The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An evaluation of coulomb stress changes from earthquake productivity variations in the western gulf of Corinth, Greece

An evaluation of coulomb stress changes from earthquake productivity variations in the western gulf of Corinth, Greece
An evaluation of coulomb stress changes from earthquake productivity variations in the western gulf of Corinth, Greece
Spatial and temporal evolution of the stress field in the seismically active and well-monitored area of the western Gulf of Corinth, Greece, is investigated. The highly accurate and vast regional catalogues were used for inverting seismicity rate changes into stress variation using a rate/state-dependent friction model. After explicitly determining the physical quantities incorporated in the model (characteristic relaxation time, fault constitutive parameters, and reference seismicity rates), we looked for stress changes across space and over time and their possible association with earthquake clustering and fault interactions. We focused our attention on the Efpalio doublet of January 2010 (M = 5.5 and M = 5.4), with a high aftershock productivity, and attempted to reproduce and interpret stress changes prior to and after the initiation of this seismicity burst. The spatial distribution of stress changes was evaluated after smoothing the seismological data by means of a probability density function (PDF). The inverted stress calculations were compared with the calculations derived from an independent approach (elastic dislocation model) and this comparison was quantified. The results of the two methods are in good agreement (up to 80 %) in the far field, with the inversion technique providing more robust results in the near field, where they are more sensitive to the uncertainties of coseismic slip distribution. It is worth mentioning that the stress inversion model proved to be a very sensitive stress meter, able to detect even small stress changes correlated with spatio–temporal earthquake clustering. Data analysis was attempted from 1975 onwards to simulate the stress changes associated with stronger earthquakes over a longer time span. This approach revealed that only M > 5.5 events induce considerable stress variations, although in some cases there was no evidence for such stress changes even after an M > 5.5 earthquake.
0033-4553
49-72
Leptokaropoulos, K.M.
6176f4d8-7af0-4575-bf2c-5aaba3d182ce
Papadimitriou, E.E.
ae27b6e4-643e-46d8-a17a-5d7af35d3d0f
Orlecka–Sikora, B.
a7971263-a47e-4fcf-8486-402a923ca205
Karakostas, V.G.
b884cc21-5ba5-45ea-8956-75c811f2f375
Leptokaropoulos, K.M.
6176f4d8-7af0-4575-bf2c-5aaba3d182ce
Papadimitriou, E.E.
ae27b6e4-643e-46d8-a17a-5d7af35d3d0f
Orlecka–Sikora, B.
a7971263-a47e-4fcf-8486-402a923ca205
Karakostas, V.G.
b884cc21-5ba5-45ea-8956-75c811f2f375

Leptokaropoulos, K.M., Papadimitriou, E.E., Orlecka–Sikora, B. and Karakostas, V.G. (2015) An evaluation of coulomb stress changes from earthquake productivity variations in the western gulf of Corinth, Greece. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 49-72. (doi:10.1007/s00024-015-1057-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Spatial and temporal evolution of the stress field in the seismically active and well-monitored area of the western Gulf of Corinth, Greece, is investigated. The highly accurate and vast regional catalogues were used for inverting seismicity rate changes into stress variation using a rate/state-dependent friction model. After explicitly determining the physical quantities incorporated in the model (characteristic relaxation time, fault constitutive parameters, and reference seismicity rates), we looked for stress changes across space and over time and their possible association with earthquake clustering and fault interactions. We focused our attention on the Efpalio doublet of January 2010 (M = 5.5 and M = 5.4), with a high aftershock productivity, and attempted to reproduce and interpret stress changes prior to and after the initiation of this seismicity burst. The spatial distribution of stress changes was evaluated after smoothing the seismological data by means of a probability density function (PDF). The inverted stress calculations were compared with the calculations derived from an independent approach (elastic dislocation model) and this comparison was quantified. The results of the two methods are in good agreement (up to 80 %) in the far field, with the inversion technique providing more robust results in the near field, where they are more sensitive to the uncertainties of coseismic slip distribution. It is worth mentioning that the stress inversion model proved to be a very sensitive stress meter, able to detect even small stress changes correlated with spatio–temporal earthquake clustering. Data analysis was attempted from 1975 onwards to simulate the stress changes associated with stronger earthquakes over a longer time span. This approach revealed that only M > 5.5 events induce considerable stress variations, although in some cases there was no evidence for such stress changes even after an M > 5.5 earthquake.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 28 February 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 448098
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448098
ISSN: 0033-4553
PURE UUID: eeeaa93a-9742-47df-9dfd-e55057f5cc25
ORCID for K.M. Leptokaropoulos: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Apr 2021 15:58
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E.E. Papadimitriou
Author: B. Orlecka–Sikora
Author: V.G. Karakostas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×