The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Tweets and quacks: network and content analyses of providers of non-science-based anti-cancer treatments and their supporters on Twitter

Tweets and quacks: network and content analyses of providers of non-science-based anti-cancer treatments and their supporters on Twitter
Tweets and quacks: network and content analyses of providers of non-science-based anti-cancer treatments and their supporters on Twitter
Despite the consensus in the medical discipline that certain treatments lack scientific evidence and are worthless if not potentially dangerous, the promotion and selling of fake cures advertised as safe and effective has long plagued healthcare systems, praying on vulnerable patients and their loved ones. The Web and social media are now playing a fundamental role in the propagation of non-science-based treatments and fraudulent medical claims, and in the rise of false health and lifestyle experts. This study combines criminological and computer science expertise to explore and critically analyse the Twitter presence of providers of non-science-based anti-cancer treatments and their active supporters in the English-speaking online community to investigate their structural relationships and to analyse the characteristics of the most popular actors. The features of the social network observed indicate that there is not a stable community of promoters and supporters of non-science-based medical treatments in the Twittersphere, suggesting the lack of a defined subculture and the presence of transient collectives rather than identifiable groups. Nonetheless, it is possible to observe dynamic conversational networks clustering around popular actors, tweets and themes, prompting avenues for further research.
2158-2440
Lavorgna, Anita
6e34317e-2dda-42b9-8244-14747695598c
Carr, Leslie
0572b10e-039d-46c6-bf05-57cce71d3936
Lavorgna, Anita
6e34317e-2dda-42b9-8244-14747695598c
Carr, Leslie
0572b10e-039d-46c6-bf05-57cce71d3936

Lavorgna, Anita and Carr, Leslie (2021) Tweets and quacks: network and content analyses of providers of non-science-based anti-cancer treatments and their supporters on Twitter. SAGE Open. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Despite the consensus in the medical discipline that certain treatments lack scientific evidence and are worthless if not potentially dangerous, the promotion and selling of fake cures advertised as safe and effective has long plagued healthcare systems, praying on vulnerable patients and their loved ones. The Web and social media are now playing a fundamental role in the propagation of non-science-based treatments and fraudulent medical claims, and in the rise of false health and lifestyle experts. This study combines criminological and computer science expertise to explore and critically analyse the Twitter presence of providers of non-science-based anti-cancer treatments and their active supporters in the English-speaking online community to investigate their structural relationships and to analyse the characteristics of the most popular actors. The features of the social network observed indicate that there is not a stable community of promoters and supporters of non-science-based medical treatments in the Twittersphere, suggesting the lack of a defined subculture and the presence of transient collectives rather than identifiable groups. Nonetheless, it is possible to observe dynamic conversational networks clustering around popular actors, tweets and themes, prompting avenues for further research.

Text
Lavorgna&Carr - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 January 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447243
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447243
ISSN: 2158-2440
PURE UUID: 09a95ce6-0b4d-4812-951b-7ed2addecaf2
ORCID for Anita Lavorgna: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8484-1613
ORCID for Leslie Carr: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-9680

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Mar 2021 17:32
Last modified: 06 Mar 2021 02:45

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×