The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How do women's diets compare with the new Australian dietary guidelines?

How do women's diets compare with the new Australian dietary guidelines?
How do women's diets compare with the new Australian dietary guidelines?

OBJECTIVE: To compare women's diets with recommended intakes from the new Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG 2013).

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Diet was assessed using a validated FFQ.

SETTING: Two nationally representative age cohorts of Australian women.

SUBJECTS: Women in the young cohort (born 1973-1978, aged 31-36 years) and mid-age cohort (born 1946-1951, aged 50-55 years). Women (n 18 226) were categorised into three groups: 'young women' (n 5760), young 'pregnant women' at the time or who had given birth in the 12 months prior to the survey (n 1999) and 'mid-age women' (n 10 467).

RESULTS: Less than 2 % of women in all three groups attained the ADG 2013 recommendation of five daily servings of vegetables, with the majority needing more than two additional servings. For young women, less than one-third met recommendations for fruit (32%) and meat and alternatives (28 %), while only a small minority did so for dairy (12 %) and cereals (7 %). Fifty per cent of pregnant women met guidelines for fruit, but low percentages reached guidelines for dairy (22 %), meat and alternatives (10 %) and cereals (2·5 %). For mid-age women, adherence was higher for meat and alternatives (41 %) and cereals (45 %), whereas only 1 % had the suggested dairy intake of four daily servings.

CONCLUSIONS: For most women to follow ADG 2013 recommendations would require substantially increased consumption of cereals, vegetables and dairy. Findings have implications for tailoring the dissemination of dietary guidelines for women in different age groups and for pregnant women.

Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Australia, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dairy Products, Diet/adverse effects, Edible Grain, Elder Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Female, Fruit, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Middle Aged, Nutrition Policy/trends, Nutrition Surveys, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Vegetables
1368-9800
218-225
Mishra, Gita D.
02143b82-e536-4915-9b30-3c86cbe1a1fe
Schoenaker, Danielle A.J.M.
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Mihrshahi, Seema
1389320a-e334-4f31-b63f-4a0733fd5c29
Dobson, Annette J.
e0837e7f-6bcd-4709-8706-899ae2cff1b2
Mishra, Gita D.
02143b82-e536-4915-9b30-3c86cbe1a1fe
Schoenaker, Danielle A.J.M.
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Mihrshahi, Seema
1389320a-e334-4f31-b63f-4a0733fd5c29
Dobson, Annette J.
e0837e7f-6bcd-4709-8706-899ae2cff1b2

Mishra, Gita D., Schoenaker, Danielle A.J.M., Mihrshahi, Seema and Dobson, Annette J. (2015) How do women's diets compare with the new Australian dietary guidelines? Public Health Nutrition, 18 (2), 218-225. (doi:10.1017/S1368980014000135).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare women's diets with recommended intakes from the new Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG 2013).

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Diet was assessed using a validated FFQ.

SETTING: Two nationally representative age cohorts of Australian women.

SUBJECTS: Women in the young cohort (born 1973-1978, aged 31-36 years) and mid-age cohort (born 1946-1951, aged 50-55 years). Women (n 18 226) were categorised into three groups: 'young women' (n 5760), young 'pregnant women' at the time or who had given birth in the 12 months prior to the survey (n 1999) and 'mid-age women' (n 10 467).

RESULTS: Less than 2 % of women in all three groups attained the ADG 2013 recommendation of five daily servings of vegetables, with the majority needing more than two additional servings. For young women, less than one-third met recommendations for fruit (32%) and meat and alternatives (28 %), while only a small minority did so for dairy (12 %) and cereals (7 %). Fifty per cent of pregnant women met guidelines for fruit, but low percentages reached guidelines for dairy (22 %), meat and alternatives (10 %) and cereals (2·5 %). For mid-age women, adherence was higher for meat and alternatives (41 %) and cereals (45 %), whereas only 1 % had the suggested dairy intake of four daily servings.

CONCLUSIONS: For most women to follow ADG 2013 recommendations would require substantially increased consumption of cereals, vegetables and dairy. Findings have implications for tailoring the dissemination of dietary guidelines for women in different age groups and for pregnant women.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2015
Keywords: Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Australia, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dairy Products, Diet/adverse effects, Edible Grain, Elder Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Female, Fruit, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Middle Aged, Nutrition Policy/trends, Nutrition Surveys, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Vegetables

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441987
ISSN: 1368-9800
PURE UUID: b9f4e342-552f-408e-b0f0-2e60267e04d4
ORCID for Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-990X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2020 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gita D. Mishra
Author: Seema Mihrshahi
Author: Annette J. Dobson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×