The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of two lipid removal methods for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis in whale tissue

Evaluation of two lipid removal methods for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis in whale tissue
Evaluation of two lipid removal methods for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis in whale tissue
Rationale
The presence of lipids in animal tissues can influence the interpretation of stable isotope data, particularly in lipid‐rich tissues such as the skin and muscle of marine mammals. The traditionally employed chloroform–methanol delipidation protocol has the potential to alter δ15N values in proteinaceous tissues. Our objective was to determine whether the use of cyclohexane could be an alternative extraction method, effectively removing lipids without altering δ15N values.

Methods
Kidney, liver, muscle, and skin samples were collected from beach‐cast Sowerby's beaked whales (Mesoplodon bidens). Control subsamples were processed without delipidation extraction, and duplicate subsamples were extracted with either chloroform–methanol or cyclohexane. δ13C, δ15N, and C:N values were determined by continuous‐flow elemental analysis isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Paired Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate the change in isotope ratios after extraction, and unpaired Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate differences in isotope ratios between extractions.

Results
Use of cyclohexane is an effective delipidation technique for tissues with low and moderate lipid content. Chemical delipidation influenced δ15N values; extracted samples generally showed an increase in δ15N values which varied from 0.0‰ to 1.7‰. Chloroform–methanol extraction resulted in alterations to δ15N values greater than the analytical precision for all analyzed tissues. Changes to δ15N values after cyclohexane extraction were at or near the analytical precision for liver and muscle but greater than the analytical precision for kidney and skin.

Conclusions
We recommend processing duplicate subsamples for stable isotope analysis, one with and one without extraction, in order to obtain accurate values for each isotope ratio. Prolonged chemical extractions are not necessary to effectively remove lipids. When samples are limited, we suggest using cyclohexane for tissues with low or moderate lipid content, and chloroform–methanol for lipid‐rich tissues.
0951-4198
e8851
Smith, Kerri J.
87363319-9dc8-44fd-80f9-7218035cccd1
Trueman, Clive N.
d00d3bd6-a47b-4d47-89ae-841c3d506205
France, Christine A.m.
15898d3f-d7f7-4339-b785-63e93d57f59f
Peterson, Markus J.
3afcb5c3-9c5b-448f-b4af-4625d5c0a259
Smith, Kerri J.
87363319-9dc8-44fd-80f9-7218035cccd1
Trueman, Clive N.
d00d3bd6-a47b-4d47-89ae-841c3d506205
France, Christine A.m.
15898d3f-d7f7-4339-b785-63e93d57f59f
Peterson, Markus J.
3afcb5c3-9c5b-448f-b4af-4625d5c0a259

Smith, Kerri J., Trueman, Clive N., France, Christine A.m. and Peterson, Markus J. (2020) Evaluation of two lipid removal methods for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis in whale tissue. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 34 (18), e8851, [e8851]. (doi:10.1002/rcm.8851).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Rationale
The presence of lipids in animal tissues can influence the interpretation of stable isotope data, particularly in lipid‐rich tissues such as the skin and muscle of marine mammals. The traditionally employed chloroform–methanol delipidation protocol has the potential to alter δ15N values in proteinaceous tissues. Our objective was to determine whether the use of cyclohexane could be an alternative extraction method, effectively removing lipids without altering δ15N values.

Methods
Kidney, liver, muscle, and skin samples were collected from beach‐cast Sowerby's beaked whales (Mesoplodon bidens). Control subsamples were processed without delipidation extraction, and duplicate subsamples were extracted with either chloroform–methanol or cyclohexane. δ13C, δ15N, and C:N values were determined by continuous‐flow elemental analysis isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Paired Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate the change in isotope ratios after extraction, and unpaired Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate differences in isotope ratios between extractions.

Results
Use of cyclohexane is an effective delipidation technique for tissues with low and moderate lipid content. Chemical delipidation influenced δ15N values; extracted samples generally showed an increase in δ15N values which varied from 0.0‰ to 1.7‰. Chloroform–methanol extraction resulted in alterations to δ15N values greater than the analytical precision for all analyzed tissues. Changes to δ15N values after cyclohexane extraction were at or near the analytical precision for liver and muscle but greater than the analytical precision for kidney and skin.

Conclusions
We recommend processing duplicate subsamples for stable isotope analysis, one with and one without extraction, in order to obtain accurate values for each isotope ratio. Prolonged chemical extractions are not necessary to effectively remove lipids. When samples are limited, we suggest using cyclohexane for tissues with low or moderate lipid content, and chloroform–methanol for lipid‐rich tissues.

Text
Smith Kerri J Treatment Methods revised CT - Accepted Manuscript
Download (276kB)
Text
SmithKerriJ_TreatmentMethods_revised_CT
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 June 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 June 2020
Published date: 30 September 2020
Additional Information: © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 443682
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443682
ISSN: 0951-4198
PURE UUID: ed6a4219-65f7-4d97-8569-5d6d5224099a
ORCID for Clive N. Trueman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-736X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kerri J. Smith
Author: Christine A.m. France
Author: Markus J. Peterson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×