The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneoulsy with 3-T fMRI: removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact

Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneoulsy with 3-T fMRI: removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact
Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneoulsy with 3-T fMRI: removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact
EEG signals recorded simultaneously with fMRI are massively compromised by severe artefacts, among them the cardiac cycle-related ballistocardiogram (BCG) artefact. Different methods have been proposed to remove the BCG artefact focusing on channel-wise template subtraction procedures or spatial filtering approaches such as independent component analysis (ICA). Here we systematically compared the performance of the optimal basis set (OBS), a channel-wise correction approach, with ICA and a recently proposed combination of both (OBS–ICA). The three different procedures were applied to 60-channel EEG data from 12 subjects recorded during fMRI acquisition in a 3-T scanner. In addition to examination of the residual BCG artefact, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the topography of the resulting auditory evoked potential component N1 were compared. Whereas all three approaches led to a significant artefact reduction, the ICA procedure resulted in a significantly reduced N1 SNR and amplitude when compared to BCG-uncorrected data, indicating a rather poor performance. In contrast to ICA, OBS and OBS–ICA corrected data substantially improved the SNR of the N1. The quality of the auditory evoked potential N1 topography was investigated by means of equivalent current dipole modelling. On a descriptive level, all three correction procedures led to a reduced localization error when compared to BCG-uncorrected data. This improvement was significant for OBS–ICA. We conclude that OBS and OBS–ICA can efficiently remove BCG artefacts and substantially improve the quality of EEG signals recorded inside the scanner, a prerequisite for the successful integration of simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI.
simultaneous EEG/fMRI, independent component analysis, ballistocardiogram artefact, dipole modelling, auditory evoked potential N1
587-597
Debener, Stefan
e6bf9143-09a8-45c0-8536-3564885375d4
Strobel, Alexander
272b7bac-eae5-4649-9a2d-51416f75275a
Sorger, Bettina
108f1ec6-5683-4e8a-876e-2544a670ef50
Peters, Judith
251c407e-4d06-4fd1-8c30-37082d93e82f
Kranczioch, Cornelia
c5d9d3fb-2b54-4ae0-85dd-fb1ae11aea4f
Engel, Andreas K.
4c9e2742-c147-46d6-b750-bcab4b5baf34
Goebel, Rainer
3d3b188d-fb96-42a7-925c-6dda7504fb04
Debener, Stefan
e6bf9143-09a8-45c0-8536-3564885375d4
Strobel, Alexander
272b7bac-eae5-4649-9a2d-51416f75275a
Sorger, Bettina
108f1ec6-5683-4e8a-876e-2544a670ef50
Peters, Judith
251c407e-4d06-4fd1-8c30-37082d93e82f
Kranczioch, Cornelia
c5d9d3fb-2b54-4ae0-85dd-fb1ae11aea4f
Engel, Andreas K.
4c9e2742-c147-46d6-b750-bcab4b5baf34
Goebel, Rainer
3d3b188d-fb96-42a7-925c-6dda7504fb04

Debener, Stefan, Strobel, Alexander, Sorger, Bettina, Peters, Judith, Kranczioch, Cornelia, Engel, Andreas K. and Goebel, Rainer (2007) Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneoulsy with 3-T fMRI: removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact. NeuroImage, 34 (2), 587-597. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.031).

Record type: Article

Abstract

EEG signals recorded simultaneously with fMRI are massively compromised by severe artefacts, among them the cardiac cycle-related ballistocardiogram (BCG) artefact. Different methods have been proposed to remove the BCG artefact focusing on channel-wise template subtraction procedures or spatial filtering approaches such as independent component analysis (ICA). Here we systematically compared the performance of the optimal basis set (OBS), a channel-wise correction approach, with ICA and a recently proposed combination of both (OBS–ICA). The three different procedures were applied to 60-channel EEG data from 12 subjects recorded during fMRI acquisition in a 3-T scanner. In addition to examination of the residual BCG artefact, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the topography of the resulting auditory evoked potential component N1 were compared. Whereas all three approaches led to a significant artefact reduction, the ICA procedure resulted in a significantly reduced N1 SNR and amplitude when compared to BCG-uncorrected data, indicating a rather poor performance. In contrast to ICA, OBS and OBS–ICA corrected data substantially improved the SNR of the N1. The quality of the auditory evoked potential N1 topography was investigated by means of equivalent current dipole modelling. On a descriptive level, all three correction procedures led to a reduced localization error when compared to BCG-uncorrected data. This improvement was significant for OBS–ICA. We conclude that OBS and OBS–ICA can efficiently remove BCG artefacts and substantially improve the quality of EEG signals recorded inside the scanner, a prerequisite for the successful integration of simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007
Keywords: simultaneous EEG/fMRI, independent component analysis, ballistocardiogram artefact, dipole modelling, auditory evoked potential N1

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 44716
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/44716
PURE UUID: c2cd3a7d-499f-432d-8759-dea6e8b63169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Mar 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Stefan Debener
Author: Alexander Strobel
Author: Bettina Sorger
Author: Judith Peters
Author: Cornelia Kranczioch
Author: Andreas K. Engel
Author: Rainer Goebel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×