The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis

Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis
Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis
Gambling Disorder is a prevalent psychiatric condition often linked to dysfunction of cognitive domains regulating impulsive behavior. Despite the centrality of impulsivity to neurobiological models of Gambling Disorder, a comprehensive meta-analysis of all impulsive cognitive domains has yet to be conducted. It is also not clear whether cognitive deficits in Gambling Disorder extend to those with problem (at-risk) gambling. A systematic review was undertaken of case–control studies examining the following cognitive domains in Gambling Disorder or in at-risk (problem) gambling: attentional inhibition, motor inhibition, discounting, decision-making, and reflection impulsivity. Case–control differences in cognition were identified using meta-analysis (random-effects modeling). Moderation analysis explored potential influences of age, gender, presence/absence of comorbidities in cases, geographical region, and study quality on cognitive performance. Gambling Disorder was associated with significant impairments in motor (g = 0.39–0.48) and attentional (g = 0.55) inhibition, discounting (g = 0.66), and decision-making (g = 0.63) tasks. For problem gambling, only decision-making had sufficient data for meta-analysis, yielding significant impairment versus controls (g = 0.66); however, study quality was relatively low. Insufficient data were available for meta-analysis of reflection impulsivity. There was evidence for significant publication bias only for the discounting domain, after an outlier study was excluded. Study quality overall was reasonable (mean score 71.9% of maximum), but most studies (~85%) did not screen for comorbid impulse control and related disorders. This meta-analysis indicates heightened impulsivity across a range of cognitive domains in Gambling Disorder. Decision-making impulsivity may extend to problem (at-risk) gambling, but further studies are needed to confirm such candidate cognitive vulnerability markers.
0893-133X
1354-1361
Ioannidis, Konstantinos
82240a24-3153-45bb-bfaf-c6df9cd4f261
Hook, Roxanne
8e06533d-b2ca-4adb-9639-6ee8edafb3b7
Wickham, Katie
913e7a85-c4f1-4ee2-9d8d-11b19acf5a9a
Grant, Jon E.
68b74bfc-0910-4325-aa34-24d285abfc19
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f
Ioannidis, Konstantinos
82240a24-3153-45bb-bfaf-c6df9cd4f261
Hook, Roxanne
8e06533d-b2ca-4adb-9639-6ee8edafb3b7
Wickham, Katie
913e7a85-c4f1-4ee2-9d8d-11b19acf5a9a
Grant, Jon E.
68b74bfc-0910-4325-aa34-24d285abfc19
Chamberlain, Samuel R.
8a0e09e6-f51f-4039-9287-88debe8d8b6f

Ioannidis, Konstantinos, Hook, Roxanne, Wickham, Katie, Grant, Jon E. and Chamberlain, Samuel R. (2019) Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44 (8), 1354-1361. (doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Gambling Disorder is a prevalent psychiatric condition often linked to dysfunction of cognitive domains regulating impulsive behavior. Despite the centrality of impulsivity to neurobiological models of Gambling Disorder, a comprehensive meta-analysis of all impulsive cognitive domains has yet to be conducted. It is also not clear whether cognitive deficits in Gambling Disorder extend to those with problem (at-risk) gambling. A systematic review was undertaken of case–control studies examining the following cognitive domains in Gambling Disorder or in at-risk (problem) gambling: attentional inhibition, motor inhibition, discounting, decision-making, and reflection impulsivity. Case–control differences in cognition were identified using meta-analysis (random-effects modeling). Moderation analysis explored potential influences of age, gender, presence/absence of comorbidities in cases, geographical region, and study quality on cognitive performance. Gambling Disorder was associated with significant impairments in motor (g = 0.39–0.48) and attentional (g = 0.55) inhibition, discounting (g = 0.66), and decision-making (g = 0.63) tasks. For problem gambling, only decision-making had sufficient data for meta-analysis, yielding significant impairment versus controls (g = 0.66); however, study quality was relatively low. Insufficient data were available for meta-analysis of reflection impulsivity. There was evidence for significant publication bias only for the discounting domain, after an outlier study was excluded. Study quality overall was reasonable (mean score 71.9% of maximum), but most studies (~85%) did not screen for comorbid impulse control and related disorders. This meta-analysis indicates heightened impulsivity across a range of cognitive domains in Gambling Disorder. Decision-making impulsivity may extend to problem (at-risk) gambling, but further studies are needed to confirm such candidate cognitive vulnerability markers.

Text
s41386-019-0393-9 - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 April 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 April 2019
Published date: 1 July 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 443457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443457
ISSN: 0893-133X
PURE UUID: 70e53c09-8c0d-4d85-b4d8-fa071b14247e
ORCID for Samuel R. Chamberlain: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Aug 2020 16:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Konstantinos Ioannidis
Author: Roxanne Hook
Author: Katie Wickham
Author: Jon E. Grant
Author: Samuel R. Chamberlain ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×