Treatment for comorbid depressive disorder or subthreshold depression in diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis
Treatment for comorbid depressive disorder or subthreshold depression in diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective
To provide an estimate of the effect of interventions on comorbid depressive disorder (MDD) or subthreshold depression in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials evaluating the outcome of depression treatments in diabetes and comorbid MDD or subthreshold symptoms published before August 2019 compared to care as usual (CAU), placebo, waiting list (WL), or active comparator treatment as in a comparative effectiveness trial (CET). Primary outcomes were depressive symptom severity and glycemic control. Cohen's d is reported.
Results
Forty-three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected, and 32 RCTs comprising 3,543 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that, compared to CAU, placebo or WL, all interventions showed a significant effect on combined outcome 0,485 (95% CI 0.360; 0.609). All interventions showed a significant effect on depression. Pharmacological treatment, group therapy, psychotherapy, and collaborative care had a significant effect on glycemic control. High baseline depression score was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c and depressive outcome. High baseline HbA1c was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c.
Conclusion
All treatments are effective for comorbid depression in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Over the last decade, new interventions with large effect sizes have been introduced, such as group-based therapy, online treatment, and exercise. Although all interventions were effective for depression, not all treatments were effective for glycemic control. Effective interventions in comorbid depressive disorder may not be as effective in comorbid subthreshold depression. Baseline depression and HbA1c scores modify the treatment effect. Based on the findings, we provide guidance for treatment depending on patient profile and desired outcome, and discuss possible avenues for further research.
Feltz-Cornelis, Christina van der
3529f714-9ed9-4dc8-8fe0-d281e28375de
Allen, Sarah F.
47477614-c2c6-491b-b7de-ac5a8b5c46e7
Holt, Richard
d54202e1-fcf6-4a17-a320-9f32d7024393
Robertson, Richard
20b02a16-10d3-41de-94d1-ad5b49575f62
Nouwen, Arie
30829da4-9c4c-4a19-8168-c07a09960d62
Sartorius, Norman
b5243890-be3e-4311-b536-e3e641476a0e
14 February 2021
Feltz-Cornelis, Christina van der
3529f714-9ed9-4dc8-8fe0-d281e28375de
Allen, Sarah F.
47477614-c2c6-491b-b7de-ac5a8b5c46e7
Holt, Richard
d54202e1-fcf6-4a17-a320-9f32d7024393
Robertson, Richard
20b02a16-10d3-41de-94d1-ad5b49575f62
Nouwen, Arie
30829da4-9c4c-4a19-8168-c07a09960d62
Sartorius, Norman
b5243890-be3e-4311-b536-e3e641476a0e
Feltz-Cornelis, Christina van der, Allen, Sarah F., Holt, Richard, Robertson, Richard, Nouwen, Arie and Sartorius, Norman
(2021)
Treatment for comorbid depressive disorder or subthreshold depression in diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brain and Behavior, [e01981].
(doi:10.1002/brb3.1981).
Abstract
Objective
To provide an estimate of the effect of interventions on comorbid depressive disorder (MDD) or subthreshold depression in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials evaluating the outcome of depression treatments in diabetes and comorbid MDD or subthreshold symptoms published before August 2019 compared to care as usual (CAU), placebo, waiting list (WL), or active comparator treatment as in a comparative effectiveness trial (CET). Primary outcomes were depressive symptom severity and glycemic control. Cohen's d is reported.
Results
Forty-three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected, and 32 RCTs comprising 3,543 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that, compared to CAU, placebo or WL, all interventions showed a significant effect on combined outcome 0,485 (95% CI 0.360; 0.609). All interventions showed a significant effect on depression. Pharmacological treatment, group therapy, psychotherapy, and collaborative care had a significant effect on glycemic control. High baseline depression score was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c and depressive outcome. High baseline HbA1c was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c.
Conclusion
All treatments are effective for comorbid depression in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Over the last decade, new interventions with large effect sizes have been introduced, such as group-based therapy, online treatment, and exercise. Although all interventions were effective for depression, not all treatments were effective for glycemic control. Effective interventions in comorbid depressive disorder may not be as effective in comorbid subthreshold depression. Baseline depression and HbA1c scores modify the treatment effect. Based on the findings, we provide guidance for treatment depending on patient profile and desired outcome, and discuss possible avenues for further research.
Text
2020 Oct 2 Diabetes and Depression papermetrefsAPPROVEDVERSION
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 November 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 December 2020
Published date: 14 February 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 445230
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445230
PURE UUID: ec68e418-0f96-44b8-93e2-3f86f13bc677
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2020 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis
Author:
Sarah F. Allen
Author:
Richard Robertson
Author:
Arie Nouwen
Author:
Norman Sartorius
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics