Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service
Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service
Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Interview-based national survey. Setting: Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service. Population: Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology. Methods: Participants were interviewed by members of the UK Audit and Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees' collaborative between 28 March and 7 April 2020. We used a quantitative analysis for closed-ended questions and a thematic framework analysis for open comments. Results: We received responses from 148/155 units (95%), most of the participants were in years 3–7 of training (121/148, 82%). Most completed specific training drills for managing obstetric and gynaecological emergencies in women with COVID-19 (89/148, 60.1%) and two-person donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (96/148, 64.9%). The majority of surveyed units implemented COVID-19-specific protocols (130/148, 87.8%), offered adequate PPE (135/148, 91.2%) and operated dedicated COVID-19 emergency theatres (105/148, 70.8%). Most units reduced face-to-face antenatal clinics (117/148, 79.1%) and suspended elective gynaecology services (131/148, 88.5%). The 2-week referral pathway for oncological gynaecology was not affected in half of the units (76/148, 51.4%), but half reported a planned reduction in oncology surgery (82/148, 55.4%). Conclusion: The provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be in line with current guidelines, but strategic planning is needed to restore routine gynaecology services and ensure safe access to maternity care in the long term. Tweetable abstract: Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID-19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.
Coronavirus, coronavirus disease 2019, gynaecology, national health service, obstetrics, survey, women's health care
1123-1128
Rimmer, M.P.
7883e9ed-f0d5-4c0a-9e32-730fd9078a39
Al Wattar, B.H.
d1b5ec29-a660-4f8e-98a4-bb2e14ae6d10
Stocker, Linden
6990b82e-4431-4e32-8250-309d61e1a01b
on behalf of the UKARCOG Members
1 August 2020
Rimmer, M.P.
7883e9ed-f0d5-4c0a-9e32-730fd9078a39
Al Wattar, B.H.
d1b5ec29-a660-4f8e-98a4-bb2e14ae6d10
Stocker, Linden
6990b82e-4431-4e32-8250-309d61e1a01b
Rimmer, M.P. and Al Wattar, B.H.
,
on behalf of the UKARCOG Members
(2020)
Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service.
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 127 (9), .
(doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16313).
Abstract
Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Interview-based national survey. Setting: Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service. Population: Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology. Methods: Participants were interviewed by members of the UK Audit and Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees' collaborative between 28 March and 7 April 2020. We used a quantitative analysis for closed-ended questions and a thematic framework analysis for open comments. Results: We received responses from 148/155 units (95%), most of the participants were in years 3–7 of training (121/148, 82%). Most completed specific training drills for managing obstetric and gynaecological emergencies in women with COVID-19 (89/148, 60.1%) and two-person donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (96/148, 64.9%). The majority of surveyed units implemented COVID-19-specific protocols (130/148, 87.8%), offered adequate PPE (135/148, 91.2%) and operated dedicated COVID-19 emergency theatres (105/148, 70.8%). Most units reduced face-to-face antenatal clinics (117/148, 79.1%) and suspended elective gynaecology services (131/148, 88.5%). The 2-week referral pathway for oncological gynaecology was not affected in half of the units (76/148, 51.4%), but half reported a planned reduction in oncology surgery (82/148, 55.4%). Conclusion: The provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be in line with current guidelines, but strategic planning is needed to restore routine gynaecology services and ensure safe access to maternity care in the long term. Tweetable abstract: Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID-19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.
Text
1471-0528.16313
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 May 2020
Published date: 1 August 2020
Additional Information:
© 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Keywords:
Coronavirus, coronavirus disease 2019, gynaecology, national health service, obstetrics, survey, women's health care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 444487
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444487
ISSN: 1470-0328
PURE UUID: 437ab151-8a9c-4c7c-a99c-b6728492fa27
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Oct 2020 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 09:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M.P. Rimmer
Author:
B.H. Al Wattar
Author:
Linden Stocker
Corporate Author: on behalf of the UKARCOG Members
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics