The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution

When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution
When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution
Integrating the social rejection and brand dilution literatures, this study investigates consumer responses to luxury brand rejection. Across four studies, the findings elaborate that a threat to the luxury brand elicits negative affective responses among consumers with high self–brand connection, while consumers with low self–brand connection are not affected. The findings explain how consumer affective responses mediate behavioral responses to luxury brand rejection causing brand dilution and further elaborate the moderating role of self-construal and the rejection source (in-group vs. out-group) respectively. Specifically, luxury brand rejection by an in-group significantly causes brand dilution than rejection by an out-group for consumers with an interdependent self-construal, while consumers with an independent self-construal only decrease their behavioral intentions when rejection is initiated by an out-group. The findings offer substantive contributions to the social rejection, brand dilution, luxury branding and self-construal theory and provide important managerial insights.
Brand dilution, In-group/out-group, Luxury, Rejection, Self–brand connection, Self–construal
0148-2963
110-121
Khalifa, Dina
fd82efb8-4db8-454e-8424-8c2b778fa14a
Shukla, Paurav
d3acd968-350b-40cf-890b-12c2e7aaa49d
Khalifa, Dina
fd82efb8-4db8-454e-8424-8c2b778fa14a
Shukla, Paurav
d3acd968-350b-40cf-890b-12c2e7aaa49d

Khalifa, Dina and Shukla, Paurav (2021) When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution. Journal of Business Research, 129, 110-121. (doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.041).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Integrating the social rejection and brand dilution literatures, this study investigates consumer responses to luxury brand rejection. Across four studies, the findings elaborate that a threat to the luxury brand elicits negative affective responses among consumers with high self–brand connection, while consumers with low self–brand connection are not affected. The findings explain how consumer affective responses mediate behavioral responses to luxury brand rejection causing brand dilution and further elaborate the moderating role of self-construal and the rejection source (in-group vs. out-group) respectively. Specifically, luxury brand rejection by an in-group significantly causes brand dilution than rejection by an out-group for consumers with an interdependent self-construal, while consumers with an independent self-construal only decrease their behavioral intentions when rejection is initiated by an out-group. The findings offer substantive contributions to the social rejection, brand dilution, luxury branding and self-construal theory and provide important managerial insights.

Text
When Luxury Brand Rejection Causes Brand Dilution FINAL 15 Feb 2021 AA PURE - Accepted Manuscript
Download (370kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 February 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 March 2021
Published date: May 2021
Keywords: Brand dilution, In-group/out-group, Luxury, Rejection, Self–brand connection, Self–construal

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 447992
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/447992
ISSN: 0148-2963
PURE UUID: 6f25713e-5e0f-4b03-a11d-e8ce36793304
ORCID for Paurav Shukla: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-8622

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Mar 2021 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dina Khalifa
Author: Paurav Shukla ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×