The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Computational methods for direct cell conversion

Computational methods for direct cell conversion
Computational methods for direct cell conversion
Directed cell conversion (or transdifferentiation) of one somatic cell-type to another can be achieved by ectopic expression of a set of transcription factors. Since the experimental identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation is extremely time-consuming and expensive, there are still relatively few transdifferentiations achieved in comparison to the number of human cell-types. However, the growing volume of transcriptional data available and the recent introduction of data-driven algorithmic approaches that predict factors for transdifferentiation holds great promise for accelerating this field. Here we review those computational methods whose in-silico predictions have been experimentally validated, highlighting differences and similarities. Our analysis reveals that the factors predicted by each method tend to be different due to varying source cells used, gene expression quantification and algorithmic steps. We show these differences have an impact on the regulatory influences downstream, with some methods favoring transcription factors regulating developmental progression and others favoring factors regulating mature cell processes. These computational approaches offer a starting point to predict and test novel factors for transdifferentiation. We argue that collecting high-quality gene expression data from single-cells or pure cell-populations across a broader set of cell-types would be necessary to improve the quality and consistency of the in-silico predictions.
Animals, Cell Transdifferentiation, Cells/metabolism, Cellular Reprogramming, Computational Biology/methods, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Transcription Factors/metabolism
1538-4101
3343-3354
Kamaraj, Uma S.
3c28fbb3-f5fe-4243-a953-1bcfbb1daf6e
Gough, Julian
019ed039-9fd4-45d6-aa7a-12a8fcf7245c
Polo, Jose M.
f55d7039-bd9e-4e56-98e3-fdf3d118d4f3
Petretto, Enrico
a8a7d254-ea06-4ab3-ba7e-b653349a29f4
Rackham, Owen J.L.
8122eb1f-6e9f-4da5-90e1-ce108ccbbcbf
Kamaraj, Uma S.
3c28fbb3-f5fe-4243-a953-1bcfbb1daf6e
Gough, Julian
019ed039-9fd4-45d6-aa7a-12a8fcf7245c
Polo, Jose M.
f55d7039-bd9e-4e56-98e3-fdf3d118d4f3
Petretto, Enrico
a8a7d254-ea06-4ab3-ba7e-b653349a29f4
Rackham, Owen J.L.
8122eb1f-6e9f-4da5-90e1-ce108ccbbcbf

Kamaraj, Uma S., Gough, Julian, Polo, Jose M., Petretto, Enrico and Rackham, Owen J.L. (2016) Computational methods for direct cell conversion. Cell Cycle, 15 (24), 3343-3354. (doi:10.1080/15384101.2016.1238119).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Directed cell conversion (or transdifferentiation) of one somatic cell-type to another can be achieved by ectopic expression of a set of transcription factors. Since the experimental identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation is extremely time-consuming and expensive, there are still relatively few transdifferentiations achieved in comparison to the number of human cell-types. However, the growing volume of transcriptional data available and the recent introduction of data-driven algorithmic approaches that predict factors for transdifferentiation holds great promise for accelerating this field. Here we review those computational methods whose in-silico predictions have been experimentally validated, highlighting differences and similarities. Our analysis reveals that the factors predicted by each method tend to be different due to varying source cells used, gene expression quantification and algorithmic steps. We show these differences have an impact on the regulatory influences downstream, with some methods favoring transcription factors regulating developmental progression and others favoring factors regulating mature cell processes. These computational approaches offer a starting point to predict and test novel factors for transdifferentiation. We argue that collecting high-quality gene expression data from single-cells or pure cell-populations across a broader set of cell-types would be necessary to improve the quality and consistency of the in-silico predictions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 13 October 2016
Published date: 16 December 2016
Keywords: Animals, Cell Transdifferentiation, Cells/metabolism, Cellular Reprogramming, Computational Biology/methods, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Transcription Factors/metabolism

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447035
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447035
ISSN: 1538-4101
PURE UUID: 7ddd6027-0030-4514-bffd-6ca9ab8e2581
ORCID for Owen J.L. Rackham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-0872

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Mar 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Uma S. Kamaraj
Author: Julian Gough
Author: Jose M. Polo
Author: Enrico Petretto

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×