Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Perceptions of memory detail and perceptions of accessibility
Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Perceptions of memory detail and perceptions of accessibility
Four samples of participants recalled autobiographical memories. While some evidence emerged from regression analyses suggesting that judgements of the amount of detail contained in each memory and judgements of the ease with which events could be recalled were partially independent, the analyses generally showed that these judgements were similarly predicted by various event characteristics (age, typicality, self-importance, emotional intensity at event occurrence, rehearsal types). Co-occurrence frequency data yielded similar conclusions, showing that while ease ratings and detail ratings occasionally diverged, they were more often consistent with each other. Finally, the data also suggested that events that prompted emotional ambivalence were not judged to be more easily recalled, or to contain more detail, than non-ambivalent events.
471-485
Ritchie, Timothy D.
5e91c0e9-36e5-4912-8b50-3b5a9f1e709a
Skowronski, John J.
47eb23aa-177b-4634-b986-5b935998bf6b
Walker, W. Richard
c95398d5-3c43-4126-9ff6-34862f76d5ce
Wood, Sarah E.
de296b0a-f5c4-4a26-a389-0ce7bc78da10
2006
Ritchie, Timothy D.
5e91c0e9-36e5-4912-8b50-3b5a9f1e709a
Skowronski, John J.
47eb23aa-177b-4634-b986-5b935998bf6b
Walker, W. Richard
c95398d5-3c43-4126-9ff6-34862f76d5ce
Wood, Sarah E.
de296b0a-f5c4-4a26-a389-0ce7bc78da10
Ritchie, Timothy D., Skowronski, John J., Walker, W. Richard and Wood, Sarah E.
(2006)
Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Perceptions of memory detail and perceptions of accessibility.
Memory, 14 (4), .
(doi:10.1080/09658210500478434).
Abstract
Four samples of participants recalled autobiographical memories. While some evidence emerged from regression analyses suggesting that judgements of the amount of detail contained in each memory and judgements of the ease with which events could be recalled were partially independent, the analyses generally showed that these judgements were similarly predicted by various event characteristics (age, typicality, self-importance, emotional intensity at event occurrence, rehearsal types). Co-occurrence frequency data yielded similar conclusions, showing that while ease ratings and detail ratings occasionally diverged, they were more often consistent with each other. Finally, the data also suggested that events that prompted emotional ambivalence were not judged to be more easily recalled, or to contain more detail, than non-ambivalent events.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 44829
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/44829
ISSN: 0965-8211
PURE UUID: 5a624434-35de-4434-b7ad-be3f98b4e434
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Mar 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Timothy D. Ritchie
Author:
John J. Skowronski
Author:
W. Richard Walker
Author:
Sarah E. Wood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics