The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Development of a core outcome set to evaluate physical activity Interventions for people living with dementia

Development of a core outcome set to evaluate physical activity Interventions for people living with dementia
Development of a core outcome set to evaluate physical activity Interventions for people living with dementia
Research on physical activity interventions for people living with dementia has increased in the last decade. However, literature reviews report limitations in comparing studies due to their heterogeneous selection of outcomes. Therefore, guidance for practice is yet to be established. This thesis aimed to develop a Core Outcome Set – an agreed set of outcomes to be measured, as a minimum, in all effectiveness trials – to evaluate physical activity interventions for people living with dementia, across stages of the disease, intervention settings, in research and practice.

A systematic literature review identified a total of 133 outcomes reported in physical activity interventions for people living with dementia. A qualitative study with key stakeholders (patients, informal carers and professionals) added ten new outcomes to those previously reported. This qualitative study also identified that physical activity was meaningful to patients, not only because of its potential physiological and wellbeing benefits, but also for its impact on identity, perceived roles towards others and connections to the present. A consensus study (modified Delphi survey) was then conducted to reach agreement on the minimum set of core outcomes. Informed by patient and public involvement activities, people living with dementia were included in the consensus process through an innovative card sorting strategy. Consensus was reached on seven outcomes: “preventing falls”; “doing what you can do”; “staying healthy and fit”; “walking better, being able to stand up and climb stairs”; “feeling brighter”; “enjoying the moment”; and, “feeling useful and having a purpose”. However, physical activity may incur side effects and does not happen in isolation from informal carers. A prioritisation exercise was, therefore, completed with professionals and carers, which identified “becoming agitated and confused”, “falling over” and “feeling discomfort and pain” as the most undesirable negative side effects of physical activity for people living with dementia; and, “carer feeling positive and satisfied”; “carer improving wellbeing” and “making lives of carers easier”, as priority outcomes for carers.

This PhD contributes to methodological knowledge of Core Outcome Set development (through the use of mixed methods and an innovative card sorting strategy to engage people living with dementia) and informs our understanding of meaningful outcomes of physical activity for people living with dementia. These outcomes should be measured, as a minimum, in all future trials of physical activity in this population.
University of Southampton
Goncalves, Ana Carolina Vieira
ecb4863c-186b-4ecd-abac-3745fa5fcf30
Goncalves, Ana Carolina Vieira
ecb4863c-186b-4ecd-abac-3745fa5fcf30
Samuel, Dinesh
03b00738-9b9c-4c0a-a85a-cf43fc0932fc
Demain, Sara H.
09b1124d-750a-4eb1-90c7-91f5f222fc31

Goncalves, Ana Carolina Vieira (2019) Development of a core outcome set to evaluate physical activity Interventions for people living with dementia. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 247pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Research on physical activity interventions for people living with dementia has increased in the last decade. However, literature reviews report limitations in comparing studies due to their heterogeneous selection of outcomes. Therefore, guidance for practice is yet to be established. This thesis aimed to develop a Core Outcome Set – an agreed set of outcomes to be measured, as a minimum, in all effectiveness trials – to evaluate physical activity interventions for people living with dementia, across stages of the disease, intervention settings, in research and practice.

A systematic literature review identified a total of 133 outcomes reported in physical activity interventions for people living with dementia. A qualitative study with key stakeholders (patients, informal carers and professionals) added ten new outcomes to those previously reported. This qualitative study also identified that physical activity was meaningful to patients, not only because of its potential physiological and wellbeing benefits, but also for its impact on identity, perceived roles towards others and connections to the present. A consensus study (modified Delphi survey) was then conducted to reach agreement on the minimum set of core outcomes. Informed by patient and public involvement activities, people living with dementia were included in the consensus process through an innovative card sorting strategy. Consensus was reached on seven outcomes: “preventing falls”; “doing what you can do”; “staying healthy and fit”; “walking better, being able to stand up and climb stairs”; “feeling brighter”; “enjoying the moment”; and, “feeling useful and having a purpose”. However, physical activity may incur side effects and does not happen in isolation from informal carers. A prioritisation exercise was, therefore, completed with professionals and carers, which identified “becoming agitated and confused”, “falling over” and “feeling discomfort and pain” as the most undesirable negative side effects of physical activity for people living with dementia; and, “carer feeling positive and satisfied”; “carer improving wellbeing” and “making lives of carers easier”, as priority outcomes for carers.

This PhD contributes to methodological knowledge of Core Outcome Set development (through the use of mixed methods and an innovative card sorting strategy to engage people living with dementia) and informs our understanding of meaningful outcomes of physical activity for people living with dementia. These outcomes should be measured, as a minimum, in all future trials of physical activity in this population.

Text
ACV Goncalves FINAL PhD thesis - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (1MB)
Text
Permission to deposit thesis form
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 1 July 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444284
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444284
PURE UUID: cf05b623-5cf9-4914-b6ac-825031fc2773
ORCID for Ana Carolina Vieira Goncalves: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-0894
ORCID for Dinesh Samuel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-8032

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Oct 2020 16:51
Last modified: 17 Apr 2024 01:39

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ana Carolina Vieira Goncalves ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Dinesh Samuel ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Sara H. Demain

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×