The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

DNA adducts, detected by P-postlabelling, in DNA treated in vitro with bile from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and from unaffected controls

DNA adducts, detected by P-postlabelling, in DNA treated in vitro with bile from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and from unaffected controls
DNA adducts, detected by P-postlabelling, in DNA treated in vitro with bile from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and from unaffected controls

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a high risk of developing duodenal adenomas and carcinomas. The distribution of these neoplasms resembles mucosal exposure to bile, suggesting that bile may play a role in adenoma development. Our previous results, using DNA adducts detected by 32P-postlabelling as an index of genotoxicity, have supported this hypothesis. We found significantly higher adduct labelling in the duodenum of FAP patients than in the duodenum of control patients and significantly higher labelling in the small bowel of rats gavaged with FAP bile than in rats given control bile. We have now investigated the ability of human bile to form adducts with DNA in vitro. Bile obtained from the gallbladder of 18 FAP patients immediately before colectomy, and from 18 control patients, was incubated with salmon sperm DNA in solution at 37°C for 1 h, after which the purified DNA was analysed for DNA adducts, using the nuclease PI method of 32P-postlabelling. Relative adduct labelling values (RAL, adducts per 109 nucleotides) produced by FAP bile samples were significantly higher than RAL values produced by control bile samples (medians 197 versus 86, P = 0.0016, Mann-Whitney test). We found a consistent pattern of adduct labelling, varying in intensity between samples. Adduct spots were eluted from TLC plates and analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC. Each major spot gave several peaks that were consistent between bile samples from different patients and were similar in FAP and control bile. These results indicate that bile from FAP and control patients contains similar, directly acting genotoxic compounds but that levels are higher in FAP than in control patients. This suggests that bile from FAP patients is more genotoxk than bile from control patients. Incubation of bile with free-radical scavengers and deconjugating enzymes failed to influence adduct labelling in this system.

0143-3334
1107-1110
Scates, D. K.
b55b5026-ad2f-4c07-9c37-b2d331f7432c
Spigelman, A. D.
74e6d4b3-097b-4024-b89d-c3b4c0bd642a
Nugent, K. P.
79fcb89d-6ff2-47b8-ac2c-2afb24954456
Phillips, R. K.S.
d23a75c7-986b-4a83-87e4-e22abae5ade2
Venitt, S.
3ab83878-c6d0-49ce-9abf-b8ad830006de
Scates, D. K.
b55b5026-ad2f-4c07-9c37-b2d331f7432c
Spigelman, A. D.
74e6d4b3-097b-4024-b89d-c3b4c0bd642a
Nugent, K. P.
79fcb89d-6ff2-47b8-ac2c-2afb24954456
Phillips, R. K.S.
d23a75c7-986b-4a83-87e4-e22abae5ade2
Venitt, S.
3ab83878-c6d0-49ce-9abf-b8ad830006de

Scates, D. K., Spigelman, A. D., Nugent, K. P., Phillips, R. K.S. and Venitt, S. (1993) DNA adducts, detected by P-postlabelling, in DNA treated in vitro with bile from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and from unaffected controls. Carcinogenesis, 14 (6), 1107-1110. (doi:10.1093/carcin/14.6.1107).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a high risk of developing duodenal adenomas and carcinomas. The distribution of these neoplasms resembles mucosal exposure to bile, suggesting that bile may play a role in adenoma development. Our previous results, using DNA adducts detected by 32P-postlabelling as an index of genotoxicity, have supported this hypothesis. We found significantly higher adduct labelling in the duodenum of FAP patients than in the duodenum of control patients and significantly higher labelling in the small bowel of rats gavaged with FAP bile than in rats given control bile. We have now investigated the ability of human bile to form adducts with DNA in vitro. Bile obtained from the gallbladder of 18 FAP patients immediately before colectomy, and from 18 control patients, was incubated with salmon sperm DNA in solution at 37°C for 1 h, after which the purified DNA was analysed for DNA adducts, using the nuclease PI method of 32P-postlabelling. Relative adduct labelling values (RAL, adducts per 109 nucleotides) produced by FAP bile samples were significantly higher than RAL values produced by control bile samples (medians 197 versus 86, P = 0.0016, Mann-Whitney test). We found a consistent pattern of adduct labelling, varying in intensity between samples. Adduct spots were eluted from TLC plates and analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC. Each major spot gave several peaks that were consistent between bile samples from different patients and were similar in FAP and control bile. These results indicate that bile from FAP and control patients contains similar, directly acting genotoxic compounds but that levels are higher in FAP than in control patients. This suggests that bile from FAP patients is more genotoxk than bile from control patients. Incubation of bile with free-radical scavengers and deconjugating enzymes failed to influence adduct labelling in this system.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 June 1993

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 445592
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445592
ISSN: 0143-3334
PURE UUID: dc76bedd-0d5b-44e0-89a6-372579d3738d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Dec 2020 18:14
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 12:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D. K. Scates
Author: A. D. Spigelman
Author: K. P. Nugent
Author: R. K.S. Phillips
Author: S. Venitt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×