The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Intratumoural immune signature to identify patients with primary colorectal cancer who do not require follow-up after resection: an observational study

Intratumoural immune signature to identify patients with primary colorectal cancer who do not require follow-up after resection: an observational study
Intratumoural immune signature to identify patients with primary colorectal cancer who do not require follow-up after resection: an observational study

Background: Following surgical and adjuvant treatment of primary colorectal cancer, many patients are routinely followed up with axial imaging (most commonly computerised tomography imaging) and blood carcinoembryonic antigen (a tumour marker) testing. Because fewer than one-fifth of patients will relapse, a large number of patients are followed up unnecessarily. Objectives: To determine whether or not the intratumoural immune signature could identify a cohort of patients with a relapse rate so low that follow-up is unnecessary. Design: An observational study based on a secondary tissue collection of the tumours from participants in the FACS (Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Surgery) trial. Setting and participants: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue was obtained from 550 out of 1202 participants in the FACS trial. Tissue microarrays were constructed and stained for cluster of differentiation (CD)3+ and CD45RO+ T lymphocytes as well as standard haematoxylin and eosin staining, with a view to manual and, subsequently, automated cell counting. Results: The tissue microarrays were satisfactorily stained for the two immune markers. Manual cell counting proved possible on the arrays, but manually counting the number of cores for the entire study was found to not be feasible; therefore, an attempt was made to use automatic cell counting. Although it is clear that this approach is workable, there were both hardware and software problems; therefore, reliable data could not be obtained within the time frame of the study. Limitations: The main limitations were the inability to use machine counting because of problems with both hardware and software, and the loss of critical scientific staff. Findings from this research indicate that this approach will be able to count intratumoural immune cells in the long term, but whether or not the original aim of the project proved possible is not known. Conclusions: The project was not successful in its aim because of the failure to achieve a reliable counting system.

BIOMARKERS, HUMAN, CELL COUNT, COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, COLORECTAL SURGERY, RECURRENCE, STAINING AND LABELLING, T LYMPHOCYTES, TISSUE MICROARRAY, TUMOUR INFILTRATING T LYMPHOCYTES
1366-5278
1-31
Primrose, John N
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Pugh, Siân A
83010563-0865-446c-ba71-95e2a45d9562
Thomas, Gareth
2ff54aa9-a766-416b-91ee-cf1c5be74106
Ellis, Matthew
afbca752-ced4-40dd-b0af-d9ecffbd5b63
Moutasim, Karwan
af7dd711-f6df-44f7-8c57-052bf15303af
Mant, David
b663daa9-785a-4b0b-ad20-7583d0fe75b7
Primrose, John N
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Pugh, Siân A
83010563-0865-446c-ba71-95e2a45d9562
Thomas, Gareth
2ff54aa9-a766-416b-91ee-cf1c5be74106
Ellis, Matthew
afbca752-ced4-40dd-b0af-d9ecffbd5b63
Moutasim, Karwan
af7dd711-f6df-44f7-8c57-052bf15303af
Mant, David
b663daa9-785a-4b0b-ad20-7583d0fe75b7

Primrose, John N, Pugh, Siân A, Thomas, Gareth, Ellis, Matthew, Moutasim, Karwan and Mant, David (2021) Intratumoural immune signature to identify patients with primary colorectal cancer who do not require follow-up after resection: an observational study. Health Technology Assessment, 25 (2), 1-31. (doi:10.3310/hta25020).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Following surgical and adjuvant treatment of primary colorectal cancer, many patients are routinely followed up with axial imaging (most commonly computerised tomography imaging) and blood carcinoembryonic antigen (a tumour marker) testing. Because fewer than one-fifth of patients will relapse, a large number of patients are followed up unnecessarily. Objectives: To determine whether or not the intratumoural immune signature could identify a cohort of patients with a relapse rate so low that follow-up is unnecessary. Design: An observational study based on a secondary tissue collection of the tumours from participants in the FACS (Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Surgery) trial. Setting and participants: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue was obtained from 550 out of 1202 participants in the FACS trial. Tissue microarrays were constructed and stained for cluster of differentiation (CD)3+ and CD45RO+ T lymphocytes as well as standard haematoxylin and eosin staining, with a view to manual and, subsequently, automated cell counting. Results: The tissue microarrays were satisfactorily stained for the two immune markers. Manual cell counting proved possible on the arrays, but manually counting the number of cores for the entire study was found to not be feasible; therefore, an attempt was made to use automatic cell counting. Although it is clear that this approach is workable, there were both hardware and software problems; therefore, reliable data could not be obtained within the time frame of the study. Limitations: The main limitations were the inability to use machine counting because of problems with both hardware and software, and the loss of critical scientific staff. Findings from this research indicate that this approach will be able to count intratumoural immune cells in the long term, but whether or not the original aim of the project proved possible is not known. Conclusions: The project was not successful in its aim because of the failure to achieve a reliable counting system.

Text
3035395 - Version of Record
Download (16MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 June 2020
Published date: 1 January 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding Information: The initial intention was to manually count cells using a standard microscope. Although this proved possible, rapidly became clear that the time required for the project was not feasible. Our calculation was that counting 17 TMAs for two antibodies only would take around 480 hours or 80 6-hour days. Consideration was given to using a ‘citizen science’-type programme,19 but there were no resources to organise such a complex system. In 2015, it became clear that automated analysis was coming to the fore, and in 2016 a Digital Pathology Accelerator award to Belfast and Southampton enabled appropriate hardware and software to be installed. Attempts were made to scan the TMAs on a Zeiss Axio Scan.Z120 (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) whole-slide scanner at resolution equivalent to ×20 magnification. Initial image analysis was carried out using QuPath (developed at the University of Edinburgh; originally created at the Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology at Queen’s University Belfast as part of research projects funded by Invest Northern Ireland and Cancer Research UK).21 Unfortunately, neither the hardware nor the software functioned correctly. Funding Information: The original FACS proposal did not include funding to obtain tissue from the primary tumours of the patients in the study but the ethics permissions and patient consent allowed for this. The present grant funding enabled the collection of tissue blocks from the centres. This work was undertaken by the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit and tissue stored in the Human Tissue Authority-registered Southampton Tissue Bank until used. Funding Information: part of research projects funded by Invest Northern Ireland and Cancer Research UK). Various technical issues were encountered, including misregistration of the tissue microarray cores by the software (requiring manual relocation, which was a prolonged exercise). Some preliminary data were obtained on 287 patients prior to the scientist running the scanner relocating. These results represent only part of the cohort and, as such, are unsuitable for publication. However, they give an indication that a signal is present which warrants pursuing the project further. Funding Information: The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 11/136/83. The contractual start date was in January 2013. The draft report began editorial review in July 2019 and was accepted for publication in June 2020. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report. Publisher Copyright: © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2021.
Keywords: BIOMARKERS, HUMAN, CELL COUNT, COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, COLORECTAL SURGERY, RECURRENCE, STAINING AND LABELLING, T LYMPHOCYTES, TISSUE MICROARRAY, TUMOUR INFILTRATING T LYMPHOCYTES

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 446476
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446476
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: 5abc0c04-8853-48ff-a3c3-90cf94ae59fe
ORCID for John N Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Feb 2021 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: John N Primrose ORCID iD
Author: Siân A Pugh
Author: Gareth Thomas
Author: Matthew Ellis
Author: Karwan Moutasim
Author: David Mant

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×