The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pharmacokinetics, clot strength and safety of a new fibrinogen concentrate: randomized comparison with active control in congenital fibrinogen deficiency

Pharmacokinetics, clot strength and safety of a new fibrinogen concentrate: randomized comparison with active control in congenital fibrinogen deficiency
Pharmacokinetics, clot strength and safety of a new fibrinogen concentrate: randomized comparison with active control in congenital fibrinogen deficiency

Essentials

Congenital afibrinogenemia causes a potentially life‐threatening bleeding and clotting tendency.
Two human fibrinogen concentrates (HFCs) were compared in a randomized pharmacokinetic study.
Bioequivalence was not shown for AUCnorm, which was significantly larger for the new HFC.
Increases in clot strength were comparable, and no thromboses or deaths occurred in the study.

Summary

Background
Human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) corrects fibrinogen deficiency in congenital a‐/hypofibrinogenemia.

Objectives
To assess pharmacokinetics (PK), effects on thromboelastometry maximum clot firmness (MCF), and safety of a new double virus‐inactivated/eliminated, highly purified HFC vs. active control.

Patients/Methods
In this multinational, randomized, phase II, open‐label, crossover study in 22 congenital afibrinogenemia patients aged ≥ 12 years, 70 mg kg−1 of new HFC (FIBRYGA, Octapharma AG) or control (Haemocomplettan® P/RiaSTAP™, CSL Behring GmbH) were administered, followed by crossover to the other concentrate. Fibrinogen activity, PK and MCF in plasma were assessed.

Results
The concentrates were not bioequivalent for the primary endpoint, AUCnorm (mean ratio, 1.196; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.117, 1.281). Remaining PK parameters (Cmaxnorm, IVR, t1/2, MRT) reflected bioequivalence between concentrates, except for clearance (mean ratio, 0.836; 90% CI, 0.781, 0.895) and Vss (mean ratio, 0.886; 90% CI, 0.791, 0.994). Mean AUCnorm was significantly larger for the new HFC (1.62 ± 0.45 vs. 1.38 ± 0.47 h kg g L−1 mg−1, P = 0.0001) and mean clearance was significantly slower (0.665 ± 0.197 vs. 0.804 ± 0.255 mL h−1 kg−1, P = 0.0002). Mean MCF increased from 0 mm to 9.68 mm (new HFC) and 10.00 mm (control) 1‐hour post‐infusion (mean difference, −0.32 mm; 95% CI, −1.70, 1.07, n.s.). No deaths, thromboses, viral seroconversions or serious related adverse events occurred.

Conclusions
Bioequivalence was not demonstrated for AUCnorm, clearance and Vss. Larger AUCnorm and slower clearance were observed for the new HFC. Remaining pharmacokinetic parameters reflected bioequivalence to control. Safety profiles and increases in clot strength were comparable between concentrates.
1538-7933
253-261
Ross, C.
c2d5bc9f-74ad-4c9f-926e-637ec983543c
Rangarajan, S.
9a5e4c7e-55ba-4a3a-b5f6-f1e269d927c3
Karimi, M.
2a8d30f6-4206-4f26-8a0a-9de34d8cb28e
Toogeh, G.
5687fe85-b40b-4db4-99fc-4de50150f156
Apte, S.
5b05deb6-8fdc-4380-a722-24111f738695
Lissitchkov, T.
8d7393d2-abb5-4214-a611-61c69433a115
Acharya, S.
a03ee5f9-9b26-42c3-997f-948ac0d68154
Manco-johnson, M. J.
40b0d4df-77e5-48cc-ae59-260890a27b3f
Srivastava, A.
47c1869c-1800-4b47-acfd-ffaec2bc54f9
Brand, B.
70e6687e-addf-4b1a-ba8f-651eba040bf5
Schwartz, B. A.
7a0d190e-d55f-498f-b1c6-d0f88d253d7c
Knaub, S.
01e79fc9-fb41-4fb6-8498-534b56e06cb0
Peyvandi, F.
0434f776-6626-42ba-bf18-9381525f6bc1
Ross, C.
c2d5bc9f-74ad-4c9f-926e-637ec983543c
Rangarajan, S.
9a5e4c7e-55ba-4a3a-b5f6-f1e269d927c3
Karimi, M.
2a8d30f6-4206-4f26-8a0a-9de34d8cb28e
Toogeh, G.
5687fe85-b40b-4db4-99fc-4de50150f156
Apte, S.
5b05deb6-8fdc-4380-a722-24111f738695
Lissitchkov, T.
8d7393d2-abb5-4214-a611-61c69433a115
Acharya, S.
a03ee5f9-9b26-42c3-997f-948ac0d68154
Manco-johnson, M. J.
40b0d4df-77e5-48cc-ae59-260890a27b3f
Srivastava, A.
47c1869c-1800-4b47-acfd-ffaec2bc54f9
Brand, B.
70e6687e-addf-4b1a-ba8f-651eba040bf5
Schwartz, B. A.
7a0d190e-d55f-498f-b1c6-d0f88d253d7c
Knaub, S.
01e79fc9-fb41-4fb6-8498-534b56e06cb0
Peyvandi, F.
0434f776-6626-42ba-bf18-9381525f6bc1

