Evaluation of international contemporary operative outcomes and management trends associated with esophagectomy: a four-year study of over 6,000 patients using ECCG definitions and the online Esodata database
Evaluation of international contemporary operative outcomes and management trends associated with esophagectomy: a four-year study of over 6,000 patients using ECCG definitions and the online Esodata database
Objective:
This study aims to verify the utility of international online datasets to benchmark and monitor treatment and outcomes in major oncologic procedures.
Background:
The Esophageal Complication Consensus Group (ECCG) has standardized the reporting of complications after esophagectomy within the web-based Esodata.org database. This study will utilize the Esodata dataset to update contemporary outcomes and to monitor trends in practice in an era of rapid technical change.
Methods:
This observational study, based on a prospectively developed specific database, updates esophagectomy outcomes collected between 2015 and 2018. Evolution in patient and operative demographics, treatment, complications, and quality outcome measures were compared between patients undergoing surgery in 2015 to 2016 and 2017 to 2018.
Results:
Between 2015 and 2018, 6022 esophagectomies from 39 centers were entered into Esodata. Most patients were male (78.3%) with median age 63. Patients having minimally invasive esophagectomy constituted 3177 (52.8%), a chest anastomosis 3838 (63.7%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 2834 (48.7%), and R0 resections 5441 (93.5%). For quality measures, 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.0% and 4.5%, readmissions 9.7%, transfusions 12%, escalation in care 22.1%, and discharge home 89.4%. Trends in quality measures between 2015 and 2016 (2407 patients) and 2017 and 2018 (3318 patients) demonstrated significant (P < 0.05) improvements in readmissions 11.1% to 8.5%, blood transfusions 14.3% to 10.2%, and escalation in care from 24.5% to 20% A significantly (P < 0.05) reduced incidence in pneumonia (15.3%–12.8%) and renal failure (1.0%–0.4%) was observed. Anastomotic leak rates increased from 11.7% to 13.1%, whereas leaks requiring surgery decreased 3.3% and 3.0%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The Esodata database provides a valuable resource for assessing contemporary international outcomes. This study highlights an increased application of minimally invasive approaches, a high percentage of complications, improvements in pneumonia and key quality metrics, but with anastomotic leak rates still >10%.
Kuppusamy, Madhan K
4ac8054b-9a83-457e-b0d3-852a58f8bc09
Low, Donald E
11a9bba0-e071-4380-9120-fa29f40474dd
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
International Esodata Study group (IESG)
International Esodata Study group (IESG)
Kuppusamy, Madhan K
4ac8054b-9a83-457e-b0d3-852a58f8bc09
Low, Donald E
11a9bba0-e071-4380-9120-fa29f40474dd
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Kuppusamy, Madhan K, Low, Donald E and Underwood, Timothy
,
International Esodata Study group (IESG) and International Esodata Study group (IESG)
(2020)
Evaluation of international contemporary operative outcomes and management trends associated with esophagectomy: a four-year study of over 6,000 patients using ECCG definitions and the online Esodata database.
Annals of Surgery.
(doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004309).
Abstract
Objective:
This study aims to verify the utility of international online datasets to benchmark and monitor treatment and outcomes in major oncologic procedures.
Background:
The Esophageal Complication Consensus Group (ECCG) has standardized the reporting of complications after esophagectomy within the web-based Esodata.org database. This study will utilize the Esodata dataset to update contemporary outcomes and to monitor trends in practice in an era of rapid technical change.
Methods:
This observational study, based on a prospectively developed specific database, updates esophagectomy outcomes collected between 2015 and 2018. Evolution in patient and operative demographics, treatment, complications, and quality outcome measures were compared between patients undergoing surgery in 2015 to 2016 and 2017 to 2018.
Results:
Between 2015 and 2018, 6022 esophagectomies from 39 centers were entered into Esodata. Most patients were male (78.3%) with median age 63. Patients having minimally invasive esophagectomy constituted 3177 (52.8%), a chest anastomosis 3838 (63.7%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 2834 (48.7%), and R0 resections 5441 (93.5%). For quality measures, 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.0% and 4.5%, readmissions 9.7%, transfusions 12%, escalation in care 22.1%, and discharge home 89.4%. Trends in quality measures between 2015 and 2016 (2407 patients) and 2017 and 2018 (3318 patients) demonstrated significant (P < 0.05) improvements in readmissions 11.1% to 8.5%, blood transfusions 14.3% to 10.2%, and escalation in care from 24.5% to 20% A significantly (P < 0.05) reduced incidence in pneumonia (15.3%–12.8%) and renal failure (1.0%–0.4%) was observed. Anastomotic leak rates increased from 11.7% to 13.1%, whereas leaks requiring surgery decreased 3.3% and 3.0%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The Esodata database provides a valuable resource for assessing contemporary international outcomes. This study highlights an increased application of minimally invasive approaches, a high percentage of complications, improvements in pneumonia and key quality metrics, but with anastomotic leak rates still >10%.
Text
An Evaluation of Operative Outcomes
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 June 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 October 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 442034
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/442034
ISSN: 0003-4932
PURE UUID: 487a5f15-f654-46d7-a2bb-817835b1659f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jul 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Madhan K Kuppusamy
Author:
Donald E Low
Corporate Author: International Esodata Study group (IESG)
Corporate Author: International Esodata Study group (IESG)
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics