The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study

Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study
Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study
Background: evidence highlights the disproportionate impact of measures that have been introduced to reduce the spread of coronavirus on individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, and among those on a low income. An understanding of barriers to adherence in these populations is needed. In this qualitative study, we examined the patterns of adherence to mitigation measures and reasons underpinning these behaviors.

Methods: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants from BAME and low-income White backgrounds. The topic guide was designed to explore how individuals are adhering to social distancing and self-isolation during the pandemic and to explore the reasons underpinning this behavior.

Results: we identified three categories of adherence to lockdown measures: (i) caution-motivated super-adherence (ii) risk-adapted partial-adherence and (iii) necessity-driven partial-adherence. Decisions about adherence considered potential for exposure to the virus, ability to reduce risk through use of protective measures and perceived importance of/need for the behavior.

Conclusions: this research highlights a need for a more nuanced understanding of adherence to lockdown measures. Provision of practical and financial support could reduce the number of people who have to engage in necessity-driven partial-adherence. More evidence is required on population level risks of people adopting risk-adapted partial-adherence.

COVID-19, adherence, infection control, public involvement, qualitative, risk assessment
1741-3842
508-516
Denford, Sarah
8970b5a7-8cad-4356-ad0e-88297b67db37
Morton, Kate
6fa41cd3-ba4d-476c-9020-b8ef93c7ade7
Lambert, H.
5b6accc8-68e1-4435-80c9-7f0154bbca4f
Zhang, J
b2c96233-b69e-4a36-aaeb-6f18d186d350
Smith, L.E.
3fc6797c-89cd-41fd-b561-8187ddd94911
Cai, S
df2e228d-aa42-46f7-8936-50ccce505fab
Robin, C.
0b9c9852-957e-4921-9c6f-2567cde0b90d
Lasseter, G.
96deede8-a2f0-47cf-95cd-da48a7ca9844
Zhang, T
17c33ebe-f357-454a-96ec-466295603d08
Hickman, M.
278b63b4-126b-4db6-88a7-fcd9474d814c
Oliver, I.
22aa99db-1786-49da-a829-6392b40f1241
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Denford, Sarah
8970b5a7-8cad-4356-ad0e-88297b67db37
Morton, Kate
6fa41cd3-ba4d-476c-9020-b8ef93c7ade7
Lambert, H.
5b6accc8-68e1-4435-80c9-7f0154bbca4f
Zhang, J
b2c96233-b69e-4a36-aaeb-6f18d186d350
Smith, L.E.
3fc6797c-89cd-41fd-b561-8187ddd94911
Cai, S
df2e228d-aa42-46f7-8936-50ccce505fab
Robin, C.
0b9c9852-957e-4921-9c6f-2567cde0b90d
Lasseter, G.
96deede8-a2f0-47cf-95cd-da48a7ca9844
Zhang, T
17c33ebe-f357-454a-96ec-466295603d08
Hickman, M.
278b63b4-126b-4db6-88a7-fcd9474d814c
Oliver, I.
22aa99db-1786-49da-a829-6392b40f1241
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e

Denford, Sarah, Morton, Kate, Lambert, H., Zhang, J, Smith, L.E., Cai, S, Robin, C., Lasseter, G., Zhang, T, Hickman, M., Oliver, I. and Yardley, Lucy (2021) Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study. Journal of Public Health, 43 (3), 508-516. (doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdab005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: evidence highlights the disproportionate impact of measures that have been introduced to reduce the spread of coronavirus on individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, and among those on a low income. An understanding of barriers to adherence in these populations is needed. In this qualitative study, we examined the patterns of adherence to mitigation measures and reasons underpinning these behaviors.

Methods: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants from BAME and low-income White backgrounds. The topic guide was designed to explore how individuals are adhering to social distancing and self-isolation during the pandemic and to explore the reasons underpinning this behavior.

Results: we identified three categories of adherence to lockdown measures: (i) caution-motivated super-adherence (ii) risk-adapted partial-adherence and (iii) necessity-driven partial-adherence. Decisions about adherence considered potential for exposure to the virus, ability to reduce risk through use of protective measures and perceived importance of/need for the behavior.

Conclusions: this research highlights a need for a more nuanced understanding of adherence to lockdown measures. Provision of practical and financial support could reduce the number of people who have to engage in necessity-driven partial-adherence. More evidence is required on population level risks of people adopting risk-adapted partial-adherence.

Text
Adherence to self isolation_accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (820kB)
Text
Understanding patterns of adherence - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (669kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 February 2021
Published date: 9 February 2021
Keywords: COVID-19, adherence, infection control, public involvement, qualitative, risk assessment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447549
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447549
ISSN: 1741-3842
PURE UUID: 4edba992-6af5-4c78-8a98-62b4d4605327
ORCID for Kate Morton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-0314
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Mar 2021 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah Denford
Author: Kate Morton ORCID iD
Author: H. Lambert
Author: J Zhang
Author: L.E. Smith
Author: S Cai
Author: C. Robin
Author: G. Lasseter
Author: T Zhang
Author: M. Hickman
Author: I. Oliver
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×