Ross, C., Rangarajan, S., Karimi, M., Toogeh, G., Apte, S., Lissitchkov, T., Acharya, S., Manco-johnson, M. J., Srivastava, A., Brand, B., Schwartz, B. A., Knaub, S. and Peyvandi, F. (2018) Pharmacokinetics, clot strength and safety of a new fibrinogen concentrate: randomized comparison with active control in congenital fibrinogen deficiency. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 16 (2), 253-261. (doi:10.1111/jth.13923).

Record type: Article

Abstract


Essentials

Congenital afibrinogenemia causes a potentially life‐threatening bleeding and clotting tendency.
Two human fibrinogen concentrates (HFCs) were compared in a randomized pharmacokinetic study.
Bioequivalence was not shown for AUCnorm, which was significantly larger for the new HFC.
Increases in clot strength were comparable, and no thromboses or deaths occurred in the study.

Summary

Background
Human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) corrects fibrinogen deficiency in congenital a‐/hypofibrinogenemia.

Objectives
To assess pharmacokinetics (PK), effects on thromboelastometry maximum clot firmness (MCF), and safety of a new double virus‐inactivated/eliminated, highly purified HFC vs. active control.

Patients/Methods
In this multinational, randomized, phase II, open‐label, crossover study in 22 congenital afibrinogenemia patients aged ≥ 12 years, 70 mg kg−1 of new HFC (FIBRYGA, Octapharma AG) or control (Haemocomplettan® P/RiaSTAP™, CSL Behring GmbH) were administered, followed by crossover to the other concentrate. Fibrinogen activity, PK and MCF in plasma were assessed.

Results
The concentrates were not bioequivalent for the primary endpoint, AUCnorm (mean ratio, 1.196; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.117, 1.281). Remaining PK parameters (Cmaxnorm, IVR, t1/2, MRT) reflected bioequivalence between concentrates, except for clearance (mean ratio, 0.836; 90% CI, 0.781, 0.895) and Vss (mean ratio, 0.886; 90% CI, 0.791, 0.994). Mean AUCnorm was significantly larger for the new HFC (1.62 ± 0.45 vs. 1.38 ± 0.47 h kg g L−1 mg−1, P = 0.0001) and mean clearance was significantly slower (0.665 ± 0.197 vs. 0.804 ± 0.255 mL h−1 kg−1, P = 0.0002). Mean MCF increased from 0 mm to 9.68 mm (new HFC) and 10.00 mm (control) 1‐hour post‐infusion (mean difference, −0.32 mm; 95% CI, −1.70, 1.07, n.s.). No deaths, thromboses, viral seroconversions or serious related adverse events occurred.

Conclusions
Bioequivalence was not demonstrated for AUCnorm, clearance and Vss. Larger AUCnorm and slower clearance were observed for the new HFC. Remaining pharmacokinetic parameters reflected bioequivalence to control. Safety profiles and increases in clot strength were comparable between concentrates.

Text
jth.13923
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 November 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 December 2017
Published date: 1 February 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 442852
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/442852
ISSN: 1538-7933
PURE UUID: f7784fe6-f288-42e7-98e0-91391e8e0431
ORCID for S. Rangarajan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-133X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jul 2020 16:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Ross
Author: S. Rangarajan ORCID iD
Author: M. Karimi
Author: G. Toogeh
Author: S. Apte
Author: T. Lissitchkov
Author: S. Acharya
Author: M. J. Manco-johnson
Author: A. Srivastava
Author: B. Brand
Author: B. A. Schwartz
Author: S. Knaub
Author: F. Peyvandi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×