The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Investigating Neolithic Orkney: archaeological histories of inquiry regarding the orcadian neolithic

Investigating Neolithic Orkney: archaeological histories of inquiry regarding the orcadian neolithic
Investigating Neolithic Orkney: archaeological histories of inquiry regarding the orcadian neolithic
Situating archaeological research within the context of previous research is a characteristic of all modern science and serves several purposes, some simultaneously. It can be done to support conclusions put forth in earlier research, it can also be used to refute earlier research, but it can also be used as a method of demonstrating authority within a discipline and justifying new conclusions. Conventional approaches to situating research rely on disciplinary histories that they present a showcase view of the past that serves only to differentiate traditional, outdated archaeological practices and interpretations from current ones while simultaneously legitimizing them (Corbey & Roebroeks 2001: 1). Further, conventional disciplinary histories have emphasised the development of archaeological paradigms while simultaneously considering the social context less relevant (Moro-Abadia 2006, 4; Schnapp 2002, 134). The remains of the Orcadian Neolithic, have inspired archaeologists to investigate them over the past several hundred years. However, the social context and historical mechanisms that have contributed to Orkney being one of the most thoroughly examined and influential regions in British Neolithic Archaeology has rarely been explored. This dissertation examines the social and historical context in which knowledge was produced regarding the Orcadian Neolithic since World War II (WWII). It also examines the interplay between aspects of knowledge production and archaeological practice. In this examination, the dissertation argues that the current understanding of the Orcadian Neolithic has been influenced by the wider historical socio-political context and that examining histories of archaeological inquiry can identify aspects of knowledge production influenced by its context. Through this examination the dissertation provides insight into the discipline of archaeology and how it facilitates and regulates the inculcation of members, the production of discourse, and the dissemination of knowledge.
University of Southampton
Kerns, Christopher Joseph
fdc78984-7f00-45a3-9b69-0c32185be502
Kerns, Christopher Joseph
fdc78984-7f00-45a3-9b69-0c32185be502
Pollard, Carl
5080faff-bc2c-4d27-b702-e40a5eb40761
Sturt, Fraser
442e14e1-136f-4159-bd8e-b002bf6b95f6

Kerns, Christopher Joseph (2020) Investigating Neolithic Orkney: archaeological histories of inquiry regarding the orcadian neolithic. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 580pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Situating archaeological research within the context of previous research is a characteristic of all modern science and serves several purposes, some simultaneously. It can be done to support conclusions put forth in earlier research, it can also be used to refute earlier research, but it can also be used as a method of demonstrating authority within a discipline and justifying new conclusions. Conventional approaches to situating research rely on disciplinary histories that they present a showcase view of the past that serves only to differentiate traditional, outdated archaeological practices and interpretations from current ones while simultaneously legitimizing them (Corbey & Roebroeks 2001: 1). Further, conventional disciplinary histories have emphasised the development of archaeological paradigms while simultaneously considering the social context less relevant (Moro-Abadia 2006, 4; Schnapp 2002, 134). The remains of the Orcadian Neolithic, have inspired archaeologists to investigate them over the past several hundred years. However, the social context and historical mechanisms that have contributed to Orkney being one of the most thoroughly examined and influential regions in British Neolithic Archaeology has rarely been explored. This dissertation examines the social and historical context in which knowledge was produced regarding the Orcadian Neolithic since World War II (WWII). It also examines the interplay between aspects of knowledge production and archaeological practice. In this examination, the dissertation argues that the current understanding of the Orcadian Neolithic has been influenced by the wider historical socio-political context and that examining histories of archaeological inquiry can identify aspects of knowledge production influenced by its context. Through this examination the dissertation provides insight into the discipline of archaeology and how it facilitates and regulates the inculcation of members, the production of discourse, and the dissemination of knowledge.

Text
Investigating Neolithic Orkney: Archaeological Histories of Inquiry Regarding the Orcadian Neolithic - Author's Original
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (108MB)
Text
Permission to deposit thesis form CK and JP-signed
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (421kB)

More information

Published date: July 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447984
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447984
PURE UUID: 4973defc-f63f-492b-b6ed-23f705467779
ORCID for Carl Pollard: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8429-2009
ORCID for Fraser Sturt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-990X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Mar 2021 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Contributors

Author: Christopher Joseph Kerns
Thesis advisor: Carl Pollard ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Fraser Sturt ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×