Statistical disclosure control methods for census frequency tables
Statistical disclosure control methods for census frequency tables
This paper provides a review of common statistical disclosure control (SDC) methods implemented at Statistical Agencies for standard tabular outputs containing whole population counts from a Census (either enumerated or based on a register). These methods include record swapping on the microdata prior to its tabulation and rounding of entries in the tables after they are produced. The approach for assessing SDC methods is based on a disclosure risk–data utility framework and the need to find the balance between managing disclosure risk while maximizing the amount of information that can be released to users and ensuring high quality outputs. To carry out the analysis, quantitative measures of disclosure risk and data utility are defined and methods compared. Conclusions from the analysis show that record swapping as a sole SDC method leaves high probabilities of disclosure risk. Targeted record swapping lowers the disclosure risk, but there is more distortion to distributions. Small cell adjustments (rounding) give protection to Census tables by eliminating small cells but only one set of variables and geographies can be disseminated in order to avoid disclosure by differencing nested tables. Full random rounding offers more protection against disclosure by differencing, but margins are typically rounded separately from the internal cells and tables are not additive. Rounding procedures protect against the perception of disclosure risk compared to record swapping since no small cells appear in the tables. Combining rounding with record swapping raises the level of protection but increases the loss of utility to Census tabular outputs. For some statistical analysis, the combination of record swapping and rounding balances to some degree opposing effects that the methods have on the utility of the tables.
University of Southampton
Shlomo, Natalie
e749febc-b7b9-4017-be48-96d59dd03215
28 February 2007
Shlomo, Natalie
e749febc-b7b9-4017-be48-96d59dd03215
Shlomo, Natalie
(2007)
Statistical disclosure control methods for census frequency tables
(S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M07/04)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
40pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
This paper provides a review of common statistical disclosure control (SDC) methods implemented at Statistical Agencies for standard tabular outputs containing whole population counts from a Census (either enumerated or based on a register). These methods include record swapping on the microdata prior to its tabulation and rounding of entries in the tables after they are produced. The approach for assessing SDC methods is based on a disclosure risk–data utility framework and the need to find the balance between managing disclosure risk while maximizing the amount of information that can be released to users and ensuring high quality outputs. To carry out the analysis, quantitative measures of disclosure risk and data utility are defined and methods compared. Conclusions from the analysis show that record swapping as a sole SDC method leaves high probabilities of disclosure risk. Targeted record swapping lowers the disclosure risk, but there is more distortion to distributions. Small cell adjustments (rounding) give protection to Census tables by eliminating small cells but only one set of variables and geographies can be disseminated in order to avoid disclosure by differencing nested tables. Full random rounding offers more protection against disclosure by differencing, but margins are typically rounded separately from the internal cells and tables are not additive. Rounding procedures protect against the perception of disclosure risk compared to record swapping since no small cells appear in the tables. Combining rounding with record swapping raises the level of protection but increases the loss of utility to Census tabular outputs. For some statistical analysis, the combination of record swapping and rounding balances to some degree opposing effects that the methods have on the utility of the tables.
Text
44610-01.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 28 February 2007
Additional Information:
This paper supersedes working paper M06/03.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 44610
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/44610
PURE UUID: 9c34d829-5481-4c56-baa5-e824e30476df
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Feb 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 16:23
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Natalie Shlomo
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics