Armed conflict and the environment: Perspectives from African Union Law
Armed conflict and the environment: Perspectives from African Union Law
During armed conflict the environment suffers both as a result of deliberate damage as a strategy of war, as well as through collateral harm. The intersection between the jus in bello (international humanitarian law) (‘IHL’) and international environmental law (‘IEL’), with the aim of addressing environmental harm as a result of armed conflict, is a relatively recent development. It was traditionally believed that the laws of war and peacetime laws were mutually exclusive. For decades the African continent has suffered the effects of armed conflict disproportionately, which implies that so too has the natural environment in Africa suffered these effects disproportionately. The aim of this article is to make a two-fold contribution. First, it provides a summation of the protection afforded to the environment during armed conflict by IHL and IEL in order to illuminate the shortcomings of the latter. Secondly, it undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the African regional legal framework of environmental protection in relation to armed conflict. This will determine how regional law in Africa may serve to complement the international legal regime in order to strengthen the protection of the environment during armed conflict on the continent. Furthermore, this analysis may also provide informative lessons for the current international law discourse on environmental protection during armed conflict. We conclude the article with brief remarks and recommendations.
1-26
Kentaro, C
d5257ee4-28f3-4126-8823-9d889f9ee4a6
Scholtz, W.
4e8ad72b-807a-4aee-bee3-203f038a0a8c
2014
Kentaro, C
d5257ee4-28f3-4126-8823-9d889f9ee4a6
Scholtz, W.
4e8ad72b-807a-4aee-bee3-203f038a0a8c
Kentaro, C and Scholtz, W.
(2014)
Armed conflict and the environment: Perspectives from African Union Law.
The South African Yearbook of International Law, 2014, .
Abstract
During armed conflict the environment suffers both as a result of deliberate damage as a strategy of war, as well as through collateral harm. The intersection between the jus in bello (international humanitarian law) (‘IHL’) and international environmental law (‘IEL’), with the aim of addressing environmental harm as a result of armed conflict, is a relatively recent development. It was traditionally believed that the laws of war and peacetime laws were mutually exclusive. For decades the African continent has suffered the effects of armed conflict disproportionately, which implies that so too has the natural environment in Africa suffered these effects disproportionately. The aim of this article is to make a two-fold contribution. First, it provides a summation of the protection afforded to the environment during armed conflict by IHL and IEL in order to illuminate the shortcomings of the latter. Secondly, it undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the African regional legal framework of environmental protection in relation to armed conflict. This will determine how regional law in Africa may serve to complement the international legal regime in order to strengthen the protection of the environment during armed conflict on the continent. Furthermore, this analysis may also provide informative lessons for the current international law discourse on environmental protection during armed conflict. We conclude the article with brief remarks and recommendations.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 447863
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447863
PURE UUID: 51a47152-2139-4899-a376-14666096f71f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Mar 2021 17:30
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 02:29
Export record
Contributors
Author:
C Kentaro
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics