The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The relevance and challenges of using journal guides to evaluate the quality of journals and papers

The relevance and challenges of using journal guides to evaluate the quality of journals and papers
The relevance and challenges of using journal guides to evaluate the quality of journals and papers
Wouldn’t it be great to have a clear single decisive list to determine and define what quality should be assigned or attributed to each specific academic journal? Simply, the answer is – certainly not. To start with, it is not possible. Defining quality is an elusive and impossible task, as beautifully portrayed in “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance” (Pirsig, 1999). Measuring quality is no less challenging, yet, we know quality when we experience it - and different journals represent various levels of quality. Much of it is due to the rigor they require from submissions and the rigor of the review and decision making processes. Past success and reputation tend to establish norms, reinforcing the quality of the papers published.
Chartered Association of Business Schools
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a

Baruch, Yehuda (2021) The relevance and challenges of using journal guides to evaluate the quality of journals and papers.

Record type: Other

Abstract

Wouldn’t it be great to have a clear single decisive list to determine and define what quality should be assigned or attributed to each specific academic journal? Simply, the answer is – certainly not. To start with, it is not possible. Defining quality is an elusive and impossible task, as beautifully portrayed in “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance” (Pirsig, 1999). Measuring quality is no less challenging, yet, we know quality when we experience it - and different journals represent various levels of quality. Much of it is due to the rigor they require from submissions and the rigor of the review and decision making processes. Past success and reputation tend to establish norms, reinforcing the quality of the papers published.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 February 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447046
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447046
PURE UUID: 3d824d78-bf65-4ee7-90a4-14ba316ca554
ORCID for Yehuda Baruch: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-6273

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Mar 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:32

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×