The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Matching appropriate materials for disabled learners in a lifelong learning environment

Matching appropriate materials for disabled learners in a lifelong learning environment
Matching appropriate materials for disabled learners in a lifelong learning environment
Learning environments should provide accessible learning material. Research has focused on improving the discovery of learning materials suitable for the needs of people with disabilities. Most current practice focuses on disability type without considering the learner’s competence or their functional capability, that is, how well someone has the functional ability to perceive and perform tasks or activities. This research proposes the Matching Resource Functional capability and Competence model (MRFC) for accessible learning material and appropriate learning path, based on competences and functional capabilities. In the data model, intended learning outcomes (ILOs) contain provisions for recording capability and subject matter content. The MRFC model was reviewed and validated by 10 experts. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated through three experiments. These were designed to evaluate the reaction of learners to the MRFC against other methods, to evaluate the participants’ performance, and their experience. For Experiment I, a learning path was generated by algorithm based on a learner’s competence within a given domain. Functional capability was used to match material by using a presentation schema between the ILOs’ nodes in the learning path and the type of material which the learner was able to perceive. A presentation schema is a digest of the kinds of content, material types, and accessible features that people with different functional capabilities can perceive. Experiment II.1 showed that those who used a combination of functional capability and competence-based learning mode (CFCM) of the MRFC model had better results than those who only used a competence-based learning mode (CBM) or a free-browsing learning mode. Experiment II.2 showed that the CFCM was better than the CBM. Experiment II.3 showed that those who used the CFCM for learning had better learning outcomes and higher ratings of usefulness of learning material. The results for Experiment III showed that all variables for user experience and accessibility for the MRFC model were significantly higher than 3. These findings indicate that the participants agreed with all questions in this experiment.
University of Southampton
Mongkolsripattana, Sasithorn
1d259e4c-7cc5-4745-a5ca-2fad9a0ad73d
Mongkolsripattana, Sasithorn
1d259e4c-7cc5-4745-a5ca-2fad9a0ad73d
Wills, Gary
3a594558-6921-4e82-8098-38cd8d4e8aa0

Mongkolsripattana, Sasithorn (2020) Matching appropriate materials for disabled learners in a lifelong learning environment. Doctoral Thesis, 466pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Learning environments should provide accessible learning material. Research has focused on improving the discovery of learning materials suitable for the needs of people with disabilities. Most current practice focuses on disability type without considering the learner’s competence or their functional capability, that is, how well someone has the functional ability to perceive and perform tasks or activities. This research proposes the Matching Resource Functional capability and Competence model (MRFC) for accessible learning material and appropriate learning path, based on competences and functional capabilities. In the data model, intended learning outcomes (ILOs) contain provisions for recording capability and subject matter content. The MRFC model was reviewed and validated by 10 experts. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated through three experiments. These were designed to evaluate the reaction of learners to the MRFC against other methods, to evaluate the participants’ performance, and their experience. For Experiment I, a learning path was generated by algorithm based on a learner’s competence within a given domain. Functional capability was used to match material by using a presentation schema between the ILOs’ nodes in the learning path and the type of material which the learner was able to perceive. A presentation schema is a digest of the kinds of content, material types, and accessible features that people with different functional capabilities can perceive. Experiment II.1 showed that those who used a combination of functional capability and competence-based learning mode (CFCM) of the MRFC model had better results than those who only used a competence-based learning mode (CBM) or a free-browsing learning mode. Experiment II.2 showed that the CFCM was better than the CBM. Experiment II.3 showed that those who used the CFCM for learning had better learning outcomes and higher ratings of usefulness of learning material. The results for Experiment III showed that all variables for user experience and accessibility for the MRFC model were significantly higher than 3. These findings indicate that the participants agreed with all questions in this experiment.

Text
EThesis
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (19MB)
Text
PTDThesis_Mongkolsripattana-SIGNED
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: October 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447796
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447796
PURE UUID: 54969314-4243-4912-8f56-b2baa4d684f6
ORCID for Gary Wills: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5771-4088

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Mar 2021 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:43

Export record

Contributors

Author: Sasithorn Mongkolsripattana
Thesis advisor: Gary Wills ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×