The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'

Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'
Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'
At crucial junctures in the development of his concept of ‘authenticity’, Heidegger discusses at length Aristotle’s concept of ‘phronêsis’; and there is a widely-held suspicion that those discussions shape that development. The present paper examines that suspicion in the light of an apparent tension in Aristotle’s texts between understanding phronêsis as a perceptual capacity and understanding it as a deliberative capacity. Bronwyn Finnigan has argued that some influential, recent Heideggerian scholarship on this topic emphasises the perceptual and downplays the deliberative, and there is evidence in Heidegger’s texts that might suggest he does too. The present paper, however, offers an alternative to this perceptually-focused reading, which I call ‘the all-things-considered judgment reading’. It understands the exercise of phronêsis, and the authenticity which Heidegger models upon it, as deliberative feats, accommodates the evidence thought to support the perceptually-focused reading, and avoids philosophical objections that the latter reading’s understanding invites.
Aristotle, Authenticity, Deliberation, Heidegger, Perception, Phronêsis
1538-4586
125-153
Mcmanus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24
Mcmanus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24

Mcmanus, Denis (2022) Authenticity, deliberation and perception: On Heidegger’s reading and appropriation of Aristotle’s concept of 'phronêsis'. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60 (1), 125-153. (doi:10.1353/hph.2022.0005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

At crucial junctures in the development of his concept of ‘authenticity’, Heidegger discusses at length Aristotle’s concept of ‘phronêsis’; and there is a widely-held suspicion that those discussions shape that development. The present paper examines that suspicion in the light of an apparent tension in Aristotle’s texts between understanding phronêsis as a perceptual capacity and understanding it as a deliberative capacity. Bronwyn Finnigan has argued that some influential, recent Heideggerian scholarship on this topic emphasises the perceptual and downplays the deliberative, and there is evidence in Heidegger’s texts that might suggest he does too. The present paper, however, offers an alternative to this perceptually-focused reading, which I call ‘the all-things-considered judgment reading’. It understands the exercise of phronêsis, and the authenticity which Heidegger models upon it, as deliberative feats, accommodates the evidence thought to support the perceptually-focused reading, and avoids philosophical objections that the latter reading’s understanding invites.

Text
Authenticity, deliberation and perception - final - Accepted Manuscript
Download (84kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 July 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 January 2022
Published date: January 2022
Additional Information: Copyright © 2022 Journal of the History of Philosophy, Inc
Keywords: Aristotle, Authenticity, Deliberation, Heidegger, Perception, Phronêsis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 443185
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443185
ISSN: 1538-4586
PURE UUID: 94866490-9741-4844-9d25-7236a0cd2da0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2020 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×