The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Vaccination strategies for measles control and elimination: time to strengthen local initiatives

Vaccination strategies for measles control and elimination: time to strengthen local initiatives
Vaccination strategies for measles control and elimination: time to strengthen local initiatives
Background
Through a combination of strong routine immunization (RI), strategic supplemental immunization activities (SIA) and robust surveillance, numerous countries have been able to approach or achieve measles elimination. The fragility of these achievements has been shown, however, by the resurgence of measles since 2016. We describe trends in routine measles vaccine coverage at national and district level, SIA performance and demographic changes in the three regions with the highest measles burden.

Findings
WHO-UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage show that global coverage of the first dose of measles vaccine has stabilized at 85% from 2015 to 19. In 2000, 17 countries in the WHO African and Eastern Mediterranean regions had measles vaccine coverage below 50%, and although all increased coverage by 2019, at a median of 60%, it remained far below levels needed for elimination. Geospatial estimates show many low coverage districts across Africa and much of the Eastern Mediterranean and southeast Asian regions. A large proportion of children unvaccinated for MCV live in conflict-affected areas with remote rural areas and some urban areas also at risk. Countries with low RI coverage use SIAs frequently, yet the ideal timing and target age range for SIAs vary within countries, and the impact of SIAs has often been mitigated by delays or disruptions. SIAs have not been sufficient to achieve or sustain measles elimination in the countries with weakest routine systems. Demographic changes also affect measles transmission, and their variation between and within countries should be incorporated into strategic planning.

Conclusions
Rebuilding services after the COVID-19 pandemic provides a need and an opportunity to increase community engagement in planning and monitoring services. A broader suite of interventions is needed beyond SIAs. Improved methods for tracking coverage at the individual and community level are needed together with enhanced surveillance. Decision-making needs to be decentralized to develop locally-driven, sustainable strategies for measles control and elimination.
Campaigns, Elimination, Measles, Routine immunization
1741-7015
1-8
Cutts, Felicity T.
25ed9d13-371b-4f1a-a15d-ca20f7e0d502
Ferrari, M.J.
dae39688-4fe9-4223-9d55-0dd8edf5b6f0
Krause, L.K.
4b3f26a8-7649-4c0c-bdc7-c29f5558f1bb
Tatem, Andrew
6c6de104-a5f9-46e0-bb93-a1a7c980513e
Mosser, J.F.
cf5103b5-06cb-4e4b-bb07-11b09ea72998
Cutts, Felicity T.
25ed9d13-371b-4f1a-a15d-ca20f7e0d502
Ferrari, M.J.
dae39688-4fe9-4223-9d55-0dd8edf5b6f0
Krause, L.K.
4b3f26a8-7649-4c0c-bdc7-c29f5558f1bb
Tatem, Andrew
6c6de104-a5f9-46e0-bb93-a1a7c980513e
Mosser, J.F.
cf5103b5-06cb-4e4b-bb07-11b09ea72998

Cutts, Felicity T., Ferrari, M.J., Krause, L.K., Tatem, Andrew and Mosser, J.F. (2021) Vaccination strategies for measles control and elimination: time to strengthen local initiatives. BMC Medicine, 19 (1), 1-8, [2]. (doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01843-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Through a combination of strong routine immunization (RI), strategic supplemental immunization activities (SIA) and robust surveillance, numerous countries have been able to approach or achieve measles elimination. The fragility of these achievements has been shown, however, by the resurgence of measles since 2016. We describe trends in routine measles vaccine coverage at national and district level, SIA performance and demographic changes in the three regions with the highest measles burden.

Findings
WHO-UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage show that global coverage of the first dose of measles vaccine has stabilized at 85% from 2015 to 19. In 2000, 17 countries in the WHO African and Eastern Mediterranean regions had measles vaccine coverage below 50%, and although all increased coverage by 2019, at a median of 60%, it remained far below levels needed for elimination. Geospatial estimates show many low coverage districts across Africa and much of the Eastern Mediterranean and southeast Asian regions. A large proportion of children unvaccinated for MCV live in conflict-affected areas with remote rural areas and some urban areas also at risk. Countries with low RI coverage use SIAs frequently, yet the ideal timing and target age range for SIAs vary within countries, and the impact of SIAs has often been mitigated by delays or disruptions. SIAs have not been sufficient to achieve or sustain measles elimination in the countries with weakest routine systems. Demographic changes also affect measles transmission, and their variation between and within countries should be incorporated into strategic planning.

Conclusions
Rebuilding services after the COVID-19 pandemic provides a need and an opportunity to increase community engagement in planning and monitoring services. A broader suite of interventions is needed beyond SIAs. Improved methods for tracking coverage at the individual and community level are needed together with enhanced surveillance. Decision-making needs to be decentralized to develop locally-driven, sustainable strategies for measles control and elimination.

Text
Vaccination_strategies_for_measles_control_and_elimination_time_to_strengthen_local_initiatives - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (6MB)
Text
Vaccination strategies for measles control and elimination - time to strengthen local initiatives
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 November 2020
Published date: 5 January 2021
Keywords: Campaigns, Elimination, Measles, Routine immunization

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 446505
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446505
ISSN: 1741-7015
PURE UUID: 6613d923-377d-4de2-944b-474866974386
ORCID for Andrew Tatem: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-941X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Feb 2021 17:39
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Felicity T. Cutts
Author: M.J. Ferrari
Author: L.K. Krause
Author: Andrew Tatem ORCID iD
Author: J.F. Mosser

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×