Institutional memory as storytelling: How networked government remembers
Institutional memory as storytelling: How networked government remembers
How do bureaucracies remember? The conventional view is that institutional memory is static and singular, the sum of recorded files and learned procedures. There is a growing body of scholarship that suggests contemporary bureaucracies are failing at this core task. This Element argues that this diagnosis misses that memories are essentially dynamic stories. They reside with people and are thus dispersed across the array of actors that make up the differentiated polity. Drawing on four policy examples from four sectors (housing, energy, family violence and justice) in three countries (the UK, Australia and New Zealand), this Element argues that treating the way institutions remember as storytelling is both empirically salient and normatively desirable. It is concluded that the current conceptualisation of institutional memory needs to be recalibrated to fit the types of policy learning practices required by modern collaborative governance.
Cambridge University Press
Corbett, Jack
ad651655-ac70-4072-a36f-92165e296ce2
Grube, Dennis
398929d8-c9bb-40dd-8fb2-d2e06ba090b4
Lovell, Heather
44cd3359-25a5-476f-8b41-9e365df8469e
Scott, Rodney
ab036a39-b13e-47dc-94f9-af5263278ccd
December 2020
Corbett, Jack
ad651655-ac70-4072-a36f-92165e296ce2
Grube, Dennis
398929d8-c9bb-40dd-8fb2-d2e06ba090b4
Lovell, Heather
44cd3359-25a5-476f-8b41-9e365df8469e
Scott, Rodney
ab036a39-b13e-47dc-94f9-af5263278ccd
Corbett, Jack, Grube, Dennis, Lovell, Heather and Scott, Rodney
(2020)
Institutional memory as storytelling: How networked government remembers
(Cambridge Elements Public and Nonprofit Administration),
Cambridge University Press, 75pp.
Abstract
How do bureaucracies remember? The conventional view is that institutional memory is static and singular, the sum of recorded files and learned procedures. There is a growing body of scholarship that suggests contemporary bureaucracies are failing at this core task. This Element argues that this diagnosis misses that memories are essentially dynamic stories. They reside with people and are thus dispersed across the array of actors that make up the differentiated polity. Drawing on four policy examples from four sectors (housing, energy, family violence and justice) in three countries (the UK, Australia and New Zealand), this Element argues that treating the way institutions remember as storytelling is both empirically salient and normatively desirable. It is concluded that the current conceptualisation of institutional memory needs to be recalibrated to fit the types of policy learning practices required by modern collaborative governance.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 October 2018
Published date: December 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 445487
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445487
PURE UUID: db51f3b7-1427-4223-8508-49b187b775f0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Dec 2020 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 10:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Dennis Grube
Author:
Heather Lovell
Author:
Rodney Scott
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics