The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Technology Business Incubators in China and India: a comparative analysis

Technology Business Incubators in China and India: a comparative analysis
Technology Business Incubators in China and India: a comparative analysis
Technology Business Incubators (TBIs) in China and India are compared by employing an analytical framework that combines the national system of innovation concept and a modified TBI integrative framework. Two research questions are investigated: What are the management polices practices of, and incubation services offered by the TBIs in China and India?, and How successful are the TBI?s in China and India? Findings reveal that there are a number of similarities (including objectives, selection criteria for tenants, funding of new ventures, and basic services provided) and differences (including ownership/ legal status, structure and governance, funding, value added and specialists services, incubation period, number of TBIs, tenants, employees, and revenues) between China and India. Both systems evolved due to specific national context, which led to most of these differences.
33-58
Tang, Mingfeng
b8162f60-2882-4266-991a-33519f473e19
Baskaran, Angathevar
2fbc6272-3299-4f72-ba2e-228e86b44ff7
Pancholi, Jatin
42fb2152-3fb4-4597-9e0a-e7b259aa5954
Lu, Yong
e33687b0-c0b5-4820-998a-dd0b1540c4eb
Tang, Mingfeng
b8162f60-2882-4266-991a-33519f473e19
Baskaran, Angathevar
2fbc6272-3299-4f72-ba2e-228e86b44ff7
Pancholi, Jatin
42fb2152-3fb4-4597-9e0a-e7b259aa5954
Lu, Yong
e33687b0-c0b5-4820-998a-dd0b1540c4eb

Tang, Mingfeng, Baskaran, Angathevar, Pancholi, Jatin and Lu, Yong (2013) Technology Business Incubators in China and India: a comparative analysis. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 16 (2), 33-58.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Technology Business Incubators (TBIs) in China and India are compared by employing an analytical framework that combines the national system of innovation concept and a modified TBI integrative framework. Two research questions are investigated: What are the management polices practices of, and incubation services offered by the TBIs in China and India?, and How successful are the TBI?s in China and India? Findings reveal that there are a number of similarities (including objectives, selection criteria for tenants, funding of new ventures, and basic services provided) and differences (including ownership/ legal status, structure and governance, funding, value added and specialists services, incubation period, number of TBIs, tenants, employees, and revenues) between China and India. Both systems evolved due to specific national context, which led to most of these differences.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 April 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 446709
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/446709
PURE UUID: 689c4131-d257-48d5-b741-c2a049409aab
ORCID for Jatin Pancholi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-2849

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Feb 2021 17:31
Last modified: 28 Apr 2022 02:30

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mingfeng Tang
Author: Angathevar Baskaran
Author: Jatin Pancholi ORCID iD
Author: Yong Lu

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×