The impact of enhanced recovery on open and laparoscopic liver resections
The impact of enhanced recovery on open and laparoscopic liver resections
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs (ERP) have been implemented in many surgical specialties. Their impact in liver surgery is poorly understood and approach-specific ERPs have not yet been assessed. This retrospective study aims to analyse the effect of such programs on liver resection. All patients undergoing liver resection at a tertiary referral centre between January 2009 and April 2019 were identified. Primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS), secondary outcomes were functional recovery, complications and readmission rates. Patients in the ERP with different protocols for open, laparoscopic, major and minor resections were compared to a historical cohort. Of 1056 patients, 644 were treated within the ERP. A comparable duration of hospital stay [7 days (IQR (interquartile range) 6-12) vs 7 days (IQR 5-9) p = 0.047] and faster functional recovery with fewer complications was found in the ERP group [94 (50.5%) vs 103 (35.9%) p < 0.002]. Those advantages were smaller after open minor compared to open major resection. In patients undergoing laparoscopic resection no differences were observed except for a lower readmission rate [21 (9.3%) vs 13 (3.6%) p = 0.005]. Multivariable analysis showed that laparoscopy was associated with a shorter LOS. ERPs offer significant advantages in open liver surgery. Those advantages are less evident after laparoscopic resection.
Aged, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Female, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Length of Stay, Liver Neoplasms/surgery, Liver/surgery, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome
649-657
Giovinazzo, Francesco
8d54b964-27f5-49bb-aa6f-ec5f41981d30
Kuemmerli, Christoph
85b9f630-6845-4b8a-bbd7-76ace58cebfb
Moekotte, Alma
c872a6c9-c212-4ddf-9870-6fb191c8ec06
Rawashdeh, Arab
87661d48-873c-453e-b433-923650a74513
Suhool, Amal
1afc7073-af0a-4dc9-b9f2-5df0e512ffed
Armstrong, Thomas
3b87df01-cd08-4048-91c4-7390c73a5960
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
2b7464e5-6a59-4bd8-bfe4-27a1918a5c5a
September 2020
Giovinazzo, Francesco
8d54b964-27f5-49bb-aa6f-ec5f41981d30
Kuemmerli, Christoph
85b9f630-6845-4b8a-bbd7-76ace58cebfb
Moekotte, Alma
c872a6c9-c212-4ddf-9870-6fb191c8ec06
Rawashdeh, Arab
87661d48-873c-453e-b433-923650a74513
Suhool, Amal
1afc7073-af0a-4dc9-b9f2-5df0e512ffed
Armstrong, Thomas
3b87df01-cd08-4048-91c4-7390c73a5960
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
2b7464e5-6a59-4bd8-bfe4-27a1918a5c5a
Giovinazzo, Francesco, Kuemmerli, Christoph, Moekotte, Alma, Rawashdeh, Arab, Suhool, Amal, Armstrong, Thomas, Primrose, John and Abu Hilal, Mohammed
(2020)
The impact of enhanced recovery on open and laparoscopic liver resections.
Updates in Surgery, 72 (3), .
(doi:10.1007/s13304-020-00786-7).
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs (ERP) have been implemented in many surgical specialties. Their impact in liver surgery is poorly understood and approach-specific ERPs have not yet been assessed. This retrospective study aims to analyse the effect of such programs on liver resection. All patients undergoing liver resection at a tertiary referral centre between January 2009 and April 2019 were identified. Primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS), secondary outcomes were functional recovery, complications and readmission rates. Patients in the ERP with different protocols for open, laparoscopic, major and minor resections were compared to a historical cohort. Of 1056 patients, 644 were treated within the ERP. A comparable duration of hospital stay [7 days (IQR (interquartile range) 6-12) vs 7 days (IQR 5-9) p = 0.047] and faster functional recovery with fewer complications was found in the ERP group [94 (50.5%) vs 103 (35.9%) p < 0.002]. Those advantages were smaller after open minor compared to open major resection. In patients undergoing laparoscopic resection no differences were observed except for a lower readmission rate [21 (9.3%) vs 13 (3.6%) p = 0.005]. Multivariable analysis showed that laparoscopy was associated with a shorter LOS. ERPs offer significant advantages in open liver surgery. Those advantages are less evident after laparoscopic resection.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 May 2020
Published date: September 2020
Keywords:
Aged, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Female, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Length of Stay, Liver Neoplasms/surgery, Liver/surgery, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 446059
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446059
ISSN: 2038-131X
PURE UUID: aead0ce2-ff84-4d1a-ad1a-15a9b22c9729
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Jan 2021 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Francesco Giovinazzo
Author:
Christoph Kuemmerli
Author:
Alma Moekotte
Author:
Arab Rawashdeh
Author:
Amal Suhool
Author:
Thomas Armstrong
Author:
Mohammed Abu Hilal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics