Everyday political economy of human rights to health: dignity and respect as an approach to gendered inequalities and accountability
Everyday political economy of human rights to health: dignity and respect as an approach to gendered inequalities and accountability
Sexual and reproductive health needs and rights are one of the bleakest examples of (racialised) gender health inequalities in Brazil. This is so despite legal and constitutional specificity recognising the right to health as right of citizenship. In this paper we argue that a ‘performance gap’ is revealed in contradictions between what the right to health as a normative framework encourages states to do, and institutional arrangements and power relations that underpin everyday gendered inequalities in health delivery. The contribution of this article is two-fold. First, it contributes to feminist political economy accounts of the neglect of sexual and reproductive rights by adding a perspective of human dignity as an approach to gender inequalities. Second, it explores ways in which health inequalities manifest in everyday practices, and how divergent expectations of what the right to health means for professionals and for disadvantaged black women limit the capacity of healthcare to make a difference to their well-being. The article also underlines the importance of complementing legal accountability in health with mechanisms that account for prerogatives of gender justice, equality and dignity.
Brazil, Gender inequalities, dignity, everyday political economy, right to health, rights-based accountability
1-13
Riggirozzi, Pia
ed3be4f8-37e7-46a2-8242-f6495d727c22
Riggirozzi, Pia
ed3be4f8-37e7-46a2-8242-f6495d727c22
Riggirozzi, Pia
(2020)
Everyday political economy of human rights to health: dignity and respect as an approach to gendered inequalities and accountability.
New Political Economy, 0, .
(doi:10.1080/13563467.2020.1841144).
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health needs and rights are one of the bleakest examples of (racialised) gender health inequalities in Brazil. This is so despite legal and constitutional specificity recognising the right to health as right of citizenship. In this paper we argue that a ‘performance gap’ is revealed in contradictions between what the right to health as a normative framework encourages states to do, and institutional arrangements and power relations that underpin everyday gendered inequalities in health delivery. The contribution of this article is two-fold. First, it contributes to feminist political economy accounts of the neglect of sexual and reproductive rights by adding a perspective of human dignity as an approach to gender inequalities. Second, it explores ways in which health inequalities manifest in everyday practices, and how divergent expectations of what the right to health means for professionals and for disadvantaged black women limit the capacity of healthcare to make a difference to their well-being. The article also underlines the importance of complementing legal accountability in health with mechanisms that account for prerogatives of gender justice, equality and dignity.
Text
Everyday_political_economy_of_human_rights_to_health_author_details
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
ahead-of-print-13563467.2020
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 September 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 November 2020
Keywords:
Brazil, Gender inequalities, dignity, everyday political economy, right to health, rights-based accountability
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 444555
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444555
ISSN: 1356-3467
PURE UUID: f1edca5c-4949-455d-81d1-8802166eb5f3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Oct 2020 16:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics