Multiobjective tuning of GENIE Earth system models
Multiobjective tuning of GENIE Earth system models
In order to simulate at the multi-decadal time scale and beyond, climate models rely heavily on parameterisations of physical processes that occur on comparatively small time and spatial scales. A key concern in climate modelling is therefore to find appropriate values for these parameters so that a reasonable climatology is simulated. This is of particularly importance within the GENIE modelling framework where component codes, that are often developed independently, are coupled together to form new Earth system models. In order to produce stable and sensible model output it is almost always necessary to re-tune the parameters of the coupled system. However, as with many design problems, the nonlinear response of a model to its parameters and the often conflicting tuning objectives make this a difficult problem to solve.
The general problem of optimising a set of model parameters in order to improve a number of possibly conflicting design objectives is typically approached in one of two ways. One can create a single objective measure of design quality by computing a weighted sum of the individual objectives and seek to find the set of variables that minimise or maximise this measure. Many sophisticated algorithms can be applied to a single objective problem but the weighting factors can be critical in the performance of the optimisation. Alternatively, multiobjective methods can be employed to seek a Pareto set of non-dominated solutions; designs that are superior when all objective measures are considered but that may be inferior when a subset of those objectives are considered. Such a solution set can inform the user of competition in the design goals and allows domain expertise to be applied to select the most appropriate parameter sets for further study.
We present the results of applying a multiobjective Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) to tune two models from the GENIE framework. The genie_eb-
go-gs (3D frictional geostrophic ocean model, 2D energy moisture balance model and 2D sea-ice) and genie-ig-fi-fi-ml (3D atmosphere, 2D fixed ocean and sea-ice and land surface) models are tuned to appropriate target data sets by minimising multiple measures of model-data mismatch across different physical fields. Grid computing is exploited to perform the large number of concurrent simulations that comprise the generations of the algorithm. Recent advances in the method use Response Surface Modelling (RSM) to provide surrogate models of the underlying objective functions. These RSMs can be searched much more cheaply and extensively to provide considerable performance improvements in the optimisation.
10551
Price, A.R.
15a6667c-60da-42e9-b6dd-4c0e56c33c52
Voutchkov, I.I.
16640210-6d07-49cc-aebd-28bf89c7ac27
Edwards, N.R.
e41b719b-784e-4748-acc4-6ccbc4643c7d
Hughes, J.K.
b6195911-46c3-460b-b5fc-37b6ac7a61cd
Lunt, D.J.
5bfca8db-49a7-45dd-9855-43606a58788b
Lenton, T.M.
f2b4fe3d-ef5e-4c85-9677-bfc20c266b65
Valdes, P.J.
7b271d19-a4cb-4fc3-af4e-6745239c01d8
Cox, S.J.
0e62aaed-24ad-4a74-b996-f606e40e5c55
2007
Price, A.R.
15a6667c-60da-42e9-b6dd-4c0e56c33c52
Voutchkov, I.I.
16640210-6d07-49cc-aebd-28bf89c7ac27
Edwards, N.R.
e41b719b-784e-4748-acc4-6ccbc4643c7d
Hughes, J.K.
b6195911-46c3-460b-b5fc-37b6ac7a61cd
Lunt, D.J.
5bfca8db-49a7-45dd-9855-43606a58788b
Lenton, T.M.
f2b4fe3d-ef5e-4c85-9677-bfc20c266b65
Valdes, P.J.
7b271d19-a4cb-4fc3-af4e-6745239c01d8
Cox, S.J.
0e62aaed-24ad-4a74-b996-f606e40e5c55
Price, A.R., Voutchkov, I.I., Edwards, N.R., Hughes, J.K., Lunt, D.J., Lenton, T.M., Valdes, P.J. and Cox, S.J.
(2007)
Multiobjective tuning of GENIE Earth system models.
Geophysical Research Abstracts, 9, .
Abstract
In order to simulate at the multi-decadal time scale and beyond, climate models rely heavily on parameterisations of physical processes that occur on comparatively small time and spatial scales. A key concern in climate modelling is therefore to find appropriate values for these parameters so that a reasonable climatology is simulated. This is of particularly importance within the GENIE modelling framework where component codes, that are often developed independently, are coupled together to form new Earth system models. In order to produce stable and sensible model output it is almost always necessary to re-tune the parameters of the coupled system. However, as with many design problems, the nonlinear response of a model to its parameters and the often conflicting tuning objectives make this a difficult problem to solve.
The general problem of optimising a set of model parameters in order to improve a number of possibly conflicting design objectives is typically approached in one of two ways. One can create a single objective measure of design quality by computing a weighted sum of the individual objectives and seek to find the set of variables that minimise or maximise this measure. Many sophisticated algorithms can be applied to a single objective problem but the weighting factors can be critical in the performance of the optimisation. Alternatively, multiobjective methods can be employed to seek a Pareto set of non-dominated solutions; designs that are superior when all objective measures are considered but that may be inferior when a subset of those objectives are considered. Such a solution set can inform the user of competition in the design goals and allows domain expertise to be applied to select the most appropriate parameter sets for further study.
We present the results of applying a multiobjective Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) to tune two models from the GENIE framework. The genie_eb-
go-gs (3D frictional geostrophic ocean model, 2D energy moisture balance model and 2D sea-ice) and genie-ig-fi-fi-ml (3D atmosphere, 2D fixed ocean and sea-ice and land surface) models are tuned to appropriate target data sets by minimising multiple measures of model-data mismatch across different physical fields. Grid computing is exploited to perform the large number of concurrent simulations that comprise the generations of the algorithm. Recent advances in the method use Response Surface Modelling (RSM) to provide surrogate models of the underlying objective functions. These RSMs can be searched much more cheaply and extensively to provide considerable performance improvements in the optimisation.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 44290
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/44290
ISSN: 1029-7006
PURE UUID: e62c7e54-fccb-44d0-9a20-fd711fb5e2ad
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Feb 2007
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 20:52
Export record
Contributors
Author:
A.R. Price
Author:
N.R. Edwards
Author:
J.K. Hughes
Author:
D.J. Lunt
Author:
T.M. Lenton
Author:
P.J. Valdes
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics