“The town, the town, good pit, has asses ears!”: Unstable audiences in Della Cruscan poetic conversation
“The town, the town, good pit, has asses ears!”: Unstable audiences in Della Cruscan poetic conversation
In his famously disparaging poetic retorts to the poetry of the British Della Cruscan movement, the Baviad and Mæviad, Tory satirist William Gifford made every effort to separate the readers of Della Cruscan poetry into two distinct audiences: Della Cruscan ‘writer-readers’ who read and actively responded to pieces written by other members of the coterie with poetry of their own, and the non-participating mass audience. According to Gifford, this latter audience—metonymized as ‘the Town’ in the Baviad—ignorantly follows the whims of fashion, absorbing Della Cruscan poetry, but never actually responding to it. Through an analysis of both Della Cruscan poetry and Gifford’s retorts, this paper aims to re-establish the links between these two kinds of audiences. I will argue that Gifford’s attempts to suppress these links stemmed from a deep-seated fear—fuelled by post-Revolutionary political instability—that the Della Cruscan coterie offered a platform whereby members of the mass reading audience could join their poetic conversations pseudonymously, and ultimately be granted a voice, regardless of their gender or political affiliations.
Audience, Della Crusca, Gifford, Newspaper, Poetry
235–244
Holdway, Katie
9aa3a123-4e92-4a81-a980-d7849b7bcf33
4 November 2020
Holdway, Katie
9aa3a123-4e92-4a81-a980-d7849b7bcf33
Holdway, Katie
(2020)
“The town, the town, good pit, has asses ears!”: Unstable audiences in Della Cruscan poetic conversation.
Romanticism, 26 (3), .
(doi:10.3366/rom.2020.0474).
Abstract
In his famously disparaging poetic retorts to the poetry of the British Della Cruscan movement, the Baviad and Mæviad, Tory satirist William Gifford made every effort to separate the readers of Della Cruscan poetry into two distinct audiences: Della Cruscan ‘writer-readers’ who read and actively responded to pieces written by other members of the coterie with poetry of their own, and the non-participating mass audience. According to Gifford, this latter audience—metonymized as ‘the Town’ in the Baviad—ignorantly follows the whims of fashion, absorbing Della Cruscan poetry, but never actually responding to it. Through an analysis of both Della Cruscan poetry and Gifford’s retorts, this paper aims to re-establish the links between these two kinds of audiences. I will argue that Gifford’s attempts to suppress these links stemmed from a deep-seated fear—fuelled by post-Revolutionary political instability—that the Della Cruscan coterie offered a platform whereby members of the mass reading audience could join their poetic conversations pseudonymously, and ultimately be granted a voice, regardless of their gender or political affiliations.
Text
Article_Published_Version
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 24 August 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 November 2020
Published date: 4 November 2020
Keywords:
Audience, Della Crusca, Gifford, Newspaper, Poetry
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 445649
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445649
ISSN: 1354-991X
PURE UUID: 26aaeb70-1f25-42ae-ae84-aa0037bab20b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jan 2021 17:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 09:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Katie Holdway
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics