Analysing large volumes of complex qualitative data: Reflections from a group of international experts
Analysing large volumes of complex qualitative data: Reflections from a group of international experts
This working paper brings together the reflections of a wide range of international researchers to explore, showcase and reflect critically on the potentials and challenges of analysing large volumes of complex qualitative, and qualitative longitudinal (QLR) data, including archived material. Big Qual analysis is a new area for qualitative work and there is little guidance on how best to work with masses of qualitative material. The working paper comprises a set of blogs housed in the ‘Big Qual Analysis Resource Hub’ (http://bigqlr.ncrm.ac.uk/). We created this website to map the progress of our ESRC National Centre for Research Methods research project ‘Working across qualitative longitudinal studies: a feasibility study looking at care and intimacy’ (2015-2019). As part of the project we developed procedures for working with multiple sets of in-depth temporal qualitative data (see Davidson et al. 2019; Edwards et al. 2019 for discussion of our methodological findings). We have gathered together and made available the 27 blog post reflections from 32 authors in this working paper form because accounts of data management and analysis in qualitative research are often sanitised by the time they reach academic journals. Here, our contributors document and share publicly the trials and tribulations, intellectual commitments, contingencies and decision-making processes underlying such analysis, contributing to debates around good practice. We hope that this collection of reflections will promote further conversations about analysis/secondary analysis across large scale and/or multiple qualitative data sets. With guest posts from international scholars, from early career through to established researchers, on topics as varied as the ethics of using Big Qual data, using secondary qualitative material and computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, this collection of reflections profiles the diversity of work taking place internationally.
National Centre for Research Methods, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton
Weller, Susan
6ad1e079-1a7c-41bf-8678-bff11c55142b
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Jamieson, Lynn
0d0af4c3-c847-4134-976c-c58831bcc11f
Davidson, Emma
4f0d1aa4-686b-40c8-9977-8212deb84ff5
11 April 2019
Weller, Susan
6ad1e079-1a7c-41bf-8678-bff11c55142b
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Jamieson, Lynn
0d0af4c3-c847-4134-976c-c58831bcc11f
Davidson, Emma
4f0d1aa4-686b-40c8-9977-8212deb84ff5
Weller, Susan, Edwards, Rosalind, Jamieson, Lynn and Davidson, Emma
(2019)
Analysing large volumes of complex qualitative data: Reflections from a group of international experts
National Centre for Research Methods, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton
67pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
This working paper brings together the reflections of a wide range of international researchers to explore, showcase and reflect critically on the potentials and challenges of analysing large volumes of complex qualitative, and qualitative longitudinal (QLR) data, including archived material. Big Qual analysis is a new area for qualitative work and there is little guidance on how best to work with masses of qualitative material. The working paper comprises a set of blogs housed in the ‘Big Qual Analysis Resource Hub’ (http://bigqlr.ncrm.ac.uk/). We created this website to map the progress of our ESRC National Centre for Research Methods research project ‘Working across qualitative longitudinal studies: a feasibility study looking at care and intimacy’ (2015-2019). As part of the project we developed procedures for working with multiple sets of in-depth temporal qualitative data (see Davidson et al. 2019; Edwards et al. 2019 for discussion of our methodological findings). We have gathered together and made available the 27 blog post reflections from 32 authors in this working paper form because accounts of data management and analysis in qualitative research are often sanitised by the time they reach academic journals. Here, our contributors document and share publicly the trials and tribulations, intellectual commitments, contingencies and decision-making processes underlying such analysis, contributing to debates around good practice. We hope that this collection of reflections will promote further conversations about analysis/secondary analysis across large scale and/or multiple qualitative data sets. With guest posts from international scholars, from early career through to established researchers, on topics as varied as the ethics of using Big Qual data, using secondary qualitative material and computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, this collection of reflections profiles the diversity of work taking place internationally.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 11 April 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 443376
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443376
PURE UUID: 4cbefec5-8ee1-49a3-bec0-6413039ab1b5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Aug 2020 16:30
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 01:50
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Susan Weller
Author:
Lynn Jamieson
Author:
Emma Davidson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics