Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'
Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'
At crucial junctures in the development of his concept of ‘authenticity’, Heidegger discusses at length Aristotle’s concept of ‘phronêsis’; and there is a widely-held suspicion that those discussions shape that development. The present paper examines that suspicion in the light of an apparent tension in Aristotle’s texts between understanding phronêsis as a perceptual capacity and understanding it as a deliberative capacity. Bronwyn Finnigan has argued that some influential, recent Heideggerian scholarship on this topic emphasises the perceptual and downplays the deliberative, and there is evidence in Heidegger’s texts that might suggest he does too. The present paper, however, offers an alternative to this perceptually-focused reading, which I call ‘the all-things-considered judgment reading’. It understands the exercise of phronêsis, and the authenticity which Heidegger models upon it, as deliberative feats, accommodates the evidence thought to support the perceptually-focused reading, and avoids philosophical objections that the latter reading’s understanding invites.
Aristotle, Authenticity, Deliberation, Heidegger, Perception, Phronêsis
125-153
Mcmanus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24
January 2022
Mcmanus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24
Mcmanus, Denis
(2022)
Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'.
Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60 (1), .
(doi:10.1353/hph.2022.0005).
Abstract
At crucial junctures in the development of his concept of ‘authenticity’, Heidegger discusses at length Aristotle’s concept of ‘phronêsis’; and there is a widely-held suspicion that those discussions shape that development. The present paper examines that suspicion in the light of an apparent tension in Aristotle’s texts between understanding phronêsis as a perceptual capacity and understanding it as a deliberative capacity. Bronwyn Finnigan has argued that some influential, recent Heideggerian scholarship on this topic emphasises the perceptual and downplays the deliberative, and there is evidence in Heidegger’s texts that might suggest he does too. The present paper, however, offers an alternative to this perceptually-focused reading, which I call ‘the all-things-considered judgment reading’. It understands the exercise of phronêsis, and the authenticity which Heidegger models upon it, as deliberative feats, accommodates the evidence thought to support the perceptually-focused reading, and avoids philosophical objections that the latter reading’s understanding invites.
Text
Authenticity, deliberation and perception - final
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 July 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 January 2022
Published date: January 2022
Additional Information:
Copyright © 2022 Journal of the History of Philosophy, Inc
Keywords:
Aristotle, Authenticity, Deliberation, Heidegger, Perception, Phronêsis
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 443185
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443185
ISSN: 1538-4586
PURE UUID: 94866490-9741-4844-9d25-7236a0cd2da0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Aug 2020 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics