The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prediction of mortality in critically-ill elderly trauma patients: a single centre retrospective observational study and comparison of the performance of trauma scores

Prediction of mortality in critically-ill elderly trauma patients: a single centre retrospective observational study and comparison of the performance of trauma scores
Prediction of mortality in critically-ill elderly trauma patients: a single centre retrospective observational study and comparison of the performance of trauma scores

BACKGROUND: Trauma in the elderly (≥ 65 years) population is increasing. This study compares the performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting 30-day mortality among the traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a major trauma centre.

METHODS: We collected retrospective data for all elderly trauma patients admitted to our intensive care units between January 2012 and December 2017. We assessed Injury Severity Score (ISS), Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and the Trauma Audit and Research Network's (TARN) Probability of Survival (Ps17) between survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the performance of these scoring systems.

RESULTS: There were 255 elderly trauma patients with overall 30-day survival of 76%. There was a statistically significant difference in ISS, GTOS and Ps17 scores between survivors and non-survivors (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was statistically significant for all 3, with AUROC of 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.74) for the ISS, 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.76) for the GTOS and 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.85) for the Ps17. The optimal cut-off points were ≥ 28, ≥ 142, ≤ 76.73 for ISS, GTOS and Ps17, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Both ISS and GTOS scoring systems preformed equally in predicting 30-day mortality in traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit, however neither were robust enough to utilise in clinical practise. The Ps17 performed more robustly, although was not developed for prognosticating on individual patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these scoring systems in critically-ill elderly traumatised patients, which may help to facilitate early prognostication.

Elderly, Intensive care, Outcome, Scoring, Trauma
1757-7241
Egglestone, Rebecca
64db0e24-5f71-4fe0-85f3-9fd1bf7b46c3
Sparkes, David
5a557532-f4e2-47b5-9cd9-23b040efdd6d
Dushianthan, Ahilanandan
013692a2-cf26-4278-80bd-9d8fcdb17751
Egglestone, Rebecca
64db0e24-5f71-4fe0-85f3-9fd1bf7b46c3
Sparkes, David
5a557532-f4e2-47b5-9cd9-23b040efdd6d
Dushianthan, Ahilanandan
013692a2-cf26-4278-80bd-9d8fcdb17751

Egglestone, Rebecca, Sparkes, David and Dushianthan, Ahilanandan (2020) Prediction of mortality in critically-ill elderly trauma patients: a single centre retrospective observational study and comparison of the performance of trauma scores. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 28 (1), [95]. (doi:10.1186/s13049-020-00788-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma in the elderly (≥ 65 years) population is increasing. This study compares the performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting 30-day mortality among the traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a major trauma centre.

METHODS: We collected retrospective data for all elderly trauma patients admitted to our intensive care units between January 2012 and December 2017. We assessed Injury Severity Score (ISS), Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and the Trauma Audit and Research Network's (TARN) Probability of Survival (Ps17) between survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the performance of these scoring systems.

RESULTS: There were 255 elderly trauma patients with overall 30-day survival of 76%. There was a statistically significant difference in ISS, GTOS and Ps17 scores between survivors and non-survivors (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was statistically significant for all 3, with AUROC of 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.74) for the ISS, 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.76) for the GTOS and 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.85) for the Ps17. The optimal cut-off points were ≥ 28, ≥ 142, ≤ 76.73 for ISS, GTOS and Ps17, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Both ISS and GTOS scoring systems preformed equally in predicting 30-day mortality in traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit, however neither were robust enough to utilise in clinical practise. The Ps17 performed more robustly, although was not developed for prognosticating on individual patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these scoring systems in critically-ill elderly traumatised patients, which may help to facilitate early prognostication.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 September 2020
Published date: 23 September 2020
Keywords: Elderly, Intensive care, Outcome, Scoring, Trauma

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444860
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444860
ISSN: 1757-7241
PURE UUID: a32844a9-9bf7-4c87-ae52-500dab51a4b1
ORCID for Ahilanandan Dushianthan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-3359

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2020 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rebecca Egglestone
Author: David Sparkes
Author: Ahilanandan Dushianthan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×