The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

When vying reveals lying: the timed antagonistic response althiometer

When vying reveals lying: the timed antagonistic response althiometer
When vying reveals lying: the timed antagonistic response althiometer
Two experiments tested a new computer-based lie-detection technique. The Timed Antagonistic Response Alethiometer (TARA) manufacturers a situation in which, if respondents lie, they must perform two incompatible tasks, whereas if they tell the truth, they can perform two compatible ones. Both tasks involve repeatedly classifying target and control statements as true or false. The incompatible task combination, being more difficult, takes longer to complete correctly; hence, slower responses diagnose dishonesty. Experiment 1 found that, while concurrently classifying control statements honestly, participants invariably took longer to classify target statements dishonestly than honestly. Exploiting this effect, Experiment 2 found that separate groups of liars and truth-tellers could be distinguished with about 85% accuracy. The properties and potential of the technique are discussed.
0888-4080
631-647
Gregg, Aiden P.
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063
Gregg, Aiden P.
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063

Gregg, Aiden P. (2007) When vying reveals lying: the timed antagonistic response althiometer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21 (5), 631-647. (doi:10.1002/acp.1298).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Two experiments tested a new computer-based lie-detection technique. The Timed Antagonistic Response Alethiometer (TARA) manufacturers a situation in which, if respondents lie, they must perform two incompatible tasks, whereas if they tell the truth, they can perform two compatible ones. Both tasks involve repeatedly classifying target and control statements as true or false. The incompatible task combination, being more difficult, takes longer to complete correctly; hence, slower responses diagnose dishonesty. Experiment 1 found that, while concurrently classifying control statements honestly, participants invariably took longer to classify target statements dishonestly than honestly. Exploiting this effect, Experiment 2 found that separate groups of liars and truth-tellers could be distinguished with about 85% accuracy. The properties and potential of the technique are discussed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 44814
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/44814
ISSN: 0888-4080
PURE UUID: bd5f1626-4350-4976-bfa8-70cbe12ac48f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×