The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic

A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic
A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic
Objective: to explore orthopaedic and musculoskeletal clinicians’ views and experiences of legal, safety, safeguarding and security issues regarding the use of virtual consultations (VC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective was to suggest ways to overcome these issues.

Methods: a mixed method cross-sectional survey was conducted, seeking the views and experiences of orthopaedic and musculoskeletal medically qualified and Allied Health Professionals in the United Kingdom. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed for quantitative data and a qualitative content analysis undertaken for qualitative data. Findings were presented in accordance with the four key issues.

Results: two hundred and ninety professionals (206 physiotherapists, 78 medically qualified professionals, 6 ‘other’ therapists) participated in the survey. Of the 290 participants, 260 (90%) were not using VC prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 248 respondents (86%) were unsure whether their professional indemnity insurance covered VC,136 (47%) had considered how they would handle an issue of safeguarding whilst the remainder had not,126 (43%) had considered what they would do if, during a virtual consultation, a patient suffered an injury (e.g. bang on their head) or a fall (e.g. mechanical or a medical event like syncope) and 158 (54%) reported they felt the current technological solutions are secure in terms of patient data. Qualitative data provided additional context to support the quantitative findings such as validity of indemnification; accuracy of diagnosis and consent using VC; safeguarding issues; and security and sharing of data. Potential changes to practice have been proposed to address these issues.

Conclusions: VC have been rapidly deployed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic often without clear guidance or consensus on many important issues. This study identified legal, safeguarding, safety and security issues. There is an urgent need to address these and develop local and national guidance and frameworks to facilitate ongoing safe virtual orthopaedic practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
1471-2474
Gilbert, Anthony William
a450c811-c6d3-4853-ae35-9f5287db8efa
Booth, G
19507755-73c0-44f5-9176-5dffb92de5d9
Betts, T.
6b630b39-8fbc-486f-86fb-384a69185f97
Goldberg, A
135345be-8661-4955-bfb9-27fa6788d41c
Gilbert, Anthony William
a450c811-c6d3-4853-ae35-9f5287db8efa
Booth, G
19507755-73c0-44f5-9176-5dffb92de5d9
Betts, T.
6b630b39-8fbc-486f-86fb-384a69185f97
Goldberg, A
135345be-8661-4955-bfb9-27fa6788d41c

Gilbert, Anthony William, Booth, G, Betts, T. and Goldberg, A (2021) A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22 (1), [245]. (doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04113-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to explore orthopaedic and musculoskeletal clinicians’ views and experiences of legal, safety, safeguarding and security issues regarding the use of virtual consultations (VC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective was to suggest ways to overcome these issues.

Methods: a mixed method cross-sectional survey was conducted, seeking the views and experiences of orthopaedic and musculoskeletal medically qualified and Allied Health Professionals in the United Kingdom. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed for quantitative data and a qualitative content analysis undertaken for qualitative data. Findings were presented in accordance with the four key issues.

Results: two hundred and ninety professionals (206 physiotherapists, 78 medically qualified professionals, 6 ‘other’ therapists) participated in the survey. Of the 290 participants, 260 (90%) were not using VC prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 248 respondents (86%) were unsure whether their professional indemnity insurance covered VC,136 (47%) had considered how they would handle an issue of safeguarding whilst the remainder had not,126 (43%) had considered what they would do if, during a virtual consultation, a patient suffered an injury (e.g. bang on their head) or a fall (e.g. mechanical or a medical event like syncope) and 158 (54%) reported they felt the current technological solutions are secure in terms of patient data. Qualitative data provided additional context to support the quantitative findings such as validity of indemnification; accuracy of diagnosis and consent using VC; safeguarding issues; and security and sharing of data. Potential changes to practice have been proposed to address these issues.

Conclusions: VC have been rapidly deployed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic often without clear guidance or consensus on many important issues. This study identified legal, safeguarding, safety and security issues. There is an urgent need to address these and develop local and national guidance and frameworks to facilitate ongoing safe virtual orthopaedic practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Text
A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (91kB)

More information

Published date: 5 March 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors are grateful to Iva Hauptmannova and colleagues at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Research and Innovation Centre and Therapies Department?for their support. It was not possible to involve patients or the public in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447870
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447870
ISSN: 1471-2474
PURE UUID: 3805275a-751f-4723-8405-4cf669986801

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Mar 2021 18:07
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 11:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anthony William Gilbert
Author: G Booth
Author: T. Betts
Author: A Goldberg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×