Explaining the sexuality gap in attitudes & policy preferences: the case of health over wealth in response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Explaining the sexuality gap in attitudes & policy preferences: the case of health over wealth in response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Sexual minority citizens, on average, hold more liberal political attitudes than their heterosexual counterparts. However, the cause of this ‘sexuality gap’ remains contested. The broadly consensual nature of partisan responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK provides a unique case study to effectively control for the potential role of partisan cues and so shed light on the mechanisms that determine the sexuality gap. In this regard, we make three contributions in this letter. Firstly, using survey data on citizens’ attitudes towards prioritising health over the economy, we find that sexual minority voters disproportionately place greater emphasis on the former. This gap remains regardless of socio-demographics and party choice, suggesting a socialisation effect of sexuality. We use mediation analysis to demonstrate the sexuality gap can be explained primarily via divergent political outlooks and only to a lesser extent via differing levels of personal empathy, as has previously been theorised.
covid-19, coronavirus, LGBT+, empathy, political psychology, socialisation, attitude formation
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J.
e25c6280-842c-407f-a961-6472eea5d845
Dennison, James
364c8c82-6975-45bd-9d61-e5570255bea1
Townsley, Joshua
b67ce2e7-3fe6-4483-89da-4e0329f0183e
2020
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J.
e25c6280-842c-407f-a961-6472eea5d845
Dennison, James
364c8c82-6975-45bd-9d61-e5570255bea1
Townsley, Joshua
b67ce2e7-3fe6-4483-89da-4e0329f0183e
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J., Dennison, James and Townsley, Joshua
(2020)
Explaining the sexuality gap in attitudes & policy preferences: the case of health over wealth in response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
Sexual minority citizens, on average, hold more liberal political attitudes than their heterosexual counterparts. However, the cause of this ‘sexuality gap’ remains contested. The broadly consensual nature of partisan responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK provides a unique case study to effectively control for the potential role of partisan cues and so shed light on the mechanisms that determine the sexuality gap. In this regard, we make three contributions in this letter. Firstly, using survey data on citizens’ attitudes towards prioritising health over the economy, we find that sexual minority voters disproportionately place greater emphasis on the former. This gap remains regardless of socio-demographics and party choice, suggesting a socialisation effect of sexuality. We use mediation analysis to demonstrate the sexuality gap can be explained primarily via divergent political outlooks and only to a lesser extent via differing levels of personal empathy, as has previously been theorised.
Text
HealthWealth_Covid
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: 2020
Keywords:
covid-19, coronavirus, LGBT+, empathy, political psychology, socialisation, attitude formation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 445717
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445717
PURE UUID: 849a0c69-5334-4f0f-aa19-16ff75a24276
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jan 2021 17:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:01
Export record
Contributors
Author:
James Dennison
Author:
Joshua Townsley
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics