c2fc45282
Horwood, Karen
9c41347e-1734-47c0-9ffc-1b12e11dab2d
Hynes, Catriona
46d73764-a419-4469-ac6f-89955d8031f5
Kimm, Lindsay
cc5b4a2b-50e7-4749-b442-7140bcb9627e
Johnson, Judith
8fb195ae-89df-4bca-99b3-6d0a0e4268ef
Arezina, Jane
28426a7e-b209-41bf-8b10-5297888ae1cf
Alt, Siobhan
1e97ffdf-29dc-4bfb-b78d-bed52901cb2b
Arnold, Jon
c5c67261-37a0-4fef-8969-a74d096fb7ab
Bailey, Sarah
3c7e9f3c-8713-4e9e-90af-e8f9174c8e47
Beety, Hannah
55681e29-3feb-41b1-8fe5-3b3e7b14e8f0
Bender-Atik, Ruth
3b1270a6-7fb8-48ac-b182-60b9c0a6c80c
Bryant, Louise
c8dc42b1-821a-4615-961b-402b9ac8d7bc
Coates, Jen
e3575501-b28a-48a7-8ebb-bf654b7f649e
Collinge, Sam
7739802c-902f-4c83-97c2-60c0e1ece77d
Fishburn, Jo
0018cdfd-80d1-4199-9ed7-1fb69d1960c3
Fisher, Jane
fd1e1955-b474-49e2-ae7d-e5c53ef58c70
Fowler, Jan
c4c0ec75-2c8b-424a-aa25-a6d399a10099
Glanville, Tracey
ff5e3875-ad44-4ded-93c9-aba313eed164
Hallett, Julin
c81e45cb-41ac-4445-aebf-300805880d60
Harley-Roberts, Ailith
40ec12fc-1e97-49c8-8fdc-2037c9697674
Harrison, Gill
2f41ce98-bcef-4bf0-95d7-e42c2fc45282
Horwood, Karen
9c41347e-1734-47c0-9ffc-1b12e11dab2d
Hynes, Catriona
46d73764-a419-4469-ac6f-89955d8031f5
Kimm, Lindsay
cc5b4a2b-50e7-4749-b442-7140bcb9627e

Johnson, Judith, Arezina, Jane, Alt, Siobhan, Arnold, Jon, Bailey, Sarah, Beety, Hannah, Bender-Atik, Ruth, Bryant, Louise, Coates, Jen, Collinge, Sam, Fishburn, Jo, Fisher, Jane, Fowler, Jan, Glanville, Tracey, Hallett, Julin, Harley-Roberts, Ailith, Harrison, Gill, Horwood, Karen, Hynes, Catriona and Kimm, Lindsay (2020) UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: the ASCKS framework. Ultrasound. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: studies indicatethere is a need to improve the delivery of unexpected news via obstetric ultrasound, but there have been few advances in this area. One factor preventing improvement has been a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate phrases and behaviours which sonographers and ultrasound practitioners should use in these situations.

Aims: to develop consensus guidelines forunexpected news delivery inEarly Pregnancy Unit (EPU) and Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) NHS settings.

Methods: a workshop was conducted to identify priorities and reach consensus on areas of contention.Contributors included interdisciplinary healthcare professionals, policy experts, representatives from third-sector organisations, lay experts and academic researchers (n = 28). Written and verbal feedback was used to draft initial guidance which wasthen circulated amongstthe wider writing group (n = 39). Revisionswereundertaken untilconsensus was reached.

Results: consensus guidelines were developed outliningthe behaviours and phrases which should be used during scans where unexpected findings areidentified. Specific recommendations included that: honest andclear communication should be prioritised, evenwith uncertain findings; technical terms should be used, but these should be written down together with their lay interpretations; unless expectant parents use other terminology (e.g., ‘fetus’), the term ‘baby’ should be used as a default, even in early pregnancy; atthe initial news disclosure, communication should focus oninformationprovision. Expectant parents should not be asked to make decisions during the scan.

Conclusions: these recommendations can be used to develop and improve news delivery interventions inobstetric ultrasound settings.

Text
UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound The ASCKS framework - Accepted Manuscript
Download (619kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 May 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441850
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441850
PURE UUID: 6747f2dd-4973-435d-a59c-eec74df3c310

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 08:20

Export record

Contributors

Author: Judith Johnson
Author: Jane Arezina
Author: Siobhan Alt
Author: Jon Arnold
Author: Sarah Bailey
Author: Hannah Beety
Author: Ruth Bender-Atik
Author: Louise Bryant
Author: Jen Coates
Author: Sam Collinge
Author: Jo Fishburn
Author: Jane Fisher
Author: Jan Fowler
Author: Tracey Glanville
Author: Julin Hallett
Author: Ailith Harley-Roberts
Author: Gill Harrison
Author: Karen Horwood
Author: Catriona Hynes
Author: Lindsay Kimm

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×