The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Surgical workload from an integrated UK field hospital during the 2003 Gulf conflict

Surgical workload from an integrated UK field hospital during the 2003 Gulf conflict
Surgical workload from an integrated UK field hospital during the 2003 Gulf conflict

AIMS: This paper reports the surgical experience of a UK reserve field surgical hospital during military operations in Iraq during March and April 2003. Particular reference is given to the integration of the surgical specialities, consultant led and multidisciplinary teamworking in the treatment of military and civilian casualties from all sources and of all causes. METHODS All surgical workload data was collected prospectively for the warfighting (Phase One) and specialist referral (Phase Two) phases of the operation. Standard military and Red Cross protocols were used for all injuries and microbiology studies were undertaken for penetrating ballistic injuries. Operations were classified by anatomical region; upper or lower limb; head and neck; thoracic; abdominal, including genitourinary; ophthalmic; and burns, and by whether they were primary; secondary planned or secondary unplanned. RESULTS: A wide range of patterns of wounding arising from combat and non-combat related military and civilian trauma and burns were seen and treated. 323 operations were performed. There were 116 operations in phase one and 207 operations in phase two. There were 160 primary procedures (new patients), 146 secondary planned and 17 unplanned procedures (range one to eight procedures per patient). Close integration of general, orthopaedic, plastic, maxillofacial, ophthalmic and neurological surgeons and general and ITU anaesthetists allowed the delivery of a range of specialist treatment to a heterogenous patient population, including children as young as 6 months and a lady in the advanced stages of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of wounding in casualties surviving to reach specialist field hospital care were similar to those reported in other high intensity conflicts. A consultant led, multidisciplinary approach with field intensive care facilities allowed combined, staged and safe surgery for complex, multi-organ and multi-limb trauma in an austere environment.

0035-8665
99-106
Rew, D. A.
36dcc3ad-2379-4b61-a468-5c623d796887
Clasper, J.
325723ac-edfe-4e78-98fa-cb46022dd848
Kerr, G.
05d599ac-1f69-4e17-9a35-26c7fa0926fb
Rew, D. A.
36dcc3ad-2379-4b61-a468-5c623d796887
Clasper, J.
325723ac-edfe-4e78-98fa-cb46022dd848
Kerr, G.
05d599ac-1f69-4e17-9a35-26c7fa0926fb

Rew, D. A., Clasper, J. and Kerr, G. (2004) Surgical workload from an integrated UK field hospital during the 2003 Gulf conflict. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, 150 (2), 99-106. (doi:10.1136/jramc-150-02-06).

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIMS: This paper reports the surgical experience of a UK reserve field surgical hospital during military operations in Iraq during March and April 2003. Particular reference is given to the integration of the surgical specialities, consultant led and multidisciplinary teamworking in the treatment of military and civilian casualties from all sources and of all causes. METHODS All surgical workload data was collected prospectively for the warfighting (Phase One) and specialist referral (Phase Two) phases of the operation. Standard military and Red Cross protocols were used for all injuries and microbiology studies were undertaken for penetrating ballistic injuries. Operations were classified by anatomical region; upper or lower limb; head and neck; thoracic; abdominal, including genitourinary; ophthalmic; and burns, and by whether they were primary; secondary planned or secondary unplanned. RESULTS: A wide range of patterns of wounding arising from combat and non-combat related military and civilian trauma and burns were seen and treated. 323 operations were performed. There were 116 operations in phase one and 207 operations in phase two. There were 160 primary procedures (new patients), 146 secondary planned and 17 unplanned procedures (range one to eight procedures per patient). Close integration of general, orthopaedic, plastic, maxillofacial, ophthalmic and neurological surgeons and general and ITU anaesthetists allowed the delivery of a range of specialist treatment to a heterogenous patient population, including children as young as 6 months and a lady in the advanced stages of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of wounding in casualties surviving to reach specialist field hospital care were similar to those reported in other high intensity conflicts. A consultant led, multidisciplinary approach with field intensive care facilities allowed combined, staged and safe surgery for complex, multi-organ and multi-limb trauma in an austere environment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2004
Additional Information: Copyright: This record is sourced from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447635
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447635
ISSN: 0035-8665
PURE UUID: acd18a8d-fa86-4bcf-af67-7961e8435b39
ORCID for D. A. Rew: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4518-2667

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Mar 2021 17:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D. A. Rew ORCID iD
Author: J. Clasper
Author: G. Kerr

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×