Anchoring in economics: a meta-analysis of studies on willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept

Abstract

Anchoring is considered one of the most robust psychological phenomena in judgment and decision-making. Earlier studies produced strong and consistent evidence that anchoring is relevant for the elicitation of economic preferences, but subsequent studies found weaker and less consistent effects. We examined the economic significance of numerical anchoring by conducting a meta-analysis of 53 studies. We used the Pearson correlation coefficient between the anchor number and target response (in our case, Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept) as the primary effect size. Both fixed-effects and random effects models pointed to a moderate overall effect, smaller than the effects reported in early studies. Given some well-known limitations of our meta-analytic methodology, these results should be viewed with caution and the effect size as an upper bound. Also, meta-regression analysis indicates that non-random anchors and non-laboratory experiments were associated with higher anchoring effects, whereas selling tasks and anchors incompatible with the evaluated item were associated with lower (but often non-significant)
anchoring effects. The use of financial incentives did not have a discernible effect.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Zacharias Maniadis: orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-0835

ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics