The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Finding common ground

Finding common ground
Finding common ground
Deliberative democrats have abandoned the ideal of consensus in favour of a range of different, more realistic alternatives. But these alternatives provide little anchorage to guide or even evaluate deliberative practice –something acutely problematic given the contemporary context of accelerating polarization in many advanced liberal democracies. In this paper, we turn to Stalnaker’s account of the ‘common ground’—the shared pool of information that is agreed upon by the parties to a discourse—to reassert a distinct ideal standard for democratic deliberation which remains malleable enough to apply across messy contexts of real-world political contestation and debate. Our account offers an appropriate normative yardstick by which to assess deliberative practices across different discursive contexts, as well as impetus for further experimentation and innovation in efforts towards democratic renewal and reform.
deliberative democracy, consensus, philosophy of language, Stalnaker, common ground
1474-8851
1-20
Morrissey, Lochlan
275fb1d0-b519-4793-86d3-42c0b5bf4844
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c
Morrissey, Lochlan
275fb1d0-b519-4793-86d3-42c0b5bf4844
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c

Morrissey, Lochlan and Boswell, John (2020) Finding common ground. European Journal of Political Theory, 1-20. (doi:10.1177/1474885120969920).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Deliberative democrats have abandoned the ideal of consensus in favour of a range of different, more realistic alternatives. But these alternatives provide little anchorage to guide or even evaluate deliberative practice –something acutely problematic given the contemporary context of accelerating polarization in many advanced liberal democracies. In this paper, we turn to Stalnaker’s account of the ‘common ground’—the shared pool of information that is agreed upon by the parties to a discourse—to reassert a distinct ideal standard for democratic deliberation which remains malleable enough to apply across messy contexts of real-world political contestation and debate. Our account offers an appropriate normative yardstick by which to assess deliberative practices across different discursive contexts, as well as impetus for further experimentation and innovation in efforts towards democratic renewal and reform.

Text
Common Ground submission Revised final - Accepted Manuscript
Download (65kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 December 2020
Keywords: deliberative democracy, consensus, philosophy of language, Stalnaker, common ground

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 444887
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/444887
ISSN: 1474-8851
PURE UUID: 8e0a537a-248e-432a-b051-8701cbf73e98
ORCID for John Boswell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-8791

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Nov 2020 17:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lochlan Morrissey
Author: John Boswell ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×