Why the patient-made term 'Long Covid' is needed
Why the patient-made term 'Long Covid' is needed
The patient-made term ‘Long Covid’ is, we argue, a helpful and capacious term that is needed to address key medical, epidemiological and socio-political challenges posed by diverse symptoms persisting beyond four weeks after symptom onset suggestive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An international movement of patients (which includes all six authors) brought the persistence and heterogeneity of long-term symptoms to widespread visibility. The same grassroots movement introduced the term ‘Long Covid’ (and the cognate term ‘long-haulers’) to intervene in relation to widespread assumptions about disease severity and duration. Persistent symptoms following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are now one of the most pressing clinical and public health phenomena to address: their cause(s) is/are unknown, their effects can be debilitating, and the percentage of patients affected is unclear, though likely significant. The term ‘Long Covid’ is now used in scientific literature, the media, and in interactions with the WHO. Uncertainty regarding its value and meaning, however, remains. In this Open Letter, we explain the advantages of the term ‘Long Covid’ and bring clarity to some pressing issues of use and definition. We also point to the importance of centring patient experience and expertise in relation to ‘Long Covid’ research, as well as the provision of care and rehabilitation.
Keywords
Perego, Elisa
dd250510-b5d5-4cf4-a44e-022db86ec881
Callard, Felicity
f6305827-ea18-4af5-b13b-0fef099d19b7
Stras, Laurie
b1021221-b68d-4a48-bf3c-890e5a63438a
Melville-Jóhannesson, Barbara
a006c214-1e6d-4002-ab6f-0eb124b91088
Pope, Rachel
b42fab6b-a305-48ed-bd5c-6941e888d56d
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
24 September 2020
Perego, Elisa
dd250510-b5d5-4cf4-a44e-022db86ec881
Callard, Felicity
f6305827-ea18-4af5-b13b-0fef099d19b7
Stras, Laurie
b1021221-b68d-4a48-bf3c-890e5a63438a
Melville-Jóhannesson, Barbara
a006c214-1e6d-4002-ab6f-0eb124b91088
Pope, Rachel
b42fab6b-a305-48ed-bd5c-6941e888d56d
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Perego, Elisa, Callard, Felicity, Stras, Laurie, Melville-Jóhannesson, Barbara, Pope, Rachel and Alwan, Nisreen A.
(2020)
Why the patient-made term 'Long Covid' is needed.
Wellcome Open Research, 5, [224].
(doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16307.1).
Abstract
The patient-made term ‘Long Covid’ is, we argue, a helpful and capacious term that is needed to address key medical, epidemiological and socio-political challenges posed by diverse symptoms persisting beyond four weeks after symptom onset suggestive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An international movement of patients (which includes all six authors) brought the persistence and heterogeneity of long-term symptoms to widespread visibility. The same grassroots movement introduced the term ‘Long Covid’ (and the cognate term ‘long-haulers’) to intervene in relation to widespread assumptions about disease severity and duration. Persistent symptoms following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are now one of the most pressing clinical and public health phenomena to address: their cause(s) is/are unknown, their effects can be debilitating, and the percentage of patients affected is unclear, though likely significant. The term ‘Long Covid’ is now used in scientific literature, the media, and in interactions with the WHO. Uncertainty regarding its value and meaning, however, remains. In this Open Letter, we explain the advantages of the term ‘Long Covid’ and bring clarity to some pressing issues of use and definition. We also point to the importance of centring patient experience and expertise in relation to ‘Long Covid’ research, as well as the provision of care and rehabilitation.
Keywords
Text
11db4698-9cd5-4fa6-9e64-566c7f9c6fbf 16307 felicity callard
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 September 2020
Published date: 24 September 2020
Additional Information:
version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 444187
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444187
ISSN: 2398-502X
PURE UUID: 58771552-dc9e-4cf2-8e0a-ea06e575ec90
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Sep 2020 17:04
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Elisa Perego
Author:
Felicity Callard
Author:
Barbara Melville-Jóhannesson
Author:
Rachel Pope
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics