The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attentional bias to somatosensory stimuli in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Attentional bias to somatosensory stimuli in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Attentional bias to somatosensory stimuli in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence pertaining to attentional bias for painful and nonpainful somatosensory stimuli in individuals with chronic pain. Eligible studies were identified through searches of Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms were words and phrases organised into 3 concept blocks: pain condition, cognitive process, and stimuli/paradigm. The search identified 29 eligible studies (reporting 32 eligible experiments), of which quantitative meta-analysis was possible for 16 studies (19 experiments). The meta-analysis found that chronic pain patients, excluding somatoform pain patients, showed significantly greater attentional bias to stimuli in the somatosensory modality than healthy controls (k = 9, g = 0.34). In addition, meta-analysis of studies that used a temporal order judgement task found that patients with unilateral chronic pain showed a spatial attentional bias away from somatosensory stimuli (k = 7, effect estimate = 22.43 ms) and visual stimuli (k = 2, effect estimate = 13.75 ms) on or near the painful body side. Most studies of attentional bias to the somatosensory modality recruited samples of patients with fibromyalgia, whereas most studies of spatial attentional bias assessed patients with complex regional pain syndrome. The extent to which these results generalise to other pain conditions is therefore unclear. We recommend future research test spatial and modality attentional biases across chronic pain conditions and examine the psychometric properties of attentional bias measurement paradigms for use with chronic pain populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124510.

0304-3959
332-352
Broadbent, Philippa
aec0fc9c-f7b5-43d9-bb37-5acca6088d9b
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Schoth, Daniel E.
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Broadbent, Philippa
aec0fc9c-f7b5-43d9-bb37-5acca6088d9b
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Schoth, Daniel E.
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5

Broadbent, Philippa, Liossi, Christina and Schoth, Daniel E. (2021) Attentional bias to somatosensory stimuli in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain, 162 (2), 332-352. (doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002040).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence pertaining to attentional bias for painful and nonpainful somatosensory stimuli in individuals with chronic pain. Eligible studies were identified through searches of Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms were words and phrases organised into 3 concept blocks: pain condition, cognitive process, and stimuli/paradigm. The search identified 29 eligible studies (reporting 32 eligible experiments), of which quantitative meta-analysis was possible for 16 studies (19 experiments). The meta-analysis found that chronic pain patients, excluding somatoform pain patients, showed significantly greater attentional bias to stimuli in the somatosensory modality than healthy controls (k = 9, g = 0.34). In addition, meta-analysis of studies that used a temporal order judgement task found that patients with unilateral chronic pain showed a spatial attentional bias away from somatosensory stimuli (k = 7, effect estimate = 22.43 ms) and visual stimuli (k = 2, effect estimate = 13.75 ms) on or near the painful body side. Most studies of attentional bias to the somatosensory modality recruited samples of patients with fibromyalgia, whereas most studies of spatial attentional bias assessed patients with complex regional pain syndrome. The extent to which these results generalise to other pain conditions is therefore unclear. We recommend future research test spatial and modality attentional biases across chronic pain conditions and examine the psychometric properties of attentional bias measurement paradigms for use with chronic pain populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124510.

Text
Accepted Somatosensory Attentional Bias Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (383kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 August 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 August 2020
Published date: February 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444840
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444840
ISSN: 0304-3959
PURE UUID: 89340964-e403-494f-b888-66d622ed8d4a
ORCID for Christina Liossi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-6377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×