The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Agent-based modelling of juvenile eel migration via selective tidal stream transport

Agent-based modelling of juvenile eel migration via selective tidal stream transport
Agent-based modelling of juvenile eel migration via selective tidal stream transport
Recruitment of temperate eel species Anguilla anguilla, A. rostrata & A. japonica has declined over the last few decades due to human activities, such as overfishing and construction of migratory barriers (e.g. dams, weirs and sluices) and hazardous energy infrastructure (e.g. turbines, intakes and outfalls). Numerical models, substantiated with data from field and laboratory studies, can potentially predict and quantify the relative impacts of such activities, thereby assisting in the sustainable management of eel populations. Here, we present an agent-based model (ABM) of juvenile eel migration up estuaries. The model includes relevant eel behaviours and environmental conditions that, according to the literature, influence upstream migration. Crucially, by assessing the local salinity gradient and relative flow direction, the modelled eels (agents) self-determine whether the tide is flooding or ebbing and orientate themselves for navigation, with no top-down instructions. This allows the agents to decide which particular behaviour to undertake as part of Selective Tidal Stream Transport (STST). The developed ABM is coupled to a hydrodynamic model of the Thames Estuary and the results substantiated by comparison against eel trap data. Combinations of the various STST behaviours are systematically tested and the influence they have on up-estuary migration is assessed in terms of relative energy expenditure. The parameterised model is then used predictively at Milford Haven Waterway to investigate potential impacts on the juvenile eel population due to entrainment in a power plant cooling water intake and outfall. Results from the Thames model case study indicate that including bed anchoring behaviour is essential for achieving a good comparison with the eel trap data and the choice of salinity detection threshold is also important. If daylight avoidance (diel) behaviour is not included, the most energy efficient migration is achieved using just two STST behaviours (ebb tide bed anchoring and upward migration during flood). With diel behaviour included, energy expenditure is greater, but some efficiency is regained by including all of the STST behaviours. For the Milford Haven case study, the model predicted a juvenile eel intake and outfall entrainment rate of 2.0% and 4.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the ABM is a valuable tool for assessing potential impacts on the recruitment of eels (extendable to other species) and could be used to assist in site-selection and low impact design of energy infrastructure in tidal environments.
ABM, Agent-based model, Elver, Glass eel, IBM, Migration, Selective tidal stream transport
0304-3800
1-18
Benson, Thomas
8422952f-4d7a-425b-83ef-a1532533ce10
De Bie, Jasper
064ae5a8-77bf-4197-9496-9540e26a585a
Gaskell, Jennifer
8fb6e95b-158a-47c9-b367-f126e0c70fa7
Vezza, Paolo
feba4aab-3d89-4d3e-826d-ca439261a285
Kerr, James
cfdf2892-19c2-4206-9416-848b2b0f672c
Lumbroso, Darren
26c7f97c-8f60-4c32-b4eb-e91b9d65f59f
Owen, Markus R.
3ef2b922-56a5-4758-a95d-135cbc1ccead
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
Benson, Thomas
8422952f-4d7a-425b-83ef-a1532533ce10
De Bie, Jasper
064ae5a8-77bf-4197-9496-9540e26a585a
Gaskell, Jennifer
8fb6e95b-158a-47c9-b367-f126e0c70fa7
Vezza, Paolo
feba4aab-3d89-4d3e-826d-ca439261a285
Kerr, James
cfdf2892-19c2-4206-9416-848b2b0f672c
Lumbroso, Darren
26c7f97c-8f60-4c32-b4eb-e91b9d65f59f
Owen, Markus R.
3ef2b922-56a5-4758-a95d-135cbc1ccead
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7

Benson, Thomas, De Bie, Jasper, Gaskell, Jennifer, Vezza, Paolo, Kerr, James, Lumbroso, Darren, Owen, Markus R. and Kemp, Paul (2021) Agent-based modelling of juvenile eel migration via selective tidal stream transport. Ecological Modelling, 443, 1-18, [109448]. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109448).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Recruitment of temperate eel species Anguilla anguilla, A. rostrata & A. japonica has declined over the last few decades due to human activities, such as overfishing and construction of migratory barriers (e.g. dams, weirs and sluices) and hazardous energy infrastructure (e.g. turbines, intakes and outfalls). Numerical models, substantiated with data from field and laboratory studies, can potentially predict and quantify the relative impacts of such activities, thereby assisting in the sustainable management of eel populations. Here, we present an agent-based model (ABM) of juvenile eel migration up estuaries. The model includes relevant eel behaviours and environmental conditions that, according to the literature, influence upstream migration. Crucially, by assessing the local salinity gradient and relative flow direction, the modelled eels (agents) self-determine whether the tide is flooding or ebbing and orientate themselves for navigation, with no top-down instructions. This allows the agents to decide which particular behaviour to undertake as part of Selective Tidal Stream Transport (STST). The developed ABM is coupled to a hydrodynamic model of the Thames Estuary and the results substantiated by comparison against eel trap data. Combinations of the various STST behaviours are systematically tested and the influence they have on up-estuary migration is assessed in terms of relative energy expenditure. The parameterised model is then used predictively at Milford Haven Waterway to investigate potential impacts on the juvenile eel population due to entrainment in a power plant cooling water intake and outfall. Results from the Thames model case study indicate that including bed anchoring behaviour is essential for achieving a good comparison with the eel trap data and the choice of salinity detection threshold is also important. If daylight avoidance (diel) behaviour is not included, the most energy efficient migration is achieved using just two STST behaviours (ebb tide bed anchoring and upward migration during flood). With diel behaviour included, energy expenditure is greater, but some efficiency is regained by including all of the STST behaviours. For the Milford Haven case study, the model predicted a juvenile eel intake and outfall entrainment rate of 2.0% and 4.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the ABM is a valuable tool for assessing potential impacts on the recruitment of eels (extendable to other species) and could be used to assist in site-selection and low impact design of energy infrastructure in tidal environments.

Text
Benson et al. 2021 - Version of Record
Download (4MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 January 2021
Published date: 1 March 2021
Keywords: ABM, Agent-based model, Elver, Glass eel, IBM, Migration, Selective tidal stream transport

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 446173
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446173
ISSN: 0304-3800
PURE UUID: 0b599f3d-1e46-4008-8f38-6e8596a9760d
ORCID for James Kerr: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-7293
ORCID for Paul Kemp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0589

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jan 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Benson
Author: Jasper De Bie
Author: Jennifer Gaskell
Author: Paolo Vezza
Author: James Kerr ORCID iD
Author: Darren Lumbroso
Author: Markus R. Owen
Author: Paul Kemp ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×