“It is quite conceivable that judgment is a very complicated phenomenon”: Dorothy Wrinch, nonsense and the multiple relation theory of judgement
“It is quite conceivable that judgment is a very complicated phenomenon”: Dorothy Wrinch, nonsense and the multiple relation theory of judgement
In her paper “On the Nature of Judgment”, published in 1919 in Mind, Dorothy Wrinch aimed at understanding how Russell’s multiple relation theory of judgement might be made to work. In this paper we will focus on Wrinch’s claim that on the theory it is impossible, as it should be, to judge nonsense. After having presented the prima facie objection to the theory created by nonsense and what we can take her solution to such a problem to imply (§1), we will show how Wrinch can resist the two main objections that have been moved to such a solution, whether as explicitly attributed to Wrinch or discussed without mentioning her. The conclusion will be, contrary to what one might be tempted to think, that even if there might be reasons to take the multiple relation theory as doomed, Wrinch was the first to show us that nonsense is not one of those reasons.
Russell, Wrinch, nonsense, the multiple relation theory of judgement, type restrictions
250-266
Felappi, Giulia
9c0bc4c5-5547-434e-8bbd-0c785bece1bc
11 March 2021
Felappi, Giulia
9c0bc4c5-5547-434e-8bbd-0c785bece1bc
Felappi, Giulia
(2021)
“It is quite conceivable that judgment is a very complicated phenomenon”: Dorothy Wrinch, nonsense and the multiple relation theory of judgement.
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 30 (2), .
(doi:10.1080/09608788.2021.1888694).
Abstract
In her paper “On the Nature of Judgment”, published in 1919 in Mind, Dorothy Wrinch aimed at understanding how Russell’s multiple relation theory of judgement might be made to work. In this paper we will focus on Wrinch’s claim that on the theory it is impossible, as it should be, to judge nonsense. After having presented the prima facie objection to the theory created by nonsense and what we can take her solution to such a problem to imply (§1), we will show how Wrinch can resist the two main objections that have been moved to such a solution, whether as explicitly attributed to Wrinch or discussed without mentioning her. The conclusion will be, contrary to what one might be tempted to think, that even if there might be reasons to take the multiple relation theory as doomed, Wrinch was the first to show us that nonsense is not one of those reasons.
Text
Wrinch nonsense and the multiple relation theory of judgment
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 March 2021
Published date: 11 March 2021
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BSHP.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Russell, Wrinch, nonsense, the multiple relation theory of judgement, type restrictions
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 447042
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447042
ISSN: 0960-8788
PURE UUID: 3fbeb551-99cf-4d83-8bbc-e3edc7744a50
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Mar 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics