Audit adjustments and public sector audit quality
Audit adjustments and public sector audit quality
In the context of austerity-inspired reforms to public audit in England we investigate the extent to which audit firms mitigate management bias in public sector financial reports. A substantial body of literature finds that both public and not-for-profit managers manage ‘earnings’ to report small surpluses close to zero by managing deficits upwards and surpluses downwards. Under agency theory, auditors acting in the interests of their principal(s) would tend to reverse this bias. We exploit privileged access to pre-audit financial statements in the setting of the English National Health Service (NHS) to investigate the impact of audit adjustments on the pre-audit financial statements of English NHS Foundation Trusts over the period 2010–2011 to 2014–2015. We find evidence that auditors act to reverse management bias in the case of Trusts with a pre-audit deficit, but find no evidence that this is the case for Trusts with a pre-audit surplus. In the case of Trusts in surplus, these findings are consistent with auditors’ interests being aligned with management, rather than principals.
Agency, Audit adjustments, Audit quality, Earnings management, Financial reporting quality, Public sector
511-534
Greenwood, Margaret
bb57c351-391d-4817-b3cd-d111db7919d9
Zhan, Ruijia
45597d91-17d0-4aac-941f-951b118b2b8d
1 September 2019
Greenwood, Margaret
bb57c351-391d-4817-b3cd-d111db7919d9
Zhan, Ruijia
45597d91-17d0-4aac-941f-951b118b2b8d
Greenwood, Margaret and Zhan, Ruijia
(2019)
Audit adjustments and public sector audit quality.
Abacus, 55 (3), .
(doi:10.1111/abac.12165).
Abstract
In the context of austerity-inspired reforms to public audit in England we investigate the extent to which audit firms mitigate management bias in public sector financial reports. A substantial body of literature finds that both public and not-for-profit managers manage ‘earnings’ to report small surpluses close to zero by managing deficits upwards and surpluses downwards. Under agency theory, auditors acting in the interests of their principal(s) would tend to reverse this bias. We exploit privileged access to pre-audit financial statements in the setting of the English National Health Service (NHS) to investigate the impact of audit adjustments on the pre-audit financial statements of English NHS Foundation Trusts over the period 2010–2011 to 2014–2015. We find evidence that auditors act to reverse management bias in the case of Trusts with a pre-audit deficit, but find no evidence that this is the case for Trusts with a pre-audit surplus. In the case of Trusts in surplus, these findings are consistent with auditors’ interests being aligned with management, rather than principals.
Text
Greenwood and Zhan 2019
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 4 June 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 July 2019
Published date: 1 September 2019
Keywords:
Agency, Audit adjustments, Audit quality, Earnings management, Financial reporting quality, Public sector
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 443882
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/443882
ISSN: 0001-3072
PURE UUID: 30581796-54c9-4b97-97b3-3426da5e96fe
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2020 16:33
Last modified: 05 Jun 2024 20:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Margaret Greenwood
Author:
Ruijia Zhan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics