The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rediscovering the relative deprivation and crime debate: tracking its fortunes from left realism to the precariat

Rediscovering the relative deprivation and crime debate: tracking its fortunes from left realism to the precariat
Rediscovering the relative deprivation and crime debate: tracking its fortunes from left realism to the precariat

This article revisits the concept of relative deprivation and asks whether it is still useful for criminology. The article traces the way relative deprivation has been used in the past to understand crime and how it has connections to other, more recent, additions to debates on social justice. I argue that relative deprivation has disappeared even in the place that it had become the key explanation for crime—left realism. In so doing, I explore the resurrection of left realism in criminology—what I refer to as “post-millennial left realism”—first, by those who were associated with it originally, and then with Hall and Winlow’s (2015, 2017) shift in emphasis to what they term “ultra-realism.” I maintain that relative deprivation is still a powerful concept for bridging several related areas that should still be central to the concerns of criminology—in part, because it is still a major concern in popular social science and social psychology. Why has it disappeared in criminology? I present an argument that suggests that the absence of certain research methods, such as ethnographic and qualitative or small-scale survey methods, has impoverished our understanding of the lived reality of people experiencing the social transformations of a networked, precarious society. The massive polarization and disruption in politics and social discourse, as well as the worldwide economic, public health, and social transformations (ranging from the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter protests to the COVID-19 global pandemic) have demonstrated the continued relevance and analytical power that relative deprivation, in its elaborated form, brings to questions of crime and justice.

1205-8629
1-27
Webber, Craig
35851bbe-83e6-4c9b-9dd2-cdf1f60c245d
Webber, Craig
35851bbe-83e6-4c9b-9dd2-cdf1f60c245d

Webber, Craig (2021) Rediscovering the relative deprivation and crime debate: tracking its fortunes from left realism to the precariat. Critical Criminology, 1-27. (doi:10.1007/s10612-021-09554-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article revisits the concept of relative deprivation and asks whether it is still useful for criminology. The article traces the way relative deprivation has been used in the past to understand crime and how it has connections to other, more recent, additions to debates on social justice. I argue that relative deprivation has disappeared even in the place that it had become the key explanation for crime—left realism. In so doing, I explore the resurrection of left realism in criminology—what I refer to as “post-millennial left realism”—first, by those who were associated with it originally, and then with Hall and Winlow’s (2015, 2017) shift in emphasis to what they term “ultra-realism.” I maintain that relative deprivation is still a powerful concept for bridging several related areas that should still be central to the concerns of criminology—in part, because it is still a major concern in popular social science and social psychology. Why has it disappeared in criminology? I present an argument that suggests that the absence of certain research methods, such as ethnographic and qualitative or small-scale survey methods, has impoverished our understanding of the lived reality of people experiencing the social transformations of a networked, precarious society. The massive polarization and disruption in politics and social discourse, as well as the worldwide economic, public health, and social transformations (ranging from the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter protests to the COVID-19 global pandemic) have demonstrated the continued relevance and analytical power that relative deprivation, in its elaborated form, brings to questions of crime and justice.

Text
Webber2021_Article_RediscoveringTheRelativeDepriv - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (648kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 March 2021
Published date: 9 March 2021
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 448243
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448243
ISSN: 1205-8629
PURE UUID: 849a3c0e-9781-4ced-b283-f26945839acd
ORCID for Craig Webber: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-7579

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2021 16:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